Designing a research experience for teachers: applying features of effective professional development to a hybrid setting

References

• Billingsley, B., and M. Nassaji. 2019. “Exploring Secondary School Students’ Stances on the Predictive and Explanatory Power of Science.” Science & Education 28 (1–2): 87–107. doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00031-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., and V. D. Sampson. 2017. “Fostering Impactful Research Experiences for Teachers (RETS).” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (1): 447–465. doi:10.12973/ejmste/80352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., and G. J. Kelly. 2017. “Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education.” Science Education 101 (3): 486–505. doi:10.1002/sce.21271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. “Effective Teacher Professional Development.” Learning Policy Institute. https://www.teacherscholars.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. G., L. Z. Jaber, and S. A. Southerland. 2021. “Cultivating Science Teachers’ Understandings of Science as a Discipline.” Science Education 1–27. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00276-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2011. “A Primer on Effective Professional Development.” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (6): 68–71. doi:10.1177/003172171109200616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, M., and E. Worley. 2006. “Teacher Research Experiences, Partnerships with Scientists, and Teacher Networks Sustaining Factors from Professional Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-9000-5.
   Google Scholar
• Enderle, P., M. Dentzau, K. Roseler, S. Southerland, E. Granger, R. Hughes, B. Golden, and Y. Saka. 2014. “Examining the Influence of RETs on Science Teacher Beliefs and Practice.” Science Education 98 (6): 1077–1108. doi:10.1002/sce.21127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, C., E. Hardin, S. Klein-Gardner, and L. Benson. 2014. “Development of Teachers as Scientists in Research Experiences for Teachers Programs.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (7): 785–806. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9400-5.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, C. M., P. J. Dixon, and M. M. Pop. 2009. “Research Experiences for Teachers: Influences Related to Expectancy and Value of Changes to Practice in the American Classroom.” Professional Development in Education 35 (2): 247–260. doi:10.1080/13674580802532712.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., and K. S. Yoon. 2009. “What Works in Professional Development?” Phi Delta Kappan 90 (7): 495–500. doi:10.1177/003172170909000709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., C. Ling, R. L. Shehab, J. Herron, M. A. Nanny, M. U. Nollert, H. Refai, C. Ramseyer, and E. D. Wollega. 2014. “Designing and Evaluating a STEM Teacher Learning Opportunity in the Research University.” Evaluation and Program Planning 43: 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., C. Ling, R. L. Shehab, M. A. Nanny, M. U. Nollert, H. Refai, C. Ramseyer, J. Herron, E. D. Wollega, and S.-M. Huang. 2017. “Situating Teachers’ Developmental Engineering Experiences in an Inquiry-based, Laboratory Learning Environment.” Teacher Development 21 (2): 243–268. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1224776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, D. G., S. F. Bancroft, M. M. Edwards, and C. J. Schairer. 2016. “I Want to Be the Inquiry Guy! How Research Experiences for Teachers Change Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values about Teaching Science as Inquiry.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (2): 183–204. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9450-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunzicker, J. 2011. “Effective Professional Development for Teachers: A Checklist.” Professional Development in Education 37 (2): 177–179. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.523955.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. 2008. “Productive Failure.” Cognition and Instruction 26 (3): 379–424. doi:10.1080/07370000802212669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein-Gardner, S. S., M. E. Johnston, and L. Benson. 2012. “Impact of RET Teacher-Developed Curriculum Units on Classroom Experiences for Teachers and Students.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 2 (2): 21–35. doi:10.5703/1288284314868.
   Google Scholar
• Krim, J. S., L. E. Coté, R. S. Schwartz, E. M. Stone, J. J. Cleeves, K. J. Barry, W. Burgess, et al. 2019. “Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of the Literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs.” CBE Life Sciences Education 18 (4): 1–14. DOI:10.1187/cbe.19-03-0069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsely, S., K. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2013. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Menekse, M., G. S. Stump, S. Krause, and M. T. H. Chi. 2013. “Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (3): 346–374. doi:10.1002/jee.20021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E., E. Manz, R. Russ, D. Stroupe, and L. Berland. 2018. “Addressing the Epistemic Elephant in the Room: Epistemic Agency and the Next Generation Science Standards.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (7): 1053–1075. doi:10.1002/tea.21459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, R. J., and J. B. Damico. 2013. “Science Teachers’ Beliefs about the Influence of Their Summer Research Experiences on Their Pedagogical Practices.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (8): 1241–1261. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9331-y.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., S. S. Guzey, and A. Brown. 2014. “Greenhouse Design: An Engineering Unit.” Science Scope 37 (7): 51–57. doi:10.2505/4/ss14_037_07_51.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2017. “Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering and Computer Science Supplements and Sites.” July 11. https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf17575
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. “Transformative Competencies for 2030.” OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual Learning Framework. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/transformative-competencies/Transformative_Competencies_for_2030_concept_note.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T., M. E. West, R. L. Kajfez, K. L. Malone, and K. E. Irving. 2019. “The Effect of Teacher Professional Development on Implementing Engineering in Elementary Schools.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 9 (2): 64–71. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1246.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, J. E., C. L. Farmer, and S. S. Klein-Gardner. 2015. “An Introduction to the Standards for Preparation and Professional Development for Teachers of Engineering.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 5 (1): 40–60. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1107.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. 2013. “What Professional Development Strategies Are Needed for Successful Implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards?” Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment, Washington D. C. 1–23. http://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/publications/paper/2013/jvhf
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J., M. Novak, and T. A. McGill. 2017. “Coherence from the Students’ Perspective: Why the Vision of the Framework for K-12 Science Requires More than Simply ‘Combining’ Three Dimensions of Science Learning.” Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards. Board on Science Education Workshop. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_180270.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. Burgin, L. McKinney, and L. Ponjuan. 2010. “Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (3): 235–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, S. C., J. Dubner, J. Miller, S. Glied, and J. D. Loike. 2009. “Teachers’ Participation in Research Programs Improves Their Students’ Achievement in Science.” Science 326 (5951): 440–442. doi:10.1126/science.1177344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., E. M. Granger, R. Hughes, P. Enderle, F. Ke, K. Roseler, Y. Saka, and M. Tekkumru-Kisa. 2016. “Essential Aspects of Science Teacher Professional Development: Making Research Participation Instructionally Effective.” AERA Open 2 (4): 1–16. doi:10.1177/2332858416674200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., and J. Strobel. 2014. “From Knowing-about to Knowing-to: Development of Engineering Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Elementary Teachers through Perceived Learning and Implementing Difficulties.” American Journal of Engineering Education 5 (1): 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Valiandes, S., and L. Neophytou. 2018. “Teachers’ Professional Development for Differentiated Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms: Investigating the Impact of a Development Program on Teachers’ Professional Learning and on Students’ Achievement.” Teacher Development 22 (1): 123–138. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. 2013. “Professional Development for Science Teachers.” Science 340 (6130): 310–313. doi:10.1126/science.1230725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S., M. M. Balgopal, L. B. Sample McMeeking, and A. E. Weinberg. 2019. “Developing Resilient K-12 STEM Teachers.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 21 (1): 16–34. doi:10.1177/1523422318814483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar