Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 27, 2023 - Issue 2
207
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Italian teachers’ conceptions of large-scale assessment: what are the implications for assessment literacy?

ORCID Icon
Pages 153-171 | Received 11 Dec 2020, Accepted 19 May 2022, Published online: 08 Mar 2023

References

  • Adie, L., G. Stobart, and J. Cumming. 2020. “The Construction of the Teacher as Expert Assessor.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 48 (4): 436–453. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2019.1633623.
  • Ämmälä, A., and O. Kyrö-Ämmälä. 2018. “Conceptions of School Assessment: What Do Finnish Elementary School Students Think of Assessment?” Education in the North 25 (1–2): 275–294. doi:10.26203/0g1s-hf54.
  • Andrade, H. L., and M. Heritage. 2018. Using Formative Assessment to Enhance Learning, Achievement, and Academic Self-regulation. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Azis, A. 2015. “Conceptions and Practices of Assessment: A Case of Teachers Representing Improvement Conception.” TEFLIN Journal 26 (2): 129–154. doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/129-154.
  • Baird, J. A., T. N. Hopfenbeck, P. Newton, G. Stobart, and A. T. Steen-Utheim. 2014. State of the Field Review Assessment and Learning (Case Number 13/4697). Oslo: Knowledge Centre for Education.
  • Barnes, N., H. Fives, and C. M. Dacey. 2017. “US Teachers’ Conceptions of the Purpose of Assessment.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65: 107–116. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.017.
  • Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. London: Sage.
  • Betoret, F. D., and A. G. Artiga. 2004. “Trainee Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching and Learning, Classroom Layout and Exam Design.” Educational Studies 30 (4): 355–372. doi:10.1080/0305569042000310309.
  • Birenbaum, M., C. DeLuca, L. Earl, M. Heritage, V. Klenowski, A. Looney, K. Smith, H. Timperley, L. Volante, and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2015. “International Trends in the Implementation of Assessment: Implications for Policy and Practice.” Policy Futures in Education 13 (1): 117–140. doi:10.1177/1478210314566733.
  • Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the Black Box. London: Kings College.
  • Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2007. “Large-scale Assessment Systems: Design Principles Drawn from International Comparisons.” Measurement 5 (1): 1–53. doi:10.1080/15366360701293386.
  • Boardman, A. G., and A. L. Woodruff. 2004. “Teacher Change and “High Stakes” Assessment: What Happen to Professional Development?” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (6): 545–557. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.001.
  • Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
  • Brown, G. T. L. 2004. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Implications for Policy and Professional Development.” Assessment in Education 11 (3): 301–318. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304609.
  • Brown, G. T. L., and A. Remesal. 2017. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Comparing Two Inventories with Ecuadorian Teachers.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 55: 68–74. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.003.
  • Cheung, D., and H. W. Wong. 2002. “Measuring Teacher Beliefs about Alternative Curriculum Design.” The Curriculum Journal 13 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1080/09585170210136868.
  • Cizek, G. J. 2001. “More Unintended Consequences of High-stakes Testing.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 20 (4): 19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00072.x.
  • Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2007. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dahlin, B., D. A. Watkins, and M. Ekholm. 2001. “The Role of Assessment in Student Learning: The View of Hong Kong and Swedish Lecturers.” In Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspective, edited by D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs, 47–74. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. 2017. “Teacher Education around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice?” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 291–309. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.
  • DeLuca, C., and A. Bellara. 2013. “The Current State of Assessment Education Aligning Policy, Standards, and Teacher Education Curriculum.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (4): 356–372. doi:10.1177/0022487113488144.
  • DeLuca, C., and L. Volante. 2016. “Assessment for Learning in Teacher Education Programs: Navigating the Juxtaposition of Theory and Praxis.” Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education 20 (1): 19–31.
  • Deneen, C. C., and G. T. L. Brown. 2016. “The Impact of Conceptions of Assessment on Assessment Literacy in a Teacher Education Programme.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1225380.
  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Desimone, L. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
  • De Simone, J. J. 2020. “The Roles of Collaborative Professional Development, Self-efficacy, and Positive Affect in Encouraging Educator Data Use to Aid Student Learning.” Teacher Development 24 (4): 443–465. doi:10.1080/13664530.2020.1780302.
  • Elwood, J., and V. Klenowski. 2002. “Creating Communities of Shared Practice: Assessment Use in Learning and Teaching.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (3): 243–256. doi:10.1080/02602930220138606.
  • Emler, T. E., Y. Zhao, J. Deng, D. Yin, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Side Effects of Large-Scale Assessments in Education.” Review of Education 2 (3): 279–296. doi:10.1177/2096531119878964.
  • Farley-Rippl, E., and J. Buttram. 2015. “The Development of Capacity for Data Use: The Role of Teacher Networks in an Elementary School.” Teachers College Record 11 (4): 1–34. doi:10.1177/016146811511700410.
  • Farrell, C. C., and J. A. Marsh. 2016. “Contributing Conditions: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Teachers’ Instructional Responses to Data.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60 (1): 398–412. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.010.
  • Fives, H., and M. M. Buehl. 2012. “Spring Cleaning for the ‘Messy’ Construct of Teachers’ Beliefs: What Are They? Which Have Been Examined? What Can They Tell Us?” In APA Educational Psychology Handbook, edited by K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, and M. Zeidner, Vol. 2. Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, 471–499. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13274-019.
  • Fullan, M., J. Quinn, and J. McEachen. 2018. Deep Learning: Engage the World to Change the World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Furlong, J. 2015. Teaching Tomorrow’s Teachers. Options for the Future of Initial Teacher Education in Wales (report to Huw Lewis, Minister for Education and Skills). Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Guskey, T. R., P. Roy, and V. von Frank. 2014. Reach the Highest Standard in Professional Learning: Data. New York: Sage Publications.
  • Hargreaves, A. 2020. “Large-scale Assessments and Their Effects: The Case of Mid-stakes Tests in Ontario.” Journal of Educational Change 21: 393–420. doi:10.1007/s10833-020-09380-5.
  • Herman, J. 2016. Comprehensive Standards Based-assessment Systems Supporting Learning. Los Angeles: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
  • Herppich, S., A.-K. Praetorius, N. Forster, I. Glogger-Frey, K. Karst, D. Leutner, L. Behrmann, M. Böhmer, S. Ufer, J. Klug, et al. 2018. “Teachers’ Assessment Competence: Integrating Knowledge-, Process-, and Product-oriented Approaches into a Competence-oriented Conceptual Model”. Teaching and Teacher Education 76: 181–193. 10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.001.
  • Hopfenbeck, T. N. 2015. “Formative Assessment, Grading and Teacher Judgement in Times of Change.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22 (2): 299–301.
  • Hopster-den Ottera, D., S. Woolsb, T. J. H. M. Eggena, and B. P. Veldkamp. 2017. “Formative Use of Test Results: A User’s Perspective.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 52: 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.002.
  • Klieger, A. 2016. “Principals and Teachers: Different Perceptions of Large-scale Assessment.” International Journal of Educational Research 75: 143–145. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.006.
  • Klinger, D. A., and W. T. Rogers. 2011. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Large- Scale Assessment Programs within Low-stakes Accountability Frameworks.” International Journal of Testing 11 (2): 122–143. doi:10.1080/15305058.2011.552748.
  • Leighton, J. P., R. J. Gokiert, M. K. Cor, and C. Heffernan. 2010. “Teacher Beliefs about the Cognitive Diagnostic Information of Classroom‐ versus Large‐scale Tests: Implications for Assessment Literacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (1): 7–21. doi:10.1080/09695940903565362.
  • Lewis, S., and B. Lingard. 2015. “The Multiple Effects of International Large-scale Assessment on Education Policy and Research.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 621–637. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1039765.
  • Livingston, K., and C. Hutchinson. 2017. “Developing Teachers’ Capacities in Assessment through Career-long Professional Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 24 (2): 290–307. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1223016.
  • Looney, A., J. Cumming, F. van Der Kleij, and K. Haris. 2018. “Reconceptualizing the Role of Teachers as Assessors: Teacher Assessment Identity.” Assessment in Education: Principle, Policy & Practice 25 (5): 442–467.
  • Lutovac, S., and M. A. Flores. 2022. “Conceptions of Assessment in Pre-service Teachers’ Narratives of Students’ Failure.” Cambridge Journal of Education 52 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2021.1935736.
  • Mandinach, E. B., and E. S. Gummer. 2016. Data Literacy for Teachers: Making It Count in Teacher Preparation and Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Marsh, J. A., M. Bertrand, and A. Huguet. 2015. “Using Data to Alter Instructional Practice: The Mediating Role of Coaches and Professional Learning Communities.” Teachers College Record 117 (4): 1–41. doi:10.1177/016146811511700411.
  • Martini, A., and M. Papini. 2015. Che Cosa ne Pensano Gli Insegnanti delle Prove INVALSI. Working Paper, 24-2015. Roma: INVALSI.
  • McMillan, J. H. 2017. Classroom Assessment. Principles and Practice that Enhance Student Learning and Motivation. 7th ed. New York: Pearson.
  • Monteiro, V., L. Mata, and N. N. Santos. 2021. “Assessment Conceptions and Practices: Perspectives of Primary School Teachers and Students.” Frontiers in Education 6. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.631185.
  • OECD [The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. 2018. Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Pastore, S. 2020. Saper (Ben) Valutare. Firenze: Mondadori.
  • Pastore, S., and H. Andrade. 2019. “Teacher Assessment Literacy: A Three-dimensional Model.” Teaching and Teacher Education 84: 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Popham, W. J. 2018. Assessment Literacy for Educators in a Hurry. Alexandria: ASCD.
  • Pratt, D. D. 1992. “Conceptions of Teaching.” Adult Education Quarterly 42 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1177/074171369204200401.
  • Remesal, A. 2007. “Educational Reform and Primary and Secondary Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: The Spanish Instance. Building upon Black and Wiliam (2015).” The Curriculum Journal 18 (1): 27–38. doi:10.1080/09585170701292133.
  • Remesal, A. 2011. “Primary and Secondary Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Qualitative Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 472–482. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017.
  • Robertson, S. L. 2015. “What Teachers Need to Know about the ‘Global Education Reform Movement.” In Global Education ‘Reform’. Building Resistance and Solidarity, edited by G. Little, 10–17. Croydon: Manifesto Press.
  • Sahlberg, P. 2016. “The Global Educational Reform Movement and Its Impact on Shooling.” In The Handbook of Global Education Policy, edited by K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, and A. Verger, 128–144. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Schildkamp, K. 2019. “Data-based Decision-making for School Improvement: Research Insights and Gaps.” Educational Research 61: 257–273. doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716.
  • Schildkamp, K., L. Karbautzki, and J. Vanhoof. 2014. “Exploring Data Use Practices around Europe: Identifying Enablers and Barriers.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007.
  • Simon, M., R. Tierney, and R. Forgette-Giroux. 2008. Grading in A Standards-based Educational System: A Secondary School Teacher Account. Available from: http://www.mea.uottawa.ca/documents/CSSE08paperMsMay10-08.pdf.
  • Smith, W. C., ed. 2016. The Global Testing Culture. Shaping Education Policy, Perceptions, and Practice. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
  • Stebbins, R. A. 2001. Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steiner-Khamsi, G., and F. Waldow. 2018. “PISA for Scandalisation, PISA for Projection: The Use of International Large-scale Assessments in Education Policy Making - An Introduction.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 16 (5): 557–565. doi:10.1080/14767724.2018.1531234.
  • Stiggins, R. 2017. The Perfect Assessment System. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Torrance, D., and C. Forde. 2017. “Redefining What It Means to Be a Teacher through Professional Standards: Implications for Continuing Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (1): 10–126. doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527.
  • Verger, A., L. Parcerisa, and C. Fontdevila. 2019. “The Growth and Spread of Large-scale Assessments and Test-based Accountabilities: A Political Sociology of Global Education Reforms.” Educational Review 71 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045.
  • Volante, L., and L. Earl. 2013. “Standards, Accountability, and Student Assessment Systems: An International Overview”. Education Canada. 53. Available from: http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/standards-accountability-and-student-assessment-systems.
  • Wiliam, D. 2013. “How Is Testing Supposed to Improve Schooling? Some Reflections.” Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 11 (1–2): 55–59.
  • Will, K. K., S. R. McConnell, M. Elmquist, E. M. Lease, and A. Wackerle-Hollman. 2019. “Meeting in the Middle: Future Directions for Researchers to Support Educators’ Assessment Literacy and Data-based Decision Making.” Frontiers in Education 4. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00106.
  • Xu, Y., and G. T. L. Brown. 2016. “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58 (1): 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010.
  • Yue-Yi, H. 2021. “What Works Depends: Teacher Accountability Policy and Sociocultural Context in International Large-scale Surveys.” Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2021.2009919.
  • Zhao, Y. 2016. Counting What Counts: Reframing Education Outcomes. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.