How university professors foster argumentation in their teaching processes and how their students respond. A case study

References

• Berland, L. K., and K. L. McNeill. 2012. “For Whom is Argument and Explanation a Necessary Distinction? A Response to Osborne and Patterson.” Science Education 96 (5): 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., M. Benus, and J. Hernandez. 2019. “Managing Uncertainty in Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 103 (5): 1235–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., B. Hand, and L. Norton-Meier. 2017. “Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation.” Research in Science Education 47 (2): 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., and J. Osborne. 2014. “The Science Classroom as a Site of Epistemic Talk: A Case Study of a Teacher’s Attempts to Teach Science Based on Argument.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (10): 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287:AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. 2008. “Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals.” Review of Research in Education 32 (1): 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I., A. Ciftci, and M. Sami Topcu. 2017. “Examination of the Questions Used in Science Lessons and Argumentation Levels of Students.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 16 (6): 980. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. 2007. “Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, edited by Sibel Erduran and María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, 47–69. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_3.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., L. Guilfoyle, and W. Park. 2020. “Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching.” Research In Science Education 52 (2): 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and , and M. Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2012. “Argumentation in Science Education Research: Perspectives from Europe.“ in Science Education Research and Practice in Europe edited by D. Jorde, J. Dillon, 253–289. Rotterdam: Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_11.
   Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., and K. McNeill. 2019. “Teachers’ Framing of Argumentation Goals: Working Together to Develop Individual versus Communal Understanding.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (6): 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. B., N. Zillmer, A. Holton, S. Weiner, E. Greenwald, M. L. L. Megan Goss, P. D. P. Christina Morales, and K. L. McNeill. 2021. “How Science Teachers Dialog Classrooms: Towards a Practical and Responsive Formative Assessment of Oral Argumentation.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 30 (6): 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09921-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Aleixandre, M. P. 2011. “Argumentación y uso de pruebas: construcción, evaluación y comunicación de explicaciones en Biología y Geología [Argumentation and use of evidence: construction, evaluation and communication of explanations in Biology and Geology.” In En P. Cañal (coord.). Didáctica de la Biología y Geología [Didactics of Biology and Geology]. Madrid: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, P. 2010. 10 Ideas Clave. Competencias en Argumentación y Uso de Pruebas [Key ideas. Skills in argumentation and use of evidence] Vol. 12. Barcelona: Graó.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, P., and J. D. de Bustamante. 2003. ““Discurso de Aula y Argumentación En La Clase de Ciencias: Cuestiones Teóricas y Metodológicas.” [Classroom discourse and argumentation in the science classroom: Theoretical and methodological issues].” Enseñanza de las Ciencias 21 (3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3914.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A., M. Pilar, and , and B. Puig. 2012. “Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education edited by B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, 1001–1015. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1992. “Thinking as Argument.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (2): 155–179. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1993. “Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking.” Science Education 77 (3): 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Science as Argument.” Science Education 94 (5): 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., P. Freire, and C. Howe. 2014. “Science Teaching and Argumentation: One-Sided versus Dialectical Argumentation in Chilean Middle-School Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (6): 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., W. Ying‐Tien, and C. Tsai. 2009. “Research Trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A Content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (15): 1999–2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-C., T.-J. Lin, and C.-C. Tsai. 2014. “Research Trends in Science Education from 2008 to 2012: A Systematic Content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (8): 1346–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. V., and D. Heck. 2012. “How Do We Teach Argumentation in the New Australian Curriculum? Secondary Science Teachers Experiences in an Argumentation-Based Professional Development Program.” Teaching Science 58 (3): 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., and P. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in the Secondary Science Classroom. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S., L. Philips, and J. Osborne. 2007. “Scientific Inquiry: The Place of Interpretation and Argumentation.” In Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting, edited by J. Luft, R. L. Bell, and J. Gess-Newsome, 87–98. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., H. Borko, E. Fishman, F. Gomez Zaccarelli, K. C. B. Eric Berson, E. Reigh, and A. Tseng. 2019. “Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement with Scientific Argumentation.” American Educational Research Journal 56 (4): 1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, A. Christodoulou, C. Howell-Richardson, and K. Richardson. 2013. “Learning to Argue: A Study of Four Schools and Their Attempt to Develop the Use of Argumentation as a Common Instructional Practice and Its Impact on Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (3): 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, C. 2005. “L’argumentation: histoire, théorie et perspectives [The Argument: History, Theory and Perspectives].” Paris: Presses Universitaires de France: collection Que Sais-Je.
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, C. 2009. “A place for figures of speech in argumentation theory.” Argumentation, 23 (3): 325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and W. A. Sandoval. 2012. “Improvements to Elementary Children’s Epistemic Understanding from Sustained Argumentation.” Science Education 96 (3): 488–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martín, D. 2014. “Teoría fundamentada y Atlas.ti: recursos metodológicos para la investigación educative” [Grounded theory and Atlas.ti: methodological resources for educational research]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa 16 (1): 104–122. http://redie.uabc.mx/vol16no1/contenido-sanmartin.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sardà, J., A. María, and N. Sanmartí Puig. 2000. “Enseñar a Argumentar Científicamente: Un Reto de Las Clases de Ciencias.” [Teaching scientific argumentation: a challenge for science classes]. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas 18 (3): 405–422. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4028.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 235–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, C. 1992. Words, Science and Learning: Developing Science and Technology Education. 118. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X., D. M. Levin, A. K. Chumbley, and A. Elby. 2022. “Arguing About Argument and Evidence: Disagreements and Ambiguities in Science Education Research and Practice.” Science Education 106 (2): 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telenius, M., E. Yli-Panula, V.-M. Vesterinen, and M. Vauras. 2020. “Argumentation within Upper Secondary School Student Groups During Virtual Science Learning: Quality and Quantity of Spoken Argumentation.” Education Sciences 10 (12): 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C., and M. L. Wen. 2005. “Research and Trends in Science Education from 1998 to 2002: A Content Analysis of Publication in Selected Journals.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 2007. “Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre, 245–268. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_12.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and F. Nemet. 2002. “Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (1): 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar