Embedding epistemic insight (EI) in teacher training programmes in English universities: barriers and how to overcome them

References

• Alexander, R. 2010. Children, Their World, Their Education: The Final Report and Recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 1990. Politics and Policy Making in Educational Settings: Explorations in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B. 2016. “Ways to Prepare Future Teachers to Teach Science in Multicultural Classrooms.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (2): 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9701-9.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., and L. Hazeldine. 2020. “Shattering the Subject Silos: Learning About the Big Questions and Epistemic Insight, Impact.” Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching (9). May. https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/shattering-the-subject-silos-learning-about-big-questions-and-epistemic-insight/
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., and M. Nassaji. 2021. “Secondary School Students’ Reasoning About Science and Personhood.” Science & Education 30 (4): 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00199-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., M. Nassaji, and M. Abedin. 2017. “Entrenched Compartmentalisation and Students’ Abilities and Levels of Interest in Science.” School Science Review 99 (367): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., M. Nassaji, S. Fraser, and F. Lawson. 2018. “A Framework for Teaching Epistemic Insight in Schools.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9788-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., K. Taber, F. Riga, and H. Newdick. 2013. “Secondary School Students’ Epistemic Insight into the Relationships Between Science and Religion—A Preliminary Enquiry.” Research in Science Education 43 (4): 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9317-y.
   Google Scholar
• Boix Mansilla, V., and F. Chua. 2016. “Signature Pedagogies in Global Competence Education: Understanding Quality Teaching Practice.” Interdisciplinary and Global Studies–Internal Working Paper, Project Zero: Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://schd.ws/hosted_files/wissit2016/e1/VBM%20paper%20on%20Sign%20Ped.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boss, S., and J. Larmer. 2018. “Project Based Teaching: How to Create Rigorous and Engaging Learning Experiences.“ ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Boss, S., and J. Larmer. 2018. “Project Based Teaching: How to Create Rigorous and Engaging Learning Experiences.”
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, B., and J. Bragg. 2008. “Making Primary Connections: The Cross-Curriculum Story.” The Curriculum Journal 19 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170801903183.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• CIDREE, the Consortium of Institutions for Development and Research in Education in Europe. 2005. Cross-Curricular Themes in Secondary Education: Report of a CIDREE Collaborative Project. Sint-Katelijne-Waver (Belgium): CIDREE.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2014. “Thematic Analysis.” In Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, edited by T. Teo, 1947–1952. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311.
   Google Scholar
• Counsell, C. 2018. “Taking Curriculum Seriously.” Impact 4: 6–9. https://impact.chartered.college/article/taking-curriculum-seriously/.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2000. “The Political Construction of the “Whole Curriculum”.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (5): 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DES. 1987. “The NC: A Consultation Document.“ The National Curriculum 5-16–Consultation Document.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2010. The Importance of Teaching: The School White Paper. CM 7980. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2011. Training Our Next Generation of Outstanding Teachers. DfE-00038-2011. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, B., ed. 1990. The New Social Curriculum, a Guide to Cross-Curricular Themes. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. 2020. “Bringing Nuance to “The Science” in Public Policy and Science Understanding.“ 1. Science & Education 1.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, D. 2017. A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., and B. Y. Seung. 2016. “Educating Critical Thinkers: The Role of Epistemic Cognition; Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2011. Leading a Self-Improving School System. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Hasni, A., F. Bousadra, V. Belletête, A. Benabdallah, M.-C. Nicole, and N. Dumais. 2016. “Trends in Research on Project-Based Science and Technology Teaching and Learning at K–12 Levels: A Systematic Review.” Studies in Science Education 52 (2): 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., and C. Horrocks. 2010. Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., S. Blackwell, J. Drake, and K. A. Moran. 2014. “Taking a Leap of Faith: Redefining Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Through Project-Based Learning.“ Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, D. 2011. “Education of Teachers: The English Experience.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 37 (4): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.610988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D., and S. Frodsham. 2019. “Epistemic Insights: Contemplating Tensions Between Policy Influences and Creativity in School Science.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (4): 770–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCC (National Curriculum Council). 1989. Circular No.6. York: NCC.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%2005.04.2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2020. Knowledge for 2030. Accessed October 27, 2020. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/knowledge/Knowledge_for_2030_concept_note.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted.2008. Curriculum Innovation in Schools. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). 2019. “Education Inspection Framework.“ https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/education-inspection-framework.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, J. C., C. Morais, and L. Moreira. 2019. “If Neither from Evolution nor from the Bible, Where Does Tension Between Science and Religion Come From? Insights from a Survey with High School Students in a Roman Catholic Society.” In Science and Religion in Education, edited by B. Billingsley, K. Chappell, and M. J. Reiss, 277–290. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_21.
   Google Scholar
• Pumfrey, P. 1993. “Cross-Curricular Elements and the National Curriculum.” In Cross-Curricular Contexts: Themes and Dimensions in Secondary Schools, edited by G. Verma and P. Pumfrey, 10–31. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. 2019. “Broad? Balanced? Curriculum,? Impact.“ Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching, May. Accessed May 2021. https://impact.chartered.college/article/broad-balanced-curriculum/.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2018. “Spielman: I Don’t Want a ‘Pub Quiz’ Curriculum.“ TES, September 18. www.epistemicinsight.com.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, J. 2010. Cross-Curricular Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844205.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S., and I. Shirley. 2011. “History of Education.” In Professional Studies in Primary Education, edited by H. Cooper and S. Elton-Chalcraft, 3–17. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shefeld, R. S., J. J. Kurisunkal, and R. Koul. 2019. “Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn STEM Through a Makerspace Approach.” In Science Education in India, edited by R. Koul, G. Verma, and V. Nargund-Joshi, 181–207. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9593-2_10.
   Google Scholar
• Slomka, J. M. 2019. “Analysing the Nature of Ministry Guidelines for Developing Interdisciplinary Science Courses (Grades 11–12) in Ontario (Canada).” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 19 (4): 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00062-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, A. 2017. “Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of Interdisciplinary Pedagogy: The Case of Elementary Mathematics–Science Integrated Lessons.” Mathematics Education 49 (2): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0821-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sossick, M. 2020. “Epistemic Insight: Bringing Subject Disciplines Together.” Historical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, M., K. Gould, and B. Lee. 2000. Who Would Be a Teacher? A Review of Factors Motivating and Demotivating Prospective and Practising Teachers. NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, A. 2018. “I Do Not Want a ‘Pub Quiz’ Curriculum.“ https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/amanda-spielman-at-the-wonder-years-curriculum-conference.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. 2015. “Education Reform in England: Quality and Equity in the Performative School.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 19 (11): 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1044202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar