Inquiry project or inquiry stance? A continuum of teacher candidate perceptions of knowledge construction during practitioner inquiry-based clinical practice

References

• Acosta, M. M., and S. Duggins. 2021. “Growth Through Crisis: Preservice Teachers Learning to Enact Culturally Relevant Literacy Teaching.” Action in Teacher Education 43 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1926371.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. 2018. A Pivot Toward Clinical Practice, Its Lexicon, and the Renewal of Educator Preparation: A Report of the AACTE Clinical Practice Commission. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. https://aacte.org/resources/research-reports-and-briefs/clinical-practice-commission-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Barnatt, J. 2009. “Finding the Questions: A Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study of Pre-Service Practitioner Inquiry.” PhD diss., Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Braaten, M. L. 2011. “Developing Inquiry-as-Stance and Repertoires of Practice: Teacher Learning Across Two Settings.” PhD diss., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M., and M. Ní Ríordáin. 2015. “Navigating Layers of Teacher Uncertainty Among Preservice Science and Mathematics Teachers Engaged in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 23 (4): 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1045537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. L., W. Chia Liu, and S. S. Y. Chia. 2018. “Teacher Identity, Professional Practices, and Inquiry (PPI) in Teacher Education.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Education 38 (4): 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1536602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. K., and L. Andreasen. 2020. “Exploring Elementary Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Beliefs: Are We Preparing Teachers to Teach Culturally Diverse Students?” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 49 (1): 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1777528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, C. 2017. “Crafting Curriculum in Preservice Teacher Education.” Curriculum & Teaching 32 (2): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/32.2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, R., M. L. Veal, M. Johnson, and P. Holland. 1990. “Restructuring Teacher Education Through Collaborative Action Research.” Journal of Teacher Education 41 (2): 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. 2015. “Teacher Communities for Equity.” Kappa Delta Pi Record 51 (3): 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2015.1056659.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1993. Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1999. “Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities.” Review of Research in Education 24 (1): 249–305. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. 2019. “2013 CAEP Standards.” http://caepnet.org/~/media/Files/caep/standards/caep-standards-one-pager-0219.pdf?la=en.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F. 2015. “Understanding Inquiry as Stance: Illustration and Analysis of One Teacher Researcher’s Work.” Learning Landscapes 8 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v8i2.702.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F. 2016. “The Relevancy and Importance of Practitioner Research in Contemporary Times.” Journal of Practitioner Research 1 (1): 1–7. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpr/vol1/iss1/1?utm_source=scholarcommons.usf.edu%2Fjpr%2Fvol1%2Fiss1%2F1&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., and D. Yendol-Hoppey. 2020. The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn Through Practitioner Inquiry. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., J. Oakes, S. K. Wojcikiewicz, M. E. Hyler, R. Guha, A. Podolsky, T. Kini, C. M. Cook-Harvey, C. N. Jackson Mercer, and A. Harrell. 2019. “Preparing Teachers for Deeper Learning.” Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Preparing_Teachers_Deeper_Learning_BRIEF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. V., R. W. Burns, K. Tricarico, S. van Ingen, J. Jacobs, and J. Davis. 2017. “Problematizing Clinical Education: What is Our Future?” In The Power of Clinical Preparation in Teacher Education: Embedding Teacher Preparation within P-12 School Contexts, edited by R. Flessner and D. R. Lecklider, 1–20. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dodman, S., L. Groth, S. Ra, A. Baker, and S. Ramezan. 2017. “Developing an Inquiry Stance Through PDS Action Research: Does It Maintain After Graduation?” School-University Partnerships 10 (4): 30–46. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2322041879?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
   Google Scholar
• Durdella, N. 2019. Qualitative Dissertation Methodology: A Guide for Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, L. 2020. “Walking on a Tightrope: Agency and Accountability in Practitioner Inquiry in New Zealand Secondary Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education 93:93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). “The European Qualifications Framework: Supporting Learning, Work and Cross-Border Mobility.” http://www.ec.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. 2012. Teachers as Learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grudnoff, L., M. Haigh, M. Hill, M. Cochran-Smith, F. Ell, and L. Ludlow. 2016. “Rethinking Initial Teacher Education: Preparing Teachers for Schools in Low Socio-Economic Communities in New Zealand.” Journal of Education for Teaching 42 (4): 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1215552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. 1997. “Theory-Led Thematic Analysis: Social Identification in Small Companies.” In Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology, edited by N. Hayes, 93–114. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jhagroo, J., S. Bansilal, and P. Stringer. 2021. “Teacher Learning Insights from Two Practice-Based Inquiries in South Africa and New Zealand.” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 56 (1): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00184-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinskey, M. 2018. “Using Action Research to Improve Science Teaching Self-Efficacy.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (15): 1795–1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1502898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, R., and S. Sullivan. 2022. “Developing a Framework for Initial Teacher Education: Route Map or Reflective Tool?” Journal of Education for Teaching 42 (2): 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1985938.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton-Sticklor, N., and S. F. Bodamer. 2016. “Learning to Take an Inquiry Stance in Teacher Research: An Exploration of Unstructured Thought-Partner Spaces.” The Educational Forum 80 (4): 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2016.1206161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston, D. P., and K. M. Zeichner. 1990. “Reflective Teaching and Action Research in Preservice Teacher Education.” Journal of Education for Teaching 16 (3): 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747900160304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, C. C. 2016. “Teaching Emerging Teacher Researchers: Examining a District-Based Professional Development Course.” Teaching Education 27 (1): 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2015.1042855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2020. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., I. Oosterheert, L. Scholte Lubberink, and E. Denessen. 2020. “The Position of Student Teacher Practitioner Research in Teacher Education: Teacher Educators’ Perspectives.” Educational Action Research 30 (3): 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1857811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, L. 2021a. “Toward a Theory of Action for Practitioner Inquiry as Professional Development in Preservice Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 97:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, L. 2021b. “A Case Study of Inquiry as Stance Among Teacher Candidates Conducting Practitioner Inquiry in a Professional Development School.” PhD diss., The Pennsylvania State University. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/21388lbr5136.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, T. M., S. de Vries, S. Lin Goei, and K. van Veen. 2019. “Promoting a Professional School Culture Through Lesson Study? An Examination of School Culture, School Conditions, and Teacher Self-Efficacy.” Professional Development in Education 46 (1): 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Belt, H. 2003. “How to Engage with Experimental Practices? Moderate Versus Radical Constructivism.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2): 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000005084.59666.b6.
   Google Scholar
• van Katwijk, L., E. Jansen, and K. van Veen. 2021a. “Development of an Inquiry Stance? Perceptions of Preservice Teachers and Teacher Educators Toward Preservice Teacher Inquiry in Dutch Primary Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 73 (3): 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211013750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Katwijk, L., E. Jansen, and K. van Veen. 2021b. “Pre-Service Teacher Research: A Way to Future-Proof Teachers?” European Journal of Teacher Education 46 (3): 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willegems, V., E. Consuegra, K. Struyven, and N. Engels. 2018. “Pre-Service Teachers as Members of a Collaborative Teacher Research Team: A Steady Track to Extended Professionalism?” Teaching and Teacher Education 76:126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenhauer, R., and A. Hooser. 2017. ““Inquiry is Confidence”: How Practitioner Inquiry Can Support New Teachers.” Journal of Practitioner Research 2 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5038/2379-9951.2.1.1028.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkenhauer, R., and A. Hooser. 2021. “Becoming Clinically Grounded Teacher Educators: Inquiry Communities in Clinical Teacher Preparation.” Journal of Teacher Education 72 (2): 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120915865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yendol-Hoppey, D., J. Jacobs, and R. W. Burns. 2019. “Improving Teacher Practice-Based Knowledge: What Teachers Need to Know and How They Come to Know It.” In The Wiley Handbook of Educational Supervision, edited by J. A. Ponticell and S. J. Zepeda, 511–532. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar