Teacher self‐evaluation and power

References

• Airasian , P.W. and Gullickson , A.R. 1997 . Teacher self‐evaluation tool kit , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Altan , M.Z. 1999 . Teachers as the agents of change . Modern English Teacher , 8 ( 3 ) : 7 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Arbizu , F. , Olalde , C. and Del Castillo , L. 1998 . The self‐evaluation of teachers: A strategy for the improvement of teaching at higher education level . Higher Education in Europe , 23 ( 3 ) : 351 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Blasé , J. and Blasé , J. 1999 . Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers' perspectives . Educational Administration Quarterly , 35 ( 3 ) : 349 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasé , J. and Blasé , J. 2002 . The micropolitics of instructional supervision . Educational Administration Quarterly , 38 ( 1 ) : 6 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocock , B.J. 1986 . Hegemony , London : Tavistock .
   Google Scholar
• Clegg , S.R. 1989 . Frameworks of power , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Cranton , P. 2001 . Interpretive and critical evaluation . New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 88 : 11 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• Dahl , R.A. 1957 . The concept of power . Behavioural Science , 2 : 201
   Google Scholar
• Embery , C. 1996 . Appraisal: Monitoring and evaluating its progress . Educational Research , 38 ( 2 ) : 123 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleave , D. 1997 . Bifocals for teacher development and appraisal . Journal of Curriculum & Supervision , 12 ( 3 ) : 269 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Gore , J.M. 1995 . “ Foucault's poststructuralism and observational education research: A study of power relations ” . In After postmodernism: Education, politics and identity , Edited by: Smith , R. and Wexler , P. 98 – 111 . London : Falmer Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci , A. 1971 . Selections from the prison notebooks , London : Lawrence and Wishart .
   Google Scholar
• Haggarty , L. 2004 . An alternative vision for the thoughtful teacher (Thematic Review) . British Educational Research Journal , 30 ( 4 ) : 591 – 600 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell , C. and Annetts , S. 2009 . Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy‐holding complacency? . Innovations in Education & Training International , 46 ( 1 ) : 61 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapper , C. 2001 . Broadening our approach to teaching evaluation . New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 88 : 3 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Leach , L. , Neutze , G. and Zepke , N. 2000 . Learners' perceptions of assessment: Tensions between philosophy and practice . Studies in the Education of Adults , 32 ( 1 ) : 107 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Martin , B. 1998 . “ Tied knowledge: Power in higher education ” . University of Wollongong . http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/98tk/
   Google Scholar
• Munson , B.R. 1998 . Peers observing peers: The better way to observe teachers . Contemporary Education , 69 ( 2 ) : 108 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Muzevich , K. 1997 . Teacher observations: Engaging in self‐reflection . Reading Today , 14 ( 3 ) : 16 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Powell , G. 1999 . How to avoid being the fly on the wall . The Teacher Trainer , 13 ( 1 ) : 3 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Quirke , P. 1996 . Using unseen observations for an in‐service teacher development programme . The Teacher Trainer , 10 ( 1 ) : 18 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds , M. and Trehan , K. 2000 . Assessment: A critical perspective . Studies in Higher Education , 25 ( 3 ) : 267 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinvolucri , M. 1988 . A role‐switching exercise in teacher‐training . Modern English Teacher , : 20 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg , R.A. and Fenner , M. 1991 . Teacher perceptions of teacher assessment . Clearing House , 64 ( 4 ) : 272 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Sahakian , P. and Stockton , J. 1996 . Opening doors: Teacher‐guided observations . Educational Leadership , 53 ( 6 ) : 50 – 4 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven , M. 1981 . Evaluation thesaurus. , 3rd ed. , Inverness, CA : Edgepress .
   Google Scholar
• Shortland , S. 2004 . Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance? . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 28 ( 2 ) : 219 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Starratt , R.J. 1992 . After supervision . Journal of Curriculum and Supervision , 8 ( 1 ) : 77 – 86 .
   Google Scholar
• Strain , M. 2009 . Some ethical and cultural implications of the leadership ‘turn’ in education: On the distinction between performance and performativity . Educational Management Administration & Leadership , 37 ( 1 ) : 67 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan , K.H.K. 2004 . Does student self‐assessment empower or discipline students? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 6 ) : 651 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Taras , M. 2008 . Issues of power and equity in two models of self‐assessment . Teaching in Higher Education , 13 ( 1 ) : 81 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher , R. and Edwards , R. 1994 . Postmodernism and education , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Whitt , J.A. 1979 . Towards a class‐dialectical model of power: An empirical assessment of three competing models of political power . American Sociological Review , 44 : 81 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman , T.M. and Niles , J.A. 1987 . Essentials of professional growth . Educational Leadership , 44 ( 5 ) : 4 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke , N. 2007 . Leadership, power and activity systems in a higher education context: Will distributive leadership serve in an accountability driven world? . International Journal of Leadership in Education , 10 ( 3 ) : 301 – 14 .
   Google Scholar