Vulnerability and protection talk: Systemic therapy process with people with intellectual disability

References

• Andersen, T.The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about the dialogues. London, UK: Norton (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. Interviewing persons with a learning disability: How setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores. Qualitative Health Research, (1999). 9, 437–454. doi:10.1177/104973239900900402
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Young, N., & Finlay, M. Shaping clients' answers: Departing from neutrality in care-staff interviews with people with a learning disability. Disability & Society, (2002). 17, 435–455. doi:10.1080/09687590220140368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminen, I. Conversation analysis: A quest for order in social interaction and language use. Acta Sociologica, (1999). 42, 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M.,Heritage, J.Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysisCambridge University PressCambridge, UK1984
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S.,, Lynggaard, H.Intellectual disabilities: A systemic approachLondon, UK: Karnac Books (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Cross, L. Basic concepts in family therapy: An introductory text 2nd ed.Binghamton, NY:Haworth Press. (2000)
   Google Scholar
• Branston, P., Fogarty, G., & Cummins, R. A. The nature of stressors reported by people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, (1999). 12, 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00046.x
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. B. Family therapy: First steps towards a systemic approachNew York, NY:Routledge. (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. Approach-method-technique: Making distinctions and creating connections. Human Systems, (1992). 3, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., & Kagan, C. Decoding Valuing People. Disability & Society, (2006). 21, 299–313. doi:10.1080/09687590600679899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttny, R. Therapeutic humor in retelling the client's tellings. Text, (2001). 21, 303–326.
   Google Scholar
• Byng-Hall, J. Rewriting family scripts: Improvisation and systems changeNew York, NY:Guilford Press. (1995)
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (1993). 26, 157–177. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_3
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. Evolving guidelines for the publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, (1999). 38, 215–229. doi:10.1348/014466599162782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidell, B. Making family therapy user-friendly for learning disabled clients. Context, (1996). 26, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fidell, B. Exploring the use of family therapy with adults with a learning disability. Journal of Family Therapy, (2000). 22, 308–323. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00154
   Google Scholar
• Fisch, R., Weakland, J. H., & Segal, L. The tactics of change: Doing therapy brieflySan Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass. (1982)
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, D., & Penn, C. Conversation analysis as a technique for exploring the dynamics of a mediated interview. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, (2003). 38, 95–111. doi:10.1080/13682820304811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., & Marrs, A. L. Responding to blame in family therapy: A constructionist/narrative perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, (2000). 28, 133–146. doi:10.1080/019261800261716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, J., & Newfield, N. A conversation analysis of a solution-focused marital therapy session. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, (1992). 18, 153–165. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1992.tb00926.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillman, M., Swain, J., & Heyman, B. Life history or ‘case’ history: The objectification of people with learning difficulties through the tyranny of professional discourses. Disability & Society, (1997). 12, 675–694. doi:10.1080/09687599726985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D., Magrill, L., Hale, J., Damaskinidou, K., Paul, J., & Tham, S. Protection and loss: Working with learning-disabled adults and their families. Journal of Family Therapy, (1995). 17, 263–280. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, M., van Berkum, G., Reijnders, R., & Heller, T. Differences in service needs, time demands, and caregiving burden among parents of persons with mental retardation across the life cycle. Family Relations, (1997). 46, 417–425. doi:10.2307/585101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, (1992). 83, 97–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. Foundations of family therapy: A conceptual framework for systems changeNew York, NY:Basic Books. (1981)
   Google Scholar
• Hornby, N. A long way downNew York, NY:Riverhead Books. (2005)
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. Conversation analysis: Principles, practices, and applicationsCambridge, UK:Polity Press. (1998)
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. Notes on latency in overlap onset. Human Studies, (1986). 9, 153–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. Is ‘no’ an acknowledgement token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(−) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, (2002). 34, 1345–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., Hatton, C., Johnson, S. D., O'Kelly, C. M. E. People with learning disabilities as witnesses in court: What questions should lawyers ask?. British Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, (2001). 29, 98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, S. M., & Gale, J. E. Decentering therapy: Textual analysis of a narrative therapy session. Family Process, (1997). 36, 101–126. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00101.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodologyNewbury Park, CA:Sage. (1980)
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, H., & Dallos, R. First session solution-focused brief therapy with families who have a child with severe intellectual disabilities: Mothers' experiences and views. Journal of Family Therapy, (2008). 30, 5–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, H., & Scior, K. Narrative therapy and people with learning disabilities. Clinical Psychology, (2002). 17, 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• McConachie, H. Implications of a model of stress and coping for services to families of young disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development, (1994). 20, 37–46. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.1994.tb00373.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapyLondon, UK:Sage. (2001)
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S. Families and family therapyCambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. (1974)
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. Family therapy techniquesCambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. (1981)
   Google Scholar
• Pilnick, A., Clegg, J., Murphy, E., & Almack, K. Questioning the answer: Questioning style, choice and self-determination in interactions with young people with intellectual disabilities. Sociology of Health & Illness, (2010). 32, 415–436. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01223.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pote, H. Therapists' accounts of the process of systemic family therapy with people with learning disabilities and their families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Salomons, Canterbury Christ Church University, Tunbridge Wells, UK, (2002)
   Google Scholar
• Pote, H. The practitioner's position in relation to systemic work in ID contexts. Intellectual disabilities: A systemic approach Baum, S., & Lynggaard, H. London, UK:Karnac. (2006) pp. 164–185.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviourLondon, UK:Sage. (1987)
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of ‘being intellectually disabled.’. Disability & Society, (1998). 13, 807–827. doi:10.1080/09687599826524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, A. Family therapy and learning difficulties: A case discussion. Context, (1996). 29, 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (1974). 50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. Hypothesizing—circularity—neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, (1980). 19, 3–12. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1980.00003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway, D. R. Michel FoucaultBoston, MA:Twayne. (1989)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods Murray, M., & Chamberlain, K. London, UK:Sage. (1999) pp. 218–240.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniquesNewbury Park, CA:Sage. (1990)
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, D., Shavelle, R., Anderson, T. W., & Baumeister, A. External causes of death among persons with developmental disability: The effect of residential placement. American Journal of Epidemiology, (1998). 147, 855–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, (1993). 13, 593–618. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(93)90048-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. Evaluating qualitative research. Evidence-Based Mental Health, (1999). 2, 99–101. doi:10.1136/ebmh.2.4.99
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M. The problem of mental deficiency: Eugenics, democracy, and social policy in Britain, c.1870–1959Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press. (1998) pp. 1870–1959.
   Google Scholar
• Tilden, T., & Dattilio, F. M. Vulnerability schemas of individuals in couples relationships: A cognitive perspective. Contemporary Family Therapy, (2005). 27, 139–162. doi:10.1007/s10591-005-4036-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomson, T., Beghi, E., Sundqvist, A., & Johannessen, S. I. Medical risks in epilepsy: A review with focus on physical injuries, mortality, traffic accidents and their prevention. Epilepsy Research, (2004). 60, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. Basic content analysis: Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences (series no. 07–049)Newbury Park, CA:Sage. (1990)
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & Epston, D. Narrative means to therapeutic endsNew York, NY:Norton. (1990)
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, I., Smith, P. K., & Thompson, D. Bullying and children with special educational needs. School bullying: Insights and perspectives K. Smith, P., & Sharp, S. London, UK:Routledge. (1994) pp. 213–240.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, (2000). 15, 215–228. doi:10.1080/08870440008400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods A. Smith, J. London, UK:Sage. (2008) pp. 235–251.
   Google Scholar