Group treatment for men with intellectual disability and sexually abusive behaviour: Service user views

References

• Azmi S., Hatton C., Emerson E., Caine A. Listening to adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities from south Asian communities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1997; 10: 250–263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber M., Jenkins R., Jones C. A survivor's group for women who have a learning disability. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 2000; 46((1))31–41, No. 90,
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett A., Canvin K. User views and ethical issues in qualitative methods. Ethical issues in forensic mental health research, Adshead G, Brown C. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London 2003; 58–71
   Google Scholar
• Brown H., Thompson D. The ethics of research with men who have learning disabilities and abusive sexual behaviour: A minefield in a vacuum. Disability & Society 1997; 12: 695–707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchard S. N., Pine J., Gordon L. R. Manager competence, program normalization and client satisfaction in group homes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 1990; 25: 277–285
   Google Scholar
• Clare I. C. H., Gudjonsson G. H. Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1993; 32: 295–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements J. General cognitive functioning. Severe learning disability and psychological handicap, Clements J. Wiley, Chichester 1987; 19–42
   Google Scholar
• Crocker T. M. Assessing consumer satisfaction with mental handicap services: A comparison between different approaches. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1989; 35((2))94–100, No. 69,
   Google Scholar
• Dagnan D., Jones J., McEvoy J. Referrer satisfaction with a community team for people with learning disabilities. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1993; 39((2))95–103, No. 77
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Valuing People: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. The Stationery Office, London 2001, [CM5086]
   Google Scholar
• Dudley J. R., Calhoun M. L., Ahlgrim‐Delzell L., Conroy J. Measuring the consumer satisfaction of class members of a lawsuit. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1998; 42: 199–207
   Google Scholar
• Felce D., Perry J. Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1995; 16: 51–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor D. A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Finlay W. M. L., Lyons E. Acquiescence in interviews with people who have mental retardation. Mental Retardation 2002; 40: 14–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn M. C. Adults who are mentally handicapped as consumers: Issues and guidelines for interviewing. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 1986; 30: 369–377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn M., Bernard J. Deep trouble! Adults with learning disabilities who offend. National Development Team, Manchester 1999
   Google Scholar
• Flynn M., Griffiths S., Byrne L., Hynes K. ‘I'm stuck here with my poxy star chart.’ Listening to mentally disordered offenders with learning disabilities. Empowerment in everyday life: Learning disability, Ramcharan P, Roberts G, Grant G, Borland J. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London 1997; 144–155
   Google Scholar
• Flynn M. C., Saleem J. K. Adults who are mentally handicapped and living with their parents: Satisfaction and perceptions regarding their lives and circumstances. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 1986; 30: 379–387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox P., Emerson E. Socially valid outcomes of intervention for people with MR and challenging behavior: Views of different stakeholders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2001; 3: 183–189
   Google Scholar
• Hayes S. Sex offenders. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1991; 17: 221–227
   Google Scholar
• Hayes S. Justice for all? Advocacy, people with learning difficulties, crime and the law. Innovations in advocacy and empowerment for people with intellectual disabilities, Ward L. Lisieux Hall Publications, Lancashire 1998; 245–263
   Google Scholar
• Holland A., Meddis R. People living in community homes: Their views. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 1997; 25: 68–72
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay W. R., Law J., Quinn K., Smart N., Smith A. H. W. A comparison of physical and sexual abuse histories: Sexual and non‐sexual offenders with intellectual disability. Child Abuse and Neglect 2001; 25: 989–995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe K. Community‐based service – what consumers think. The British Journal of Mental Subnormality 1992; 38((1))6–14, No. 74
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald J., Sinason V., Hollins S. An interview study of people with learning disabilities' experience of, and satisfaction with, group analytic therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 2003; 76: 433–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall W. L., Anderson D., Fernandez Y. Cognitive‐behavioural treatment of sex offenders. Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1999
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie K., Murray G. C., Matheson E. An examination of the importance of aspects of services to people with a learning disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 1999; 27: 25–29
   Google Scholar
• McVilly K. R. Interviewing people with a learning disability about their residential service. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 1995; 23: 138–142
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Act. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Miller A. B., Keys C. B. Awareness, action, and collaboration: How the Self‐Advocacy Movement is empowering for persons with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation 1996; 34((5))312–319
   Google Scholar
• Murphy G. H., Estien D., Clare I. C. H. Services for people with mild intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: Service‐user views. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1996; 9((3))256–283
   Google Scholar
• Murphy G. H., Sinclair N., Hays S. ‐J., Heaton K., SOTSEC‐ID Group. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural treatment for men with learning disabilities at risk of sexual offending.. British Institute of Learning Disabilities, Department of Health Learning Disability Research Initiative. 2006, (Final Report to the Department of Health)
   Google Scholar
• Prosser H., Bromley J. Interviewing people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical psychology and people with intellectual disabilities, Emerson E, Hatton C, Bromley J, Caine A. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1998; 99–113
   Google Scholar
• Ramcharan P., Grant G. Views and experiences of people with intellectual disabilities and their families. (1) The user perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2001; 14: 348–363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler J. M. Assessment of children. Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc, La Mesa, CA 1992, (3rd ed., revised)
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman C., Budd E., Winer J., Schoenrock C., Martin P. Evaluating alternative techniques of questioning mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1982; 86: 511–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair N., Booth S. ‐J., Murphy G. H. Cognitive behavioural treatment for men with intellectual disabilities who are at risk of sexual offending. 2002, (Unpublished manuscript)
   Google Scholar
• Smyly S. R., Elsworth J. D. Interviewing clients: A project to explore client views about a change in service provision. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 1997; 25: 64–67
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D., Brown H. Men with intellectual disabilities who sexually abuse: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1997; 10: 140–158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witts P., Gibson K. B. Satisfaction with an adult learning disability community support team. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1997; 10: 41–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar