Gendered institutional research cultures in science: the post-doc transition for women scientists

References

• Bailyn, L. (2006). Breaking the mold: Redesigning work for productive and satisfying lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benokraitis, N. V. (1997). Sex discrimination in the 21st century. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 5–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Benokraitis, N. V., & Feagin, J. R. (1986). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bilimoria, D., & Liang, X. (2012). Gender equity in science and engineering: Advancing change in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L. (2012). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641. doi:10.1177/0001839212439994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J. (2007). Women and minorities in STEM: A primer. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Ed.) Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 3–27). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. S. (1990). Communication styles in higher education: Differences between academic men and women. In L. Welch (Ed.), Women in higher education: Changes and challenges. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. S. (1994). Men and women at work: Gender differences in communication styles. In M. Davidson & R. Burke (Eds.), Women in management: Current research issues (pp. 135–166). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. S. (1995). Gender, language, and the professions: Recognition of wide-verbal repertoire speech. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 25(2), 149–192.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. S., & Thompson, L. (1995). Gender differences in student development. In R. E. Boyatzis, S. S. Cowen, & D. A. Kolb (Eds.), Innovation in professional education: Steps on a journey from teaching to learning (pp. 135–166). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339. doi:10.1086/511799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, F. J., Williams, J. C., & Biernat, M. (2004). The maternal wall. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 675–682. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, D. J., & Fleckenstein, A. (2007). Keys to success for women in science. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 28–46). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L., & Gross, G. (2012). Feminist qualitative interviewing: Experience, talk, and possibilities. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (2nd ed., pp. 206–236). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drago, R. W. (2007). Striking a balance: Work, family, life. Boston, MA: Dollars & Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–94). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. (2007). Overcoming resistance to women leaders. In B. Kellerman. & D. Rhode (Eds.), In women and leadership: The state of play and strategies for change (pp. 127–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., & Rhode, D. L. (2010). Women and leadership: Defining the challenges. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 377–410). Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2008). Institutional transformation and the advancement of women faculty: The case of academic science and engineering. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 73–103). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., Frasch, K., & Mason, M. A. (2009). Staying competitive: Patching America's leaky pipeline in the sciences. Retrieved, from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/11/women_and_sciences.html
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men's and women's experiences. Human Relations, 40(2), 97–115. doi:10.1177/001872678704000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammonds, E., & Subramaniam, B. (2003). A conversation on feminist science studies. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 923–944. doi:10.1086/345455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. L. (2007). Feminist research practice: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, S., Luce, C., Servon, L., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering and technology. Boston: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, N. (1999). The study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT, MIT Faculty Newsletter, IX, 4. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447. doi:10.2307/2393451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• June, A. W. (2012). Work–life balance is out of reach for many scientists, and not just women. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 23, A29.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, A. J. (2006). The graduate experience of women in STEM and how it could be improved. In J. M. Bystydzienski & S. R. Bird (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 237–253). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., … Cohen-Fix, O. (2007). Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 977–981. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2002). Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe, November–December. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02nd/02ndmas.html
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Biological, social and organizational components of success for women in academic science and engineering, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741.html
   Google Scholar
• NPA Advance. (2011). Postdoctoral scholars, gender, and the academic career pipeline: A fact sheet. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from www.nationalpostdoc.org/advance.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, M. (2008). Challenges of the faculty career for women: Success and sacrifice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, A.E. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York, NY: Russell Sage
   Google Scholar
• Ragins, B. (1998). Gender and mentoring relationships: A review and research agenda in the next decade. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 374–369). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. K., & Pruitt, B. H. (2002). Beyond work–family balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. (1993). Gender, status and the social psychology of expectations. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 175–198). New York, NY: Aldine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. V. (2006). Using POWRE to ADVANCE: Institutional barriers identified by women scientists and engineers. In J. M. Bystydzienski & S. R. Bird (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 69–92). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. V., & Taylor, M. Z. (2009). Why are we still worried about women in science? Academe, 95(3), 327–346.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L., Henderson, A. D., & Gilmartin, S. K. (2008). Dual-career academic couples: What universities need to know. Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/gender/ResearchPrograms/DualCareer/ualCareerFinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., Malley, J. E., & LaVaque-Manty, D. (2007). Transforming science and engineering: Advancing academic women. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (2006). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. In J. M. Bystydzienski & S. R. Bird (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 320–332). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work–family debate: Why men and class matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Bornstein, S. (2008). The evolution of “Fred”: Family responsibilities discrimination and developments in the law of stereotyping and implicit bias. Hastings Law Journal, 59(6), 1311–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Segal, N. (2003). Beyond the maternal wall: Relief for family caregivers who are discriminated against on the job. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 26, 77–162.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, A., Jakobsen, J. R., & Fosado, G. (2007). Women, work, and the academy: Strategies for responding to ‘post-civil rights era’ gender discrimination. New York, NY: Barnard Center for Research on Women. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/aw26/WorkplaceEquity/BCRW-WomenWorkAcademy_08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar