The relevance of place and family stage for styles of community involvement

References

• Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces, 75, 1149–1182. doi:10.1093/sf/75.4.1149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, P. E., & Dhingra, P. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–335. doi:10.2307/3712353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, P. E., & Hofmeister, H. (2001). Work, family, and religious involvement for men and women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 707–722. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, E. (1956). Urban families: Conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations, 8, 345–384. doi:10.1177/001872675500800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, E. (1957). Family and social networks. London: Tavistock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Saracino, J. (2004). Social preservationists and the quest for authentic community. City & Community, 3, 135–156. doi:10.1111/j.1535-6841.2004.00073.x
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time. Social Forces, 70, 1077–1100. doi:10.1093/sf/70.4.1077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, P. (1980). Joiners and non-joiners: A South Indian city suburb and its women club. Sociological Bulletin, 29, 206–221.
   Google Scholar
• Caplow, T., Bahr, H. M., & Chadwick, B. A. (1983). All faithful people: Change and continuity in middletown's religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplow, T., Bahr, H. M., Chadwick, B. A., Hill, R., & Williamson, M. H. (1982). Middletown families: Fifty years of change and continuity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1985). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap (Harvard).
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser, L. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, R. B., & Lyon, L. (2002). Are virtual communities true communities? Examining the environments and elements of community. City & Community, 1, 373–390. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00031
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, P. (2005). Religion and family in a changing society: The transformation of linked institutions (Series in Cultural Sociology, DiMaggio, Lamont, Wuthnow, Zelizer [Eds.]). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, P. (2006). The religion and family project. Penny Edgell (Becker), director. Hartford Seminary, Hartford Institute for Religion Research. D. A. Roozen (Ed.). Retrieved from http://hirr.hartsem.edu/research/edgell-projectindex.html
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. (2002). Ever-more rooted Americans. City & Community, 1, 177–198. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00016
   Google Scholar
• Foster-Fishman, P. G., Cantillon, D., Pierce, S. J., & Van Egeren, L. A. (2007). Building an active citizenry: the role of neighborhood problems, readiness, and capacity for change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1–2), 91–106. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9097-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, M. R. (2011). Exploration of a progressive generation: Millenial elected officials and community activists. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: The good, the bad, and the greedy. Contexts, 5(4), 16–21. doi:10.1525/ctx.2006.5.4.16
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles–I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 281–306. doi:10.2307/2391000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–33. doi:10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A. M., & Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 92–111. doi:10.1177/10780879922184301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, P. (1992). Religion and personal autonomy: The third disestablishment in America. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic communities: The persistence and change of Chicago's local community. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer, W. (1984). Women volunteering: The pleasure, pain, and politics of unpaid work from 1830 to the present. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1995). World class: Thriving locally in the global economy. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, A. L., Reese, D. D., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The Information Society, 21(2), 119–131. doi:10.1080/01972240590925320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerbel, M. R., & Bloom, J. D. (2005). Blog for America and civic involvement. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 3–27. doi:10.1177/1081180X05281395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopata, H. Z. (1994). Circles and settings: Role changes of American women. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1957). Middletown: A study in modern American culture. San Diego, CA: A Harvest/HBJ Book.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, P. H. (1965). An approach to urban sociology. Trowbridge and London: Redwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, A. M., Sherraden, M. S., & Pritzker, S. (2006). Civic engagement among low-income and low-wealth families: In their words. Family Relations, 55, 152–162. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00366.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1982). Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 883–904. doi:10.1086/227525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55, 726–735. doi:10.2307/2095868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcel, T. L., & Menaghan, E. G. (1994a). Early parental work, family social capital, and early childhood outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 972–1010. doi:10.1086/230369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcel, T. L., & Menaghan, E. G. (1994b). Parents' jobs and children's lives. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, D. (2013). U.S. politics and generation Y: Engaging the millenials. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “Disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141–162. doi:10.1080/105846001750322952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 363–394. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1996). Unravelling from above. The American Prospect, 25(March–April), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., & Fullerton, A. S. (2009). The network structure of local and extra-local voluntary participation: The role of core social networks. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 553–575. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanstrom, T., Dreier, P., & Mollenkopf, J., (2002). Economic inequality and public policy: The power of place. City & Community, 1, 349–372. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00030
   Google Scholar
• Tatarchevskiy, T. (2011). The ‘popular’ culture of internet activism. New Media & Society, 13, 297–313. doi:10.1177/1461444810372785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timberlake, J. (2002). Separate, but how Unequal? Ethnic Residential Stratification, 1980–1990. City & Community, 1, 251–266. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00022
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, L. (1999). Using kin for child care: Embedment in the socioeconomic networks of extended families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 845–858. doi:10.2307/354007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455. doi:10.1177/00027640121957286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, G. C., Dykstra, P. A., Melkas, T., & Knipscheer, K. C. P. M. (2007). Social embeddedness and late-life parenthood: Community activity, close ties, and support networks. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1419–1456. doi:10.1177/0192513X07303895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713. doi:10.2307/2657355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America's fragmented communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar