Spousal resources and relationship quality in eight European countries

References

• Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 571–614. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214. doi: 10.1086/378341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Boertien, D., & Härkönen, J. (2018). Why does women’s education stabilize marriages? The role of marital attraction and barriers to divorce. Demographic Research, 38, 1241–1276. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 168–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652–688. doi: 10.1086/230577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. P. (2006). Policy, preferences, and patriarchy: The division of domestic labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 13(1), 117–143. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxj005
   Google Scholar
• Doorten, I. (2008). The division of unpaid work in the household: A stubborn pattern? Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra, P. A., & Poortman, A.-R. (2010). Economic resources and remaining single: Trends over time. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 277–290. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckhaut, M. C. W., Van de Putte, B., Gerris, J. R. M., & Vermulst, A. A. (2013). Analysing the effect of educational differences between partners: A methodological/theoretical comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 60–73. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P., & Kilbourne, B. (1990). Markets, marriages, and other mates: The problem of power. In R. Friedland & S. Robertson (Eds.), Beyond the marketplace: Rethinking economy and society (pp. 163–188). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, M. (2007). Does status inconsistency matter for marital quality? Journal of Family Issues, 28(12), 1582–1610. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07300708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, T. N. (1996a). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029–1042. doi: 10.1093/sf/74.3.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, T. N. (1996b). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(3), 585–595. doi: 10.2307/353719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajdu, G., & Hajdu, T. (2018). Intra-couple income distribution and subjective well-being: The moderating effect of gender norms. European Sociological Review, 34(2), 138–156. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcy006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, J. H., Geist, C., & Lucas, A. (2014). His and hers: Economic factors and relationship quality in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 728–743. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (1990). No exit, no voice: Women’s economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica, 33(3), 235–250. doi: 10.1177/000169939003300305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1980). Considering divorce: An expansion of Becker’s theory of marital instability. American Journal of Sociology, 86(1), 75–89. doi: 10.1086/227203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 506–531. doi: 10.1086/230545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139–158. doi: 10.1257/jep.10.4.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever, M., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2001). Reexamining the economic costs of marital disruption for women. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 202–217. doi: 10.1111/0038-4941.00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, N., & Grunow, D. (2018). Do economic resources play a role in bargaining child care in couples? Parental investment in cases of matching and mismatching gender ideologies in Germany. European Societies, 1–31. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1473626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nock, S. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53–76. doi: 10.1177/019251395016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). OECD family database. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(431).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1017/S0047279404008232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouwels, B. (2011). Work, family, and happiness: Essays on interdependence within families, life events, and time allocation decisions. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodman, H. (1967). Marital power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States: A cross-national discussion. Journal of Marriage and Family, 29(2), 320–324. doi: 10.2307/349693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 458–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppanner, L. (2010). Cross-national reports of housework: An investigation of the gender empowerment measure. Social Science Research, 39(6), 963–975. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2016). Change in Spousal Human Capital and Housework: A Longitudinal Analysis. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 864–880. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcw043
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53(3), 191–205. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynes, S. R. (1990). Educational heterogamy and marital satisfaction between spouses. Social Science Research, 19, 153–174. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(90)90019-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, M. (1998). Who dominates when? Assymetrical patterns of influence among Dutch husbands and wives. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• van Damme, M. (2010). Vrouwen die hun eigen boontjes doppen. Sociale klasse en het inkomen van Britse, gescheiden vrouwen. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 13(4), 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• van Damme, M., & Kalmijn, M. (2014). The dynamic relationships between union dissolution and women’s employment: A life-history analysis of 16 countries. Social Science Research, 48(0), 261–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Van den Troost, A., Vermulst, A. A., Gerris, J. R. M., Matthijs, K., & Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. (2006). Effects of spousal economic and cultural factors on Dutch marital satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 235–262. doi: 10.1007/s10834-006-9016-9
   Google Scholar
• van Putten, A. E. (2009). The role of intergenerational transfers in gendered labour patterns. Universiteit Utrecht, Amsterdam/Den Haag: Aksant/Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI rapport 79).
   Google Scholar
• Vannoy, D., & Cubbins, L. A. (2001). Relative socioeconomic status of spouses, gender attitudes, and attributes, and marital quality experienced by couples in metropolitan Moscow. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(2), 195–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whillans, A. V., Dunnb, E. W., Smeets, P., Bekkers, R., & Norton, M. I. (2017). Buying time promotes happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(32), 8523–8527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706541114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiik, K. A., Lappegård, T., & Keizer, R. (2010). Relationship quality in Europe (633). Norway: Statistics Norway, Research Department.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Tsang, S. K. M., Peilian, C., Yee Tak, C., Xiulan, Z., & Yip, P. S. F. (2012). Wives’ relative income and marital satisfaction among the urban Chinese population: Exploring some moderating effects. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(2), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar