Human beings as receivers, doers and judges. The anthropological foundations of sustainable public action in the capability approach

References

• Anderson, E. (2003). Sen, ethics, and democracy. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 239–261. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000077953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as a cultural fact. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2013). The origins of active social policy: Labour market and childcare policies in a comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M. (2008). Activation policies, new modes of governance and the issue of responsibility. Social Policy and Society, 7(3), 367–377. doi: 10.1017/S1474746408004338
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M. (2012). Individual working lives and collective action: An introduction to capability for work and capability for voice. Transfer, 18(1), 9–18. doi: 10.1177/1024258911431046
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M. (2013). La Participation à l’Aune de l’Approche par les Capacités d’Amartya Sen. In F. Claisse, C. Laviolette, M. Reuchamps, & C. Ruyters (Eds.), La Participation en Action (pp. 41–54). Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., Dif-Pradalier, M., & Rosenstein, E. (2013). Politiques d’activation des jeunes et modalités d’accompagnement. Le cas du Programme FORJAD en Suisse. Lien social et Politiques, 70, 13–27. doi: 10.7202/1021153ar
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., & Farvaque, N. (2006). Promoting capability for work: The role of local actors. In Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., & Sagovsky, N. (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures: The capability approach (pp. 121–142). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., & Farvaque, N. (2008). Amartya Sen, Une politique de la liberté. Paris : Michalon.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., & Laruffa, F. (2018). Deliberative democracy in the real world: The contribution of the capability approach. International Review of Sociology, 28(2), 216–233. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2018.1477101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., Laruffa, F., & Rosenstein, E. (2018). Towards a critical sociology of democracy: The potential of the capability approach. Critical Sociology, 44(6), 953–968. doi: 10.1177/0896920517701273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M., & Rosenstein, E. (2016). From inclusiveness to selectivity: Paradoxical outcomes of youth transition policies in Switzerland. Sociologia del Lavoro, 141, 39–54. doi: 10.3280/SL2016-141003
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, V. (2018). From knowledge to informational basis: Capability, capacity to aspire and research. Critical Sociology, 44(6), 899–920.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, D. A. (1992). Functioning and capability: The foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s development ethic. Political Theory, 20(4), 584–612. doi: 10.1177/0090591792020004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2003). Re-conceptualizing welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 441–459. doi: 10.1017/S0047279403007062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingeldey, I. (2007). Between workfare and enablement – the different paths to transformation of the welfare state: A comparative analysis of activating labour market policies. European Journal of Policy Research, 46(6), 823–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00712.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escande Varniol, M.-C., Laulom, S., Mazuyer, E. & Vielle, P. (Dir.). (2012). Quel droit social dans une Europe en crise? Bruxelles: Larcier.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gautié, J., & Gazier, B. (2003). Equipping markets for people: Transitional labour markets as the central part of a new social model. Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics Conference, Aix-en-Provence.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (2002). Transformation of the welfare state: The silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanola, B. (2009). Re-thinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 431–444. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0126-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (ed.). (2017). The uses of social investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hick, R. (2012). The capability approach: Insights for a new poverty focus. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 291–308. doi: 10.1017/S0047279411000845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (ed.). (2013). Work life balance. The agency and capability gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B., Fahlén, S., & Takács, J. (2011). Agency and capabilities to achieve a work–life balance: A comparison of Sweden and Hungary. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(2), 168–198. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxr007
   Google Scholar
• Laruffa, F. (2016). The capability approach as a critical yardstick for the employability paradigm. Sociologia del lavoro, 141, 23–37. doi: 10.3280/SL2016-141002
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Giullari, S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76–104. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000329342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orianne, J.-F., & Conter, B. (2007). Les politiques d’employabilité en Belgique : traitement clinique des chômeurs et traitement statistique du chômage. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, XXXVIII(2), 175–190. doi: 10.4000/rsa.476
   Google Scholar
• Orton, M. (2011). Flourishing lives: The capabilities approach as a framework for new thinking about employment, work and welfare in the 21st century. Work Employment Society, 25(2), 352–360. doi: 10.1177/0950017011403848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, H.-U., Egdell, V., Bonvin, J.-M., & Atzmüller, R. (Eds.). (2017). Empowering young people in disempowering times, fighting inequality through capability oriented policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2000). ‘Work first’: Workfare and the regulation of contingent labour markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 119–138. doi: 10.1093/cje/24.1.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114. doi: 10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics, 22(2), 257–269. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxv008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency, and freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living: Lecture I, Concepts and critiques. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living: The Tanner lectures, Clare Hall, Cambridge, 1985 (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1990). Welfare, freedom and social choice: A reply. Recherches économiques de Louvain, 56(3–4), 451–485.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238. doi: 10.5840/jphil2006103517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano Pascual, A., & Magnusson, L. (Eds.). (2008). Reshaping welfare states and activation regimes in Europe. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2004). The right not to work: Power and disability. Monthly Review, 55(10), 30–44. doi: 10.14452/MR-055-10-2004-03_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B., & Chung, H. (Eds.). (2017). After austerity: Welfare state transformation in Europe after the great recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., & De-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yavorsky, J., Kamp Dush, C., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar