Flexible time – but is the time owned? Family friendly and family unfriendly work arrangements, occupational gender composition and wages: a test of the mother-friendly job hypothesis in Sweden

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (1999). Multiple regression. A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Y., & Weeden, K. (2014). Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender wage gaps. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 457–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. (2019a). Women’s work penalty in access to flexible working arrangements across Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(1), 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. (2019b). National-level family policies and workers’ access to schedule control in a European comparative perspective: Crowding out or in, and for whom? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(1), 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & van der Horst, M. (2018). Flexible working and unpaid overtime in the UK: The role of gender, parental and occupational status. Social Indicators Research, 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & Van der Lippe, T. (2018). Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, D., Hermsen, J., & Vanneman, R. (2003). The effects of occupational gender segregation across race. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(1), 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. E., & Kalleberg, A. (2006). Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations, 33, 191–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw, J., & Halliday Hardie, J. (2012). Compensating differentials, labor market segmentation, and wage inequality. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1179–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitch, C., & Huffman, M. (2001). Family-responsive benefits and the two-tiered labor market. In R. Hertz & N. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home (pp. 103–130). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Den Dulk, L., Groenevelda, S., Ollier-Malaterreb, A., & Valcour, M. (2013). National context in work-life research: A multi-level cross-national analysis of the adoption of workplace work-life arrangements in Europe. European Management Journal, 31(5), 478–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three western European societies: England, France and Sweden. The British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filer, R. (1985). Male-female wage differences: The importance of compensating differentials. Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 38, 426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallie, D., et al. (2012). Teamwork, skill development and employee welfare. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50, 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work and Occupations, 31, 367–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., & Camarigg, V. (1992). Gender, parenthood and job-family compatibility. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies. Work and Occupations, 22(4), 380–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., & Noonan, M. (2016). Telecommuting and earnings trajectories among American women and men 1989–2008. Social Forces, 95(1), 217–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber, R. (2011). Gender, occupational composition, and flexible work scheduling. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 572–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber, R. (2012). Women’s work and working conditions: Are mothers compensated for lost wages? Work and Occupations, 39(2), 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, L. (2009). Flexible daily work schedules in U.S. jobs: Formal introductions needed. Industrial Relations, 48(1), 27–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grestel, N., & Clawson, D. (2014). Class advantage and the gender divide: Flexibility on the job and at home. American Journal of Sociology, 120(2), 395–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, A., & Öun, I. (2018). In search of family-friendly careers? Professional strategies, work conditions and gender differences in work-family conflict. Community, Work & Family, 21(1), 87–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Grzywacz, J., Allen, S., & Blanchard, V. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Steinberg, R. (1990). Compensating differentials and male-female wage gap: Evidence from the New York state comparable worth study. Social Forces, 69, 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G. I., & Stavrou, E. T. (2013). Non-standard work arrangements and national context. European Management Journal, 31(5), 464–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 487–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killingsworth, M. R., & Heckman, J. J. (1987). Female labor supply. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Chapter 2, 1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 103–204). North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2018). Workplace flexibility and parent–child interactions among working parents in the U.S. Social Indicators Research, 1–43. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 7, 127–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class and inequality trade-offs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics, 20, 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowska, A. (2018). Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with nonwork. Two countries with different models of division of labour. Social Indicators Research, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, L. A. (2018). Flexible men and successful women: The Effects of flexible working hours on German couples wages. Work, Employment and Society, 32, 687–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• le Grand, C. (1997). Kön, lön och yrke. In I. Persson & E. Wadensjö (Eds.), Kvinnors och mäns löner – varför så olika?. SOU:1997:136. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, Y. (2018). Does flexibility help employees switch off from work? Flexible working-time arrangements and cognitive work-to-home spillover for women and men in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2031-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott, Y., & Chung, H. (2016). Gender discrepancies in the outcomes of schedule control on overtime hours and income in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32, 752–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowen, A., & Sicilian, P. (2009). Family-friendly fringe benefits and the gender wage gap. Journal of Labor Research, 30(2), 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyness, K. S., Gornick, J., Stone, P., & Grotto, A. R. (2012). It’s all about control. Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 1023–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C. (2009). Gender, occupational prestige and wages: A test of devaluation theory. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C. (2010). Why is there a gender wage gap according to occupational prestige? An analysis of the gender wage gap by occupational prestige and family obligations in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 53(2), 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C., & Nermo, M. (2017). Gender, parenthood and wage differences – The importance of time-consuming job characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 131(2), 797–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, H. (2012). Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review, 28, 241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2005). Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Source of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review, 70, 949–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrate, E. (2005). Flexible hours, workplace authority, and compensating wage differentials in the US. Feminist Economics, 11(1), 11–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nsiah, C., DeBeaumont, R., & Ryerson, A. (2013). Motherhood and earnings: Wage variability by major occupational category and earnings level. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34, 224–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, P. (2009). Why do employers give discretion? Family versus performance concerns. Industrials Relations: A Journal of Economic and Society, 48(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Präg, P., & Mills, M. (2014). Family-related working schedule flexibility across Europe. In R. Europe (Ed.), Short statistical report No. 6. European Commission, Rand Europe. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR365.html.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, E., Lucchini, M., den Dulk, L., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2018). The skill profile of the employees and the provision of flexible working hours in the workplace: A multilevel analysis across European countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 49(2), 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. (2001). ‘Are you going home already?’ The long hours culture, women managers and patriarchal closure. Time Society, 10, 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieman, S., Schafer, M. H., & McIvor, M. (2013). The rewards of authority in the workplace: Do gender and age matter? Sociological Perspectives, 56(1), 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, H., & Häusermann, S. (2013). Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 248–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1979). Compensating wage differentials and public policy: A review. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32, 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2014). På tal om kvinnor och män. Lathund om jämställdhet 2014. Retrieved from http://efsvasterbotten.se/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/P%C3%A5-tal-om-kvinnor-och-m%C3%A4n.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home-based telework, gender and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2), 123–145.
   Google Scholar
• Swanberg, J., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Drescher-Burke, K. (2005). A question of justice: Disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. Journal of Family Issues, 2(6), 866–895.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W., & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, K. (2005). Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the United States. Social Science Research, 34, 454–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender. Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issue, 69(2), 209–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder, K. (2009). Flexible scheduling and the gender wage gap. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1), 1–27. Article 30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar