Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository

REFERENCES

• Aaker, D.A. and Day, G.S. (1990) Marketing Research (4th edn). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Aquilino, W.S. and LoSciuto. L.A. (1990) Effects of interview mode on self-reported drug use, Public Opinion Quarterly 54, 362-95.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, A. (1984) The Not-ln-My-Backyard Syndrome, Downsview, Ontario: York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aydiya, S.A. and McClendon, M.J. (1990) Response effects in mail surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 54, 229-47.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, G.W., Jr., Jenkins-Smith, H.C. and Silva, C. (1996) On-site storage of high level nuclear waste: attitudes and perceptions of local residents, Risk Analysis 16, 309-19.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R.D.. Moore, H.A. and Williams, J.A. (1993) In whose backyard? Concern about siting a nuclear waste facility, Sociological Inquiry 63, 30-48.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, M.L. and Bernstein, A.B. (1988) Interviewer characteristics and performance on a complex health survey, Social Sciences Research 17, 239-51.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, A. and Dahlstrand, U. (1995) Risk perception and the location for a repository of spent nuclear fuel, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 36, 25-36.
   Google Scholar
• Binney, S.E.. Mason, R., Martsoif, S.W. and Detweiler, J.H. (1996) Credibility, public trust, and the transport of radioactive waste through local communities, Environment and Behavior 28, 283-301.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G.F. (1990) Issue involvement and response effects in public opinion surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 54, 204-18.
   Google Scholar
• Brion, D. (1988) An essay on LULU. NIMBY, and the problem of distributive justice. Environmental Affairs 15, 437-503.
   Google Scholar
• Brion, D. J. (1991) Essential Industry and the NIMBY Phenomenon, New York: Quorum.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, B. and Marsh, C. (1992) The effect of questionnaire length on survey response, Quality & Quantity 26, 233-44.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, J. (1992) In the village square: risk misperception and decisionmaking in the regulation of low-level radioactive waste, Ecology Law Quartery 19, 481-545.
   Google Scholar
• Daggett, C. J. (1989) The role of risk communication in environmental gridlocked. in V. T. Covello, D. B. McCallum and M. T. Paviova (eds) Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of a Government and Nongovernment Organizations, pp. 31-36. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1991) The design and administration of mail surveys, Annual Review of Sociology 17, 225-49.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1996) Stämningar i Storuman efter Folkomröstningen om ett Djupförvar (Projekt Rapport No. PR D-96-004). Stockholm: SKB.
   Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1998) Stämningar i Malä efter Folkomröstningen 1997 (Projekt Rapport No. PR D-98-03). Stockholm: SKB.
   Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. and Sjöberg, L. (1990) Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident, Journal of Environment Psychology 10, 135-49.
   Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. Sjöberg, L. (1991) Attitudes and conceptions of adolescents with regard to nuclear power and radioactive wastes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21. 2007-35.
   Google Scholar
• Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. and Persson, L. (1993) Public reaction to radiation: fear, anxiety or phobia? Health Physics 64, 223-31.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T.C. and Cvetkovich, G.T. (1995) Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society, Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, D. (1992) Fair rules for siting a high-level nuclear waste respository, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11, 442-75.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, D. and Kunreuther, H. (1995) The Dilemma of Siting a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository, Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, M.-R. (1988) Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Expose, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B.. Slovic, P.. Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy Sciences 9, 127-52.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J.. Slovic, P. and Mertz, C.K. (1996) Final Report, City of Portland Earthquake Risk Survey (Report No.) Eugene, Oregon: Decision Research.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Kasperson, R., Kunreuther, H. and Slovic, P. (1992) Time to rethink nuclear waste storage, Issues in Science and Technology 8(4), 42-48.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Chalmers, J., Easterling, D.. Kasperson, R.. Kunreuther, H., Mertz, C.K.. Mushkatel, A., Pijawka. K.D., Slovic, P. and Dotto, L. (1995) One Hundred Centuries of Solitude. Redirecting America's High-level Nuclear Waste Policy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F.J. and Mangione, T.W. (1985) The Value of Interviewer Training and Supervision. Center for Survey Research, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, C. (1992) Blueprint for green marketing, American Demographics 14, 34-38.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L.J., Howard, C. Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R. (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risk? Risk Analysis 16, 473-86.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J.H. (1993) Risk perceptions associated with a high-level nuclear waste repository. Sociological Spectrum 13, 139-51.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S. (1996) The old lady visits your backyard: a tale of morals and markets, Journal of Political Economy 104, 1297-313.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, A.W. (1995) The role of The unconscious in the perception of risks, Risk: Health Safety & Environment 6, 15-40.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, M.B. (1994) Whose Backyard, Whose Risk: Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gervers, J.H. (1987) The NIMBY syndrome: is it inevitable? The Environment 29, 18-29.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goyder, J.C. (1985) Face-to-face interviews and mail questionnaires: the net difference in response rate, Public Opinion Quarterly 49, 234-52.
   Google Scholar
• Groothuis, P.A. and Miller, G. (1994) Locating hazardous waste facilities: the influence of NIMBY beliefs, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53, 335-46.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R.M. (1979) Actors and questions in telephone and personal interview surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 43, 190-205.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A. and Baumgartner, R. (1978) Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review 43, 447-62.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, D.W., Summers, C., Prystupa. M. and McKenzie-Richer, A. (1997) Public opposition to a proposed nuclear waste repository in Canada: an investigation of cultural and economic effects. Risk Analysis 17, 293-302.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. and Leyden, K.M. (1995) Beyond NIMBY: explaining opposition to hazardous waste facilities, Policy Studies Journal 23, 601-19.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K.L. and Wegge, D.G. (1991) The effects of interviewer gender upon response in telephone survey research, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6, 573-84.
   Google Scholar
• Inhaber, H. (1992) Yard sale. Society should bid for the right to site its prisons and dumps, The Sciences 32(1), 16-21.
   Google Scholar
• John, I.D. (1992) Statistics as rhetoric in psychology, Australian Psychologist. 27, 144-49.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. (1991) Individual style in an American public opinion survey: personal performance and the ideology of referentiality, Language in Society 20, 557-76.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R.E., Golding, D. and Tuler, S. (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks, Journal of Social Issues 48, 161-87.
   Google Scholar
• Kearny, R.C. and Smith, A.A. (1994) The low-level radioactive waste siting process in Connecticut anatomy of a failure, Policy Studies Journal 22, 617-30.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L.R. and Sarin, R.K. (1988) Equity in social risk: some empirical observations, Risk Analysis 8, 135-46.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.E. (1991) Risk perception and the politics of citizen participation: the case of radioactive waste management, in B. J. Garrick and W. C. Gekler (eds), The Analysis, Communication and Perception of Risk, pp. 105-17. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.E. and Clary, B.B. (1991) Citizen participation and the NIMBY syndrome: Republic response to radioactive waste disposal, The Western Political Quarterly 44, 299-327.
   Google Scholar
• Krannich, R.S. and Albrecht, S.L. (1995) Opportunity/threat responses to nuclear waste disposal facilities, Rural Sociology 60, 435-53.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn. R.G. (1998) Social and political issues in siting a nuclear fuel waste disposal facility. Ontario, Canada, Canadian Geographer 42, 14-28.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, R.G. and Ballard, K.R. (1998) Canadian innovations in siting hazardous waste management facilities, Environmental Management 22.,533-45.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., Easterling, D., Desvousges, W. Slovic P. (1990) Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada, Risk Analysis 10, 469-84.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R. and Elander, L. (1992) Reinterpreting locational conflicts NIMBY and nuclear waste management in Sweden, Policy and Politics 20, 249-64.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, DJ. (1993) Beyond self-interest: a model of public attitudes towards waste facility siting. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36, 345-63.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, D.J. (1995) Why protest? Public behavioral and attitudinal response to siting a waste disposal facility, Policy Studies Journal 23, 449-518.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, D.J. (1996) Why not here? The importance of context, process, and outcome on public attitudes toward siting of waste facilities, Society & Natural Resources 9, 375-94.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, D.J and Green, O.P. (1994) NIMBY or NIABY: a logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting, Journal of Environmental Management 40, 33-50.
   Google Scholar
• Luloff, A.E.. Albrecht, S.L. and Bourke, L. (1998) NIMBY and the hazardous and toxic waste siting dilemma: the need for concept clarification, Society & Natural Resources 11, 81-89.
   Google Scholar
• Marris,C., Langford, L.H. and O'Riordan, T. (1998) A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: comparison with the psychometric paradigm, Risk Analysis 18, 635-47.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, M.K. and Oakes, A.S. (1996) Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste, Risk Analysis 16, 421-27.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M.V. (1994) Collective bads - the case of low-level radioactive-waste compacts, Natural Resources Journal 34, 563-88.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1991) Psychology and methodology of response styles, in R. E. Snow and D. E. Wiley (eds), Improving Inquiry in Social Science. A Volume in Honor of Lee J. Cronbach. pp. 161-200. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.C. (1980) Polling on nuclear power: a critique of that polls after Three Mile Island. in A. H. Cantril (eds), Polling on the Issues, pp. 66-98. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, H. (1989) From cognition to action: the search for dominance in decision making. in H. Montgomery and O. Svenson (eds), Process and Structure in Human Decision Making. pp. 23-50. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nationelle samordnaren pÅ karnavfallsomrÅdet (1998) In O. Söderberg (eds), Kampanj med Kunskaper Och Känslor. Om Kärnavfallsomröstningen i MalÅ Kommun 1997, Stockholm: Miljödepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, M. (1986) Statistical inference: a Commentary for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peelle, E. and Ellis, R. (1987) Beyond the 'not-in-my-backyard impasse", Forum for Applied Research & Public Policy 2, 68-77.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E. and Slovic, P. (1996) The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 1427-53.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, I.P.H.. Vittes, M.E. and Lilie, S.A. (1992) Who says it's risky business? Public attitudes toward hazardous waste facility siting, Polity 24, 499-513.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, P.H.. Lilie, S.A. and Vittes, M.E. (1993) Hard issues core values and vertical constraint: the case of nuclear power, British Journal of Political Science 23, 29-50.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B.C. (1994) Beyond NIMBY: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B.C.. Gunderson, W.C. and Harbage, P.T. (1994) Alternatives to NIMBY grindlock -voluntary approaches to radioactive-waste facility siting in Canada and the United States, Canadian Public Administration 37, 644-66.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, K.A. (1989) The effect of question wording on public support for government spending, Public Opinion Quarterly 53, 388-94.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Kasperson, J., Kasperson, F. and Tuler, S. (1992) Cultural prototypes, signals, and qualitative risk characteristics: how do people judge the seriousness of risk? In Society for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P.J. (1997) Public Involvement in the Siting of Contentious Facilities: Lessons from the Radioactive Waste Repository Siting Programmes in Canada and the United States, with Special Reference to the Swedish Siting Process (SSI Rapport No. 97:11). Stockholm: Statens strÅlskyddsinstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Rissmiller, K. (1993) Equality of status, inequality of result: State power and high-level radioactive waste, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 23, 103-18.
   Google Scholar
• Schlegloff, E.A. (1990) Comment, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 248-51.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1981) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys, New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H. and Kalton, G. (1985) Survey methods, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 635-79. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Radioactive Waste Management (1993) Earning Public Trust and Confidence: Requisites for Managing Radioactive Wastes, Washington DC: US Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, A. (1991) Ethical dilemmas, and radioactive waste: a survey of the issues. Environmental Ethics 13, 327-43.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K.S. (1993) Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• SIFO (1992) En majoritet Accepterar Lagring av kürnavfall i den Egna Kommunen, Stockholm: SIFO.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1987) Risk and Society. Studies in Risk Taking and Risk Generation. Hemel Hempstead, UK: George Alien & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1991) Risk Perception by Experts and the Public. Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 4. Center for Risk Research.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1996a) A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception, Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68, 219-25.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1996b) Perceived competence and motivation in industry and government as factors in risk perception, The Bellingham International Conference on Social Trust in Risk Management: Department of Psychology. Bellingham. WA: Western University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1996c) Risk Perceptions by Politicians and the Public. Rhizikon: Risk Research Reports No. 23. Center for Risk Research.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1997a) Explaining risk perception: an empirical and quantitative evaluation of cultural theory, Risk Decision and Policy 2, 113-30.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1997b) Perceived risk and tampering with nature: an application of the Extended Psychometric Model to nuclear disaster risk. Vth European Congress of Psychology: Dublin. European Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1998a) World views, political attitudes and risk perception, Risk-Health, Safety and Environment 9, 137-52.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1998b) Worry and risk perception, Risk Analysis 18, 85-93.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1999a) Are received risk perception models alive and well? Risk Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (1999b) Perceived competence and motivation in industry and government as factors in risk perception, in G. Cvetkovich and R. E. Löfstedt (eds), Social Trust and the Management of Risk, pp. 89-99. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. (in press) Specifying factors in radiation risk perception, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Drottz, B.-M. (1987) Psychological reactions to cancer risks after the Chernobyl accident, Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy 4, 259-71.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Winroth, E. (1986) Risk, moral value of actions, and mood, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 27, 191-208.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. Drottz, B.-M. (1988) Attityder till Radioktivt Avfall (SKN Report No. 23), Stockholm: Statens kärnbränslenämnd.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Drottz-SjÅberg, B.-M. (1993a) Attitudes to Nuclear Waste. Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 125. Center for Risk Research.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Drottz-SjÅberg, B.-M. (1993b) Moral Value, Risk and Risk Tolerance, Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 11. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Torell, G. (1993) The development of risk acceptance and moral evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 34, 223-36.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L. and Drottz-SjÅbergÅ B.-M. (1994) Risk Perception of Nuclear Waste: Experts and the Public, Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 66. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• SjÅberg, L., Viklund, M. and Truedsson, J. (1998) Attitudes and Opposition in Siting a High Level Nuclear Waste Repositor, Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 32. Center for Risk Research.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Layman. M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J. and Gesell, G. (1991) Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impact of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada, Risk Analysis 11, 683-96.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K. and Mullican, L. (1992) Health Risk Perception in Canada, Decision Research.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, T. J.. Schwendig, W. L. and Kilpatrick, J. A. (1992) Duplicate responses to multiple survey mailings: a problem? Journal of Advertising Research 32(2), 26-33.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. (1990) International troubles in face-to-face interviews, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 232-41.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, C. and Hine, D. W. (1997) Nuclear waste goes on the road: risk perception and compensatory tradeoffs in single-industry communities, Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 29, 11-3.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K., Bradburn, N. and D'Andrade, R. (1989) Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25, 401-21.
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, E. J. and Smith, K. W. (1993) Survey responses. An Evaluation of Their Validity, San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. and Dake, K. (1990) Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Daedalus 119(4), 41-60.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (1994) Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBYtheory on facility siting, Urban Study 31, 851-66
   Google Scholar