Perceived health risks and perceptions of expert consensus in modern food society

REFERENCES

• Baron J., Hershey J. C. and Kunreuther, H. (2000) Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry, Risk Analysis 20(4), 413–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bioteknologinemnda (2000) Oppfølgingskonferansen om Genmodifisert mat 15. og 16. November 2000, Genialt nr.4/2000. Bioteknologinemnda.
   Google Scholar
• Bredahl, L. (2000) Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods – Results of a cross-national survey, MAPP Working Paper, no 69. April 2000. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• CIW (2000) Water in Beeld, Voortgangsrapportage over het waterbeheer in Nederland, Commissie Integraal Waterbeheer (Committee on Integral Watermanagement).
   Google Scholar
• Dosman. D. M., Adamowicz, W. L. and Hrudey, S. E. (2001) Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety- related risk perceptions, Risk Analysis 21(2), 307–17.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1997) The Europeans and Modern Biotechnology. Eurobarometer 46.1, Brussels: The European Commission. Directorate General XII. Science, Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J. and Shepherd, R. (1995) Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering: interrelationship with the perceived need for regulation of the technology, Agriculture and Human Values 11(1), 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Hedderly, D., Howard, C. and Shepherd, R. (1997a) ‘Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering, Agriculture and Human Values 14, 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C. and Shepherd, R. (1997b) Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit and ethics, Science, Technology & Human Values 22(1), Winter, 98–124.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C. and Shepherd, R. (1998) Understanding public attitudes to technology, Journal of Risk Research 1(3), 221–35.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G., Lähteenmäki, L., Nielsen, N. A:, Poulsen, J. B., Ueland, O. and Åstrøm, A. (2001) Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification – results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries, Food Quality and Preference 12(8), 527–42.
   Google Scholar
• Heggem, R. (1999) Genteknologien sitt janusansikt. Ei studie av folk sine haldningar til genteknologi, Rapport 7/99, Trondheim: Senter for bygdeforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X. and Ratick, S. (2000) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework, in P. Slovic The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 232–45. (Reprinted from ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: a conceptual framework’, Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X. and Ratick, S. (1988) Risk Analysis 8(2), 177–87.)
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., Jhaveri, N. and Kasperson, J. X. (2001) Stigma and the social amplification of risk: toward a framework of analysis, in J. Flynn, P. Slovic and H. Kunreuther (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma. Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C. and Fisher, A. (2000) Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk, Risk Analysis 20(2), 179–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R. (1996) In science we trust? On the relation between scientific knowledge, risk consciousness and public trust, Acta Sociologica 39(1), 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999) Risk, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, S. and Frewer, L. J. (2001) Investigating specific concerns about different food Hazards, Food Quality and Preference 12, 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2000) GMO-mat. Helsemessige konsekvenser ved bruk av genmodifiserte næringsmidler og næringsmiddelingredienser, NOU 2000:29, Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Statens trykning.
   Google Scholar
• NygÅrd, B. and AlmÅs, R. (1996) Consumer acceptance of genetically engineered foods – perceived and real risks, Paper no 6/96, Trondheim: Centre for Rural Research.
   Google Scholar
• NygÅrd, B. and Heggem, R. (1998) Forbrukarhaldningar til genteknologi. Rapport frÅ den norske delen av Eurobarometer 46.1 (1996), Rapport 11/98, Trondheim: Senter for bygdeforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P. (2001) Technological stigma: some perspectives from the study of contagion, in J. Flynn, P. Slovic and H. Kunreuther (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma. Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. (1994) Risk communication, in R.A. Eblen and W.R. Eblen (eds) Encyclopaedia of the Environment, Boston, MA: Houghton Mittlin, pp. 620–23. Downloaded from Internet 19. May 2001. http://www.psandman.com/articles/riskcomm.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, P. and Kraft, N. (eds) (1996) Fast Salmon and Technoburgers, Oslo: The National Committees for Research Ethics. Downloaded from Internet 28.May 2002. http://www.etikkom. no/NENT/fast.htm
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology, Risk Analysis 20(2), 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. and Cvetkovich, G. (2001) Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers, Risk Analysis 21(1), 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1998) The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management, Risk Decision and Policy 3(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1996) Kost och hälsa – riskuppfattningar och attityder. Resultat av en enkätundersökning, Rapport 1/96, Uppsala: Livsmedelsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2000) Factors in Risk Perception, Risk Analysis 20(1), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2001) Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust, Risk Analysis 21(1), 189–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., Oskarsson, A., Bruce, Å. and Darnerud, P. O. (1997) Riskuppfattning hos experter inom omrÅdet kost och hÅlsa, Rapport 24/97, Uppsala: Livsmedelsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (2000a) Introduction and overview, in P. Slovic The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. xxi–xxxvii.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (2000b) Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield, in P. Slovic The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 390–412.
   Google Scholar
• Soot Ryen, T. (1999) E-nummer i maten: for deg som vil vite hva du spiser, 3. reviderte utgave, Oslo: Ex Libris Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, P., Shepherd, R. and Frewer, L. J. (1994) Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: a UK study, Agriculture and Human Values 11(1), Winter, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Statens næringsmiddeltilsyn (SNT) (2000) Holder maten mål? Analyser og resultater 1998–2000, Oslo: Statens næringsmiddeltilsyn.
   Google Scholar
• Storstad, O. and Haukenes, A. (2000) Forbrukeroppfatninger om mat og risiko. Resultat fra en spØrreundersØkelse, Rapport 10/00, Trondheim: Senter for bygdeforskning.
   Google Scholar