Understanding expressed low concern and latent concern near a hazardous waste treatment facility

REFERENCES

• Alberta Health (1997) Report: Swan Hills Special Waste Treatment Centre Human Health Impact Assessment, Edmonton: Alberta Health Surveillance.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, T. and Struzik, E. (1997) Swan Hills’ PCB levels 9X normal: readings taken after blast, Edmonton Journal 26 July, A1 (cover).
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, M. and Gunter, V. (1992a) Defining disaster: local constructions for recovery in the aftermath of chemical contamination, Social Problems 39(4), 345–65.
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, M. and Gunter, V. (1992b) It’s hard to keep a good town down: local recovery efforts in the aftermath of toxic contamination, Industrial Crisis Quarterly 6, 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. and Eyles, J. (1997) Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22(4), 505–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, J. and Fleishman, J. (1993) Sources of public conern about nuclear waste disposal in Texas agricultural communities, in R. Dunlap, M. Kraft and E. Rosa (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, 115–35. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, R. (1990) Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, I., Kates, R. and Snead, R. (1969) The human ecology of coastal flood hazard in Megalopolis, Research Paper 115, Chicago: Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, I., Kates, R. and While, G. (1978) The Environment as Hazard, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics, in D. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–61. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Covello, V. T. (1995) Risk perception and communication, Canadian Journal of Public Health 86(2), 80–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. (1993) Living With Risk, New York: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. (1995) Race, class and environmental justice, Progress in Human Geography 19(1), 111–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dake, K. (1991) Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22, 61–82.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2000) Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (second edition), Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Desvousages, W., Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. and Rosa, E. (1993) Perceived risk and attitudes toward nuclear wastes: National and Nevada perspectives, in R. Dunlap, M. Kraft and E. Rosa (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, pp. 175–208. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) How can we know the risks we face?: why risk selection is a social process, Risk Analysis 2(2), 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., Kraft, M. and Rosa, E. (1993a) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., Rosa, E., Baxter, R. and Mitchell, R. (1993b) Attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository at Hanford, Washington, in R. Dunlap, M. Kraft and E. Rosa (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, pp. 136–72. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, D. (2001) Fear and loathing in Las Vegas: will a nuclear waste repository contaminate the imagery of nearby places?, in J. Flynn, P. Slovic and H. Kunreuther (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, 133–56.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, I., Kates, R. and Snead, R. (1969) The human ecology of coastal flood hazard in Megalopolis, Research Paper 115, Chicago: Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, M. (1988) Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure, Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S., Taylor, S. M., Walter, S., Stieb, D., Frank, J. and Eyles, J. (1993) Modelling psychosocial effects of exposure to solid waste facilities, Social Science and Medicine 37(6), 791–804.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C. and Slovic, P. (1992) Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: analysis of a structural model, Risk Analysis 12(3), 417–29.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (2001) Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A. and Frey, J. (2000) The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (second edition). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 645–72.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. (1992) Nothing recedes like success? Risk analysis and the organizational amplification of risk, Risk Issues in Health and Safety 1, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. and Jones, T. (1991) Does an unpopular facility cause stress? A test of the Supreme Court Hypothesis, Social Forces 69, 1143–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gardener, G. and Gould, L. (1989) Public perceptions of the risks and benefits of technology, Risk Analysis 9(2), 225–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gardener, G., Tiemann, A., Gould, C., DeLuca, D., Doob, L. W. and Stolwijk, J. A. (1982) Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability judgments, and self reported actions toward nuclear power, Journal of Social Psychology 116, 179–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. and Mendelsohn, R. (1993) Perceived risk, dread, and benefits, Risk Analysis 13(3), 259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., Slovic, P. and Flynn, J. (1996) Risk perceptions, stigma and health policy, Health and Place 2(4), 213–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzly Gazette (1999) BOVAR to receive foreign hazardous waste, Grizzly Gazette 14 December, A1 (cover).
   Google Scholar
• Hryciuk, D. (1997) Swan Hills contamination widespread, says biologist, Edmonton Journal 26 August, A1 (cover).
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1982) Victims of Groupthink, second edition, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. and Dunlap, R. (1992) The social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time?, Rural Sociology 54, 28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. (1992) The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, Westport Ct: Praeger, 153–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. and Kasperson, J. (1991) Hidden hazards, in D. Mayo and R. Hollander (eds) Acceptable Evidence, pp. 9–28. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. and Kasperson, J. (1996) The social amplification and attenuation of risk, Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science 545, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. and Ratick, S. (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework, Risk Analysis 8(2), 177–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft and Clary (1993) Public testimony in nuclear waste repository herarings: A content analysis, in R. Dunlap, M. Kraft and E. Rosa (1993a) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, pp. 89–114. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krannich, R., Little, R. and Cramer, L. (1993) Rural community residents’ views of nuclear waste repository siting in Nevada, in R. Dunlap, M. Kraft and E. Rosa (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, pp. 263–90, Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (1992) Social Theories of Risk, Westport Con: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. (1996) Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice, Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Sciences 545, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Macey, S. (2001) Living in the shadow of nuclear energy in the United States, paper presented at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting, New York, 2 March.
   Google Scholar
• Madisso, U. (1985) A Synthesis of Social and Psychological Effects of Exposure to Hazardous Substances, Burlington ON Canada: Water Planning and Managament Branch, Inland Water Planning and Management Branch, Inland Water Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniels, T., Kamlet, M. and Fischer, G. (1992) Risk perception and the value of safety, Risk Analysis 12(4), 495–503.
   Google Scholar
• McQuaid-Cook, J. and Simpson, K. (1986) Siting a fully integrated waste management facility in Alberta, Hazardous Waste Management 36(9), 1031–36.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. (1994) Environmental hazards and the attenuation of risk, Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Applied Psychology, 17–22 July, 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. and Leiss, W. (1997) Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk Communication, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. (1992) Cultural theory and risk analysis, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, London: Praeger, 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1989) Risk analysis: a need to communicate, Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy Summer, 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1992) The social arena concept of risk debates, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk. Westport Ct: Praeger, 179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (1999) Using NVivo in Qualitative Research, London & Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, San Francisco: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, I. (1993) Demographic influences on risk perceptions, Risk Analysis 13(4), 413–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeneich, P. and Busset-Henchoz, M. (1998) La dissonance cognitive: facteur explicatif de l’accoutumance au risque, Revue de Géographie Alpine 2, 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shippee, G., Burroughs, J. and Wakefield, S. (1980) Dissonance theory revisited: perception of environmental hazards in residential areas, Environment and Behavior 12(1), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of Risk, Science 236, 280–5.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1982) Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis 2(2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Flynn, J. and Gregory, R. (1994) Stigma happens: social problems in the siting of nuclear facilities, Risk Analysis 14(5), 773–7.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K. and Mullican, L. (1993) Health-Risk Perception in Canada (No. 93-EHD-170), Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada (1996) Census of Population 1996, Ottawa: Supply and Services. Zonabend, F. (1993) The Nuclear Peninsula, London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar