Statistical methods for modeling the risk of runway excursions

References

• ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2009. Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems. ACRP Report 29. Washington, DC: ACRP, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2011. Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Safety Areas. ACRP Report 50. Washington, DC: ACRP, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2008. Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. ACRP Report 3. Washington, DC: ACRP, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, J. H., and S. Chib. 1993. “Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (422): 669–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviation Crashes Record Office. Death Rate Per Year. Accessed April 1, 2012. http://www.baaa-acro.com/Liste%20des%20deces%20par%20annee.htm
   Google Scholar
• Casella, G., and E. I. George. 1992. “Explaining the Gibbs Sampler.” The American Statistician 46 (3): 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox Jr, L. A. 2008. “What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices?” Risk Analysis 28 (2): 497–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. A., Jr. 2009. “Limitations of Risk Assessment Using Risk Matrices.” In Risk Analysis of Complex and Uncertain Systems, edited by L. A. Cox, Jr, 101–124. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dillingham, G. 2008. Aviation Safety: Progress on Reducing Runway Incursions Impeded by Leadership, Technology, and Other Challenges. GAO-08-481T. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” The Annals of Statistics 7 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, B., and T. Hothorn. 2011. An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis with R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2011. Federal Aviation Administration Safety Report 2010. Washington, DC: FAA, United States Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2012. Aeronautical Information Manual. Washington, DC: FAA, United States Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2004. Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System Manual v1.1.Washington, DC: FAA, United States Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraty, F. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Functional Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization). 2007. Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions. 1st ed. Canada: Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• IATA (International Air Transportation Association). 2011. Runway Excursion Risk Reduction Toolkit. 2nd ed. Accessed September 8. http://www.iata.org/iata/rerr-toolkit/rerr-toolkit.zip
   Google Scholar
• IATA (International Air Transportation Association). 2012. Global Accident Rate Reaches New Low - Regional Challenges Remain. Accessed April 1. http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/pages/2012-03-06-01.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. P. 1996. “Indicator and Stratification Methods for Missing Explanatory Variables in Multiple Linear Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (433): 222–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Z.-Q. 2011. “Fuzzy-ANP Based Research on the Risk Assessment of Runway Excursion.” The Tenth International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications (ISORA 2011), Dunhuang, China, August 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., and H. Yang. 2012. “Evaluation of the Risk Frequency for Hazards of Runway Incursion in Korea.” Journal of Air Transport Management 23 (1): 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., and L. Zeng. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis 9 (2): 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• Korb, K. B. 2010. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., D. Spiegelhalter, A. Thomas, and N. Best. 2009. “The BUGS Project: Evolution, Critique, and Future Directions (with Discussion).” Statistics in Medicine 28 (25): 3049–3082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, D. J., A. Thomas, and D. Spiegelhalter. 2000. “WinBUGS: A Bayesian Modeling Framework: Concepts, Structure and Extensibility.” Statistics and Computing 10 (4): 325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalouf, M., and T. B. Trafalis. 2011. “Robust Weighted Kernel Logistic Regression in Imbalanced and Rare Events Data.” Journal of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 55 (1): 168–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, D., and I. Monro. 2004. “Runway Incursions and Prevention Systems.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 76 (5): 472–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2013. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2007. Runway Overrun and Collision Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 Boeing 737-7H4, N471WN Chicago Midway International Airport Chicago, Illinois December 8, 2005. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-07/05. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2010. Runway Side Excursion During Attempted Takeoff in Strong and Gusty Crosswind Conditions Continental Airlines Flight 1404 Boeing 737-500, N18611 Denver, Colorado December 20, 2008. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-07/06. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• PMI (Project Management Institute). 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. 4th ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ntzoufras, I. 2009. Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, E. C., J. H. Lambert, and A. F. Johns. 2012. “Runway Safety Program Evaluation with Uncertainties of Benefits and Costs.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (5): 523–539.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, E. C., and J. H. Lambert. 2012. “Prioritizing Risk via Several Expert Perspectives with Application to Airport Runway Safety.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 103 (1): 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropeik, D. NOVA | How Risky is Flying? Accessed April 1. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/space/how-risky-is-flying.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schonefeld, J., and D. P. F. Moller. 2012. “Runway Incursion Prevention Systems: A Review of Runway Incursion Avoidance and Alerting System Approaches.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 51 (1): 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suess, E. A., and B. E. Trumbo. 2010. Introduction to Probability Simulation and Gibbs Sampling with R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, R. M. A., F. M. Comendador, L. M. Gordún, and F. J. S. Nieto. 2011. “The Development of Probabilistic Models to Estimate Accident Risk (Due to Runway Overrun and Landing Undershoot) Applicable to the Design and Construction of Runway Safety Areas.” Safety Science 49 (5): 633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidakovic, B. 2011. Statistics for Bioengineering Sciences with MATLAB and WinBUGS Support. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., and Y. Y. Haimes. 2010. “Cross-Classified Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Risk-Based Analysis of Complex Systems under Sparse Data.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95 (7): 764–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S., and J. Vlek. 2009. “An Analysis of the Causes of Airfield Incursions Attributed to Ground Vehicles.” Journal of Airport Management 3 (3): 299–308.
   Google Scholar