Dynamics of legal regime on safety of nuclear power plants in India after Fukushima disaster

References

• “About Atomic Energy Regulatory Board”, of DAE. Accessed www.aerb.gov.in
   Google Scholar
• Acton, J. M., and M. Hibbs. 2012. “Why Fukushima was Preventable.” Carnegie Paper. Accessed www.carnegieendowmwnt.org/2012/03/06/why-fukushima-was-preventable/a0i7
   Google Scholar
• Aiyar, S. S. A. July 3, 2005. “Nuclear Power for Energy Security.” The Times of India.
   Google Scholar
• “Apex Court Favors Independent Safety Regulator for N-plants.” The Indian Express, November 22, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Atomic Energy Act, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Bidwai, P. September 17, 2012. “The March of Nuclear Folly.” The Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Bilham, R., and V. K. Gaur. November 25, 2011). “Historical and Future Seismicity near Jaitapur, India.” Current Science 101: 1275–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. 2011. “Mostly Getting Nuclear Safety at the IAEA – but Missing Nuclear Security.” Accessed http://www.belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu
   Google Scholar
• Central Areca Nut & Cocoa Mktg. & Processing Coop. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka Supreme Court Cases 8. 1997. 31
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, C. May 1, 2012. “Disclose Kudankulum Nuclear Reports, CIC tells Government.” The Hindustan Times.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Regulation of Nuclear and Radiation Facilities. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Common Cause v. Union of India ( Writ Petition No. 464 of 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Consenting Process for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities and Related Industrial Facilities other then Nuclear Power Plants and Research Reactors. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Consenting Process for Nuclear Power Plants and Research Reactors. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Consenting Process for Radiation Facilities. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage. 1963. International Legal Materials 2: 727; Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident. 1986. International Legal Materials 25: 1370; Convention on Assistance in the case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency. 1986. International Legal Materials, 25, 1377; Art. 56, Protocol I and Art. 15, Protocol II Additional to Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. 1977. International Legal Materials 16: 1391.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on Nuclear Safety. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• DalpatAbasahebSolunke v. Dr. B. S. Mahajan Supreme Court Cases 1 1990, 305.
   Google Scholar
• Dental Council of India v. Subharti K. K. B. Charitable Trust Supreme Court Cases 5 2001, 486.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. September 27, 2012. “Desirability of Nuclear Power is the Real Question.” The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• ElBaradei, E. 1995. “International Law and Nuclear Energy: Overview of the Legal Framework.” Accessed www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/.../37302081625.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima Accident 2011, World Nuclear Association updated on 2013, January 10.
   Google Scholar
• “Fukushima Reactor Meltdown was a Man Made Disaster.” The Guardian, July 5, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• “Fukushima Report: Key Points in Nuclear Disaster Report.” BBC News Asia, July 5, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan, S. 2012. “India’s Nuclear Energy Architecture: Global Actions and Local Responses.” International Journal of Nuclear Law 3: 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Ghate, T. P.2011. “Fukushima to Jaitapur: Battling Fear of Unknown.” Radiation Protection and Environment 34: 159–163.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, A. 1999. “Issues of Nuclear Safety.” Frontline 16: 82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, A. 2000. “Undermining Nuclear Safety.” Frontline 17: 102.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. 2010). National Report to the Convention on Nuclear Safety, p. 54.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, Md. November 11, 2012. “IAEA Team Raised Serious Safety Issues at Rawatbhata, says Experts.” The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowitsch, O. 1994. “The Convention on Nuclear Safety.” Nuclear Law Bulletin 54: 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• “Japan Panel: Japan Nuclear Disaster ‘Man Made.” BBC News Asia, July 5, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• “Japan Quake: Explosion at Nuke Plant, Disaster Toll Rises to 1,300.” Indian Express, March 12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaraman, K. S. November 23, 2011. “Jaitapur Nuclear Plant Site not Immune to Quake: Experts.” DNA Daily.
   Google Scholar
• Kakodkar, A. 2012. “Japanese Nuclear Reactor Accident: Implications and Lessons for India’s Nuclear Energy Programme.” In Nuclear Power in the wake of Fukushima, edited by M. Sethi, 1–9. Delhi: KW.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminga, Menno T. 1995. “The IAEA Convention on Nuclear Safety.” International Comparative L aw Quarterly 44: 872.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and M. V. Ramana. 2008. “Compromising Safety: Design Choices and Severe Accident Possibilities in India’s Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor.” Science and Global Security 16: 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kushida, K. E. 2012. “Japan’s Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Narrative, Analysis, and Recommendations.” Shorenstein APARC Working Paper Series, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Lipscy, P. November 1, 2012. “Protecting Nuclear Plants From Nature’s Worst.” Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• “Location of Reactors”, Un starred Question No. 1691 ( LokSabha) August 22, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mannully, Y. T. 2010. “Law Relating to Nuclear Liability and Compensation in India.” International Journal of Nuclear Law 3: 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, Sitakant. 2011. “Contours of Nuclear Safety.” Air Power Journal 6: 79–114.
   Google Scholar
• “NPCIL declines to release nuke safety report.” Legal India, May 26, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited v. S. P. Udaykumar. W.P. © 3353/2013 Del HC; CM No. 6380/2013
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, N.June 20–24, 2011. “Does the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Require a Revision of the International Legal Regime on Nuclear Safety?” Presentation at the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India. 2004, 2 SCC 476.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunath, P. 2010. Jaitapur Nuclear Plant in Seismic Zone. Tata Institute of Social Science (TISS) Report.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. November 1, 2011. “How Homi Bhabha’s Vision Turned India into a Nuclear R & D leader?” The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Ram Mohan, M. P., K. D. Raju, and M. V. Shiju2013. “A Nuclear Liability Framework for South Asia: Formation of South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Nuclear Risk Community.” International Journal Nuclear Law 4: 46–62, 53.
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V. “India: Flunking Atomic Audits – CAG Reports and Nuclear Power.” Accessed cndpindia.org/india-flunking-atomic-audits-cag-reports-and-nuclear-power/
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V., and Ashwin Kumar. 2010. “Safety First? Kaiga and Other Nuclear Stories.” Economic and Political Weekly 45: 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, Joseph V. 1996. “Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety since Three Mile Island. Chicago: Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the INSAG on the Proposed Nuclear Safety Convention. July 9, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• “221st Report on the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill, 2011”, presented to the Hon’ble Chairman, RajyaSabha [ Upper House of the India’s Parliament] March 6, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary and Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall v. Howrah GanatantrikNagrikSamity Supreme Court Cases 3 2010, 732.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, M. 2012. “Preface.” In Nuclear Power in the Wake of Fukushima, edited by M. Sethi. Delhi: KW; “In Graphics, Fukushima Nuclear Alert.” BBC News Asia, July 9, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D. 1996. “Confronting the Nuclear Power Structure in India.” In Confronting the Experts, edited by B. Martin, 155–174. New York: University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subalusky, W. T., Jr. 1994. “The Value of Peer Reviews to Nuclear Plant Safety.” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 70: 701–702.
   Google Scholar
• Sundarrajan G. v. Union of India( Civil Appeal No. 4440 of 2013) SC
   Google Scholar
• Sunderrajan G. v. Union of India2012) 6 Madras Law Journal 529
   Google Scholar
• Sunderrajan, P. November 14, 2012. “IAEA Team finds defects at Rawatbhata Atomic Power Station.” The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderrajan, A. R., K. S. Parthasarthy, and S. Sinha. 2008). “25 Years of Safety Regulation.” AERB Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court Cases 2 2004, 476.
   Google Scholar
• State of Bihar v. Dr. Asis Kumar Mukherjee Supreme Court Cases 3 1975, 602.
   Google Scholar
• The Right to Information Act 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Udaykumar S. P.(Dr.) v. S. K. Srivastava 2012, CIC 6963.
   Google Scholar
• University of Mysore v. C. D.Govinda Rao, AIR 1965 SC 491.
   Google Scholar
• “Rewriting the Nuclear Safety Rulebook.” Accessed www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS-Rewriting-the-nuclear-safety-rulebook-1712121.html
   Google Scholar
• “SC to Examine Legality of Controversial Law on Nuclear Safety.” Accessed March 17, 2012 www.timesnow.tv
   Google Scholar
• “Supreme Court Bench Reserves Order on Kudunkulum Nuclear Plant.” Daily News and Analysis (DNA), December 6, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• “Press Release: National Committee in Solidarity with Jaitapur Struggle”, Delhi. August 26, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamura, E. 2011. “Effect of Transparency on Changing Views regarding Nuclear Energy before and after Fukushima Accident.” MPRA Paper No. 34346. Accessed October 27, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/34346
   Google Scholar