Ecological risk assessment of pesticides in the EU: what factors and groups influence policy changes?

References

• Boyd, James, and Spencer Banzhaf. 2007. “What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units.” Ecological Economics 63: 616–626. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Stephen R., Harold A. Mooney, John Agard, Doris Capistrano, Ruth S. DeFries, Sandra Diaz, Thomas Dietz, Anantha K. Duraiappah, Alfred Oteng-Yeboah, and Henrique Miguel Pereira. 2009. “Science for Managing Ecosystem Services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (5): 1305–1312.10.1073/pnas.0808772106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, Rudolf S., Rob Alkemade, Leon Braat, Lars Hein, and Louise Willemen. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7 (3): 260–272.10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and K. D. Van Liere. 1978. “New Environmental Paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education 9 (4): 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2009. “Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals.” EFSA Journal 7 (12): 1438–1796.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2010a. “Guidance for Evaluating Laboratory and Field Dissipation Studies to Obtain DegT50 Values of Plant Protection Products in Soil.” EFSA Journal 8 (12): 1936–2003.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2010b. “Scientific Opinion on the Development of Specific Protection Goal Options for Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides, in Particular in Relation to the Revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002).” EFSA Journal 8 (10): 1821–1875.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Chris, and Rodolphe Schlaepfer. 2001. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Application to the Policy Process for the Development of Forest Certification in Sweden.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (4): 642–661. doi:10.1080/13501760110064438.10.1080/13501760110064438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the Placing of Plant Protection Products on the Market and Repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Edited by L: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Special Eurobarometer 354: Food-related Risks. Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social, European Food Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2008. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, Valery E., and Peter Calow. 2013. “Use of the Ecosystem Services Concept in Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9: 269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1961. “Snowball Sampling.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32: 148–170.10.1214/aoms/1177705148
   Google Scholar
• Hunka, Agnieszka D., Mattia Meli, Amalie Thit, Annemette Palmqvist, Pernille Thorbek, and Valery E. Forbes. 2013. “Stakeholders’ Perspective on Ecological Modeling in Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides: Challenges and Opportunities.” Risk Analysis 33 (1): 68–79. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01835.x.10.1111/risk.2013.33.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunka, A. D., Annemette Palmqvist, P. Thorbek, and V. E. Forbes. 2013. “Risk Communication Discourse among Ecological Risk Assessment Professionals and Its Implications for Communication with Nonexperts.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9 (4): 616–622. doi:10.1002/ieam.1426.10.1002/ieam.v9.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. 1996. “The Key Informant Technique.” Family Practice 13 (1): 92–97. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.1.92.10.1093/fampra/13.1.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2–3): 129–168.10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A. 1998. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1): 98–130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051.10.1080/13501768880000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D., J. E. M. Baillie, W. J. Sutherland, P. R. Armsworth, N. Ash, J. Beddington, T. M. Blackburn, B. Collen, B. Gardiner, and K. J. Gaston. 2009. “Biodiversity Conservation and the Millennium Development Goals.” Science 325 (5947): 1502–1503.10.1126/science.1175035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. K., and G. C. Daily. 2008. “The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6.10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M. 2007. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (1): 95–117. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar