Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: extending the psychometric model

References

• Alhakami, A. S., and P. Slovic. 1994. “A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit.” Risk Analysis 14 (6): 1085–1096. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates. 2008. “Mixed-effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobko, P., P. L. Roth, and M. A. Buster. 2007. “The Usefulness of Unit Weights in Creating Composite Scores: A Literature Review, Application to Content Validity, and Meta-analysis.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (4): 689–709. doi:10.1177/1094428106294734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, G. 2003. “Emotional Reactions to Environmental Risks: Consequentialist versus Ethical Evaluation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00114-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and W. Brun. 2008. “Intuition and Affect in Risk Perception and Decision Making.” Judgment and Decision Making 3 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and H.-R. Pfister. 2000. “Action Tendencies and Characteristics of Environmental Risks.” Acta Psychologica 104 (3): 317–337. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00035-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and H.-R. Pfister. 2001. “Mental Representation of Global Environmental Risks.” Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 9 ( Special Issue: Environmental risks: Perception, Evaluation, and Management): 1–30.10.1016/S0196-1152(01)80022-3
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and H.-R. Pfister. 2005. “Consequences, Morality, and Time in Environmental Risk Evaluation.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (6): 461–479. doi:10.1080/13669870500064143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, G., and C. Tanner. 2012. “Risk Perception.” In Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, edited by Linda Steg, E. Agnes van den Berg, and J. I. M. de Groot, 15–26. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, A. 1998. “Comparative Studies of Risk Perception: A Review of Twenty Years of Research.” Journal of Risk Research 1 (2): 135–163. doi:10.1080/136698798377231.
   Google Scholar
• Borgida, E., and R. E. Nisbett. 1977. “The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7 (3): 258–271. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb00750.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., R. E. O’Connor, G. Böhm, D. Hanss, O. Bodi, F. Ekström, P. Halder, et al. 2012. “Causal Thinking and Support for Climate Change Policies: International Survey Findings.” Global Environmental Change 22 (1): 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., L. A. Cifuentes, M. L. deKay, and H. H. Willis. 2007. “Accounting for Variation in the Explanatory Power of the Psychometric Paradigm: The Effects of Aggregation and Focus.” Journal of Risk Research 10 (4): 527–554. doi:10.1080/13669870701315872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, W. J., E. Peters, and P. Slovic. 2012. “Risk Perception and the Economic Crisis: A Longitudinal Study of the Trajectory of Perceived Risk.” Risk Analysis 32 (4): 659–677. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01733.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. 2001. “The Science of Persuasion.” Scientific American 284 (2): 76–81.10.1038/scientificamerican0201-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, E., and M. Zeelenberg. 2003. “The Discounting of Ambiguous Information in Economic Decision Making.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16 (5): 341–352. doi:10.1002/bdm.450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, D., E. Maibach, X. Zhao, C. Roser-Renouf, and A. Leiserowitz. 2011. “Support for Climate Policy and Societal Action Are Linked to Perceptions about Scientific Agreement.” Nature Climate Change 1: 462–466. doi:10.1038/nclimate1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, R. V., and A. Doyle, eds. 2003. Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., and R. Willer. 2013. “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes.” Psychological Science 24 (1): 56–62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. “How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences 9 (2): 127–152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y., S. Ellis, A. Pazy, and T. Ricci-Siag. 2008. “On the Perception and Operationalization of Risk Perception.” Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4): 317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. T., and L. C. Gould. 1989. “Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology.” Risk Analysis 9 (2): 225–242. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goszczynska, M., M. Tyszka, and P. Slovic. 1991. “Risk Perception in Poland: A Comparison with Three Other Countries.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 4 (3): 179–193. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960040305.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. 2013. Moral Tribes. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., and R. Mendelsohn. 1993. “Perceived Risk, Dread, and Benefits.” Risk Analysis 13 (3): 259–264. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01077.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, J. I. M., and L. Steg. 2010. “Morality and Nuclear Energy: Perceptions of Risks and Benefits, Personal Norms, and Willingness to Take Action Related to Nuclear Energy.” Risk Analysis 30 (9): 1363–1373. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01419.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guber, D. L. 2013. “A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global Warming.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1): 93–115. doi:10.1177/000276421246336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. 2003. “Emotional Feedback and Amplification in Social Interaction.” The Sociological Quarterly 44 (4): 705–726. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanselmann, M., and C. Tanner. 2008. “Taboos and Conflicts in Decision Making: Sacred Values, Decision Difficulty, and Emotions.” Judgment and Decision Making 3 (1): 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermand, D., E. Mullet, and L. Rompteaux. 1999. “Societal Risk Perception among Children, Adolescents, Adults, and Elderly People.” Journal of Adult Development 6 (2): 137–143. doi:10.1023/A:1021676909857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinman, G. W., E. A. Rosa, R. R. Kleinhesselink, and T. C. Lowinger. 1993. “Perceptions of Nuclear and Other Risks in Japan and the United States.” Risk Analysis 13 (4): 449–455. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00745.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L. L. Ouellette, D. Braman, and G. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, P. M., S. Zahran, and A. Vedlitz. 2008. “Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States.” Risk Analysis 28 (1): 113–126. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kpanake, L., B. Chauvin, and E. Mullet. 2008. “Societal Risk Perception among African Villagers without Access to the Media.” Risk Analysis 28 (1): 193–202. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01008.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N. N., and P. Slovic. 1988. “Taxonomic Analysis of Perceived Risk: Modeling Individual and Group Perceptions within Homogeneous Hazard Domains.” Risk Analysis 8 (3): 435–455. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb00508.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, and J. Neter. 2004. Applied Linear Regression Models. 5th ed. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lazo, J. K., J. C. Kinnell, and A. Fisher. 2000. “Expert and Layperson Perceptions of Ecosystem Risk.” Risk Analysis 20 (2): 179–194. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. 2004. “The Multiple Source Effect and Synthesized Speech.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 182–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00730.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., G. E. Gignac, and S. Vaughan. 2013. “The Pivotal Role of Perceived Scientific Consensus in Acceptance of Science.” Nature Climate Change 3: 399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A. 1988. “A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (404): 1198–1202. doi:10.2307/2290157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macri, D., and E. Mullet. 2007. “Cross-national Validation of an Eight-factor Model of Societal Risk Perception.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 13 (6): 1352–1358. doi:10.1080/10807030701655848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniels, T., L. J. Axelrod, N. S. Cavanagh, and P. Slovic. 1997. “Perception of Ecological Risk to Water Environments.” Risk Analysis 17 (3): 341–352. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00872.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniels, T., L. J. Axelrod, and P. Slovic. 1995. “Characterizing Perception of Ecological Risk.” Risk Analysis 15 (5): 575–588. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00754.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin, B., and D. M. Oppenheimer. 2005. “Correlated Averages vs. Averaged Correlations: Demonstrating the Warm Glow Heuristic beyond Aggregation.” Social Cognition 23 (3): 257–278. doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., and R. K. Goidel. 2007. “Understanding Citizen Perceptions of Science Controversy: Bridging the Ethnographic Survey Research Divide.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (4): 421–440. doi:10.1177/0963662506065558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., and L. Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. “The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks.” Nature Climate Change 1 (1): 35–41. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portell, M., R. M. Gil, J. M. Losilla, and J. Vives. 2014. “Characterizing Occupational Risk Perception: The Case of Biological, Ergonomic and Organizational Hazards in Spanish Healthcare Workers.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 17 (51): 1–12. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich, A., and T. A. Morton. 2012. “Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs about Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 32 (6): 992–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeser, S. 2010. “Intuitions, Emotions and Gut Reactions in Decisions about Risks: Towards a Different Interpretation of ‘Neuroethics’.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/13669870903126275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe-Redding, J., E. W. Maibach, L. Feldman, and A. Leiserowitz. 2011. Republicans and Climate Change: An Audience Analysis of Predictors for Belief and Policy Preferences ( Working Paper). Yale University. Accessed February 5, 2015. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2026002
   Google Scholar
• von Roten, F. C. 2006. “Do We Need a Public Understanding of Statistics?” Public Understanding of Science 15 (2): 243–249. doi:10.1177/0963662506061883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., L. Lowery, S. Imada, and J. Haidt. 1999. “The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A Mapping between Three Moral Emotions (Contempt, Anger, Disgust) and Three Moral Codes (Community, Autonomy, Divinity).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (4): 574–586. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savadori, L., S. Savio, E. Nicotra, R. Rumiati, M. Finucane, and P. Slovic. 2004. “Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology.” Risk Analysis 24 (5): 1289–1299. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00526.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, S., and J. Singer. 1962. “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State.” Psychological Review 69 (5): 379–399. doi:10.1037/h0046234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenk, C. E., and A. E. Fruzzetti. 2011. “The Impact of Validating and Invalidating Responses on Emotional Reactivity.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 30 (2): 163–183. doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.2.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R. A., N. C. Much, M. Mahapatra, and L. Park. 1997. “The ‘Big Three’ of Morality (Autonomy, Community, Divinity) and the ‘Big Three’ Explanation of Suffering.” In Morality and Health, edited by A. Brandt and P. Rozin, 119–169. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., C. Keller, and H. A. L. Kiers. 2005. “A New Look at the Psychometric Paradigm of Perception of Hazards.” Risk Analysis 25 (1): 211–222. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00580.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., C. Keller, and H. A. L. Kiers. 2006. “Lay People's Perception of Food Hazards: Comparing Aggregated Data and Individual Data.” Appetite 47 (3): 324–332. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 2000. “Factors in Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 20 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 2006. “As Time Goes by: The Beginnings of Social and Behavioural Science Risk Research.” Journal of Risk Research 9 (6): 601–604. doi:10.1080/13669870600799911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., and E. Winroth. 1986. “Risk, Moral Value of Actions, and Mood.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 27 (1): 191–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1986.tb01197.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236 (4799): 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., ed. 2000a. The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 2000b. “Perception of Risk.” In The Perception of Risk, edited by Paul Slovic, 220–231. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1985. “Characterizing Perceived Risk.” In Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, edited by Robert W. Kates, Christoph Hohenemser, and Jeanne X. Kasperson, 91–125. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., and M. A. Hogg. 2008. “Social Identity and Attitudes.” In Attitudes and Attitude Change, edited by W. D. Crano and R. Prislin, 337–360. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stallen, P. J. M., R. Geerts, and H. K. Vrijling. 1996. “Three Conceptions of Quantified Societal Risk.” Risk Analysis 16 (5): 635–644. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00813.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra, T., J. M. Gutteling, G. D. Geldof, and L. J. Kappe. 2006. “The Perception of Flood Risk and Water Nuisance.” Water Science & Technology 54 (6): 431–439. doi:10.2166/wst.2006.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utts, J. 2003. “What Educated Citizens Should Know about Statistics and Probability.” The American Statistician 57 (2): 74–79. doi:10.1198/0003130031630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, H. H., M. L. DeKay, B. Fischhoff, and M. G. Morgan. 2005. “Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions.” Risk Analysis 25 (2): 405–428. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00599.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, F. J., and E. R. Stone. 1992a. “The Risk Construct.” In Risk-taking Behavior, edited by F. J. Yates, 1–25. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, F. J., and E. R. Stone. 1992b. “Risk Appraisal.” In Risk-taking Behavior, edited by F. J. Yates, 49–85. New York Wiley.
   Google Scholar