How (not) to talk about the uncertain: siting geological disposal for highly radioactive waste in the Czech Republic

References

• van Asselt, M. B. A. 2005. “The Complex Significance of Uncertainty in a Risk Era: Logics, Manners and Strategies in Use.” International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 5 (2/3/4): 125–158.
   Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M. B. A., and O. Renn. 2011. “Risk Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 431–449.10.1080/13669877.2011.553730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T., and O. Renn. 2009. “On Risk Defined as an Event Where the Outcome is Uncertain.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (1): 1–11.10.1080/13669870802488883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthe, Y. 2009. “Framing Nuclear Waste as a Political Issue in France.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (7/8): 941–954.10.1080/13669870903126119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ďurďovič, M., Z. Vajdová, and K. Bernardyová. 2014. “Rozhodování o hlubinném úložišti jaderného odpadu v České republice [Decision-making on geological disposal for radioactive waste in the Czech Republic].” Naše Společnost 2014 (1): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., J. Chalmers, D. Easterling, R. Kasperson, H. Kunreuther, C. K. Mertz, A. Mushkatel, K. D. Pijawka, and P. Slovic with L. Dotto. 1995. One Hundred Centuries of Solitude: Redirecting America’s High-Level Nuclear Waste Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• EGP Invest. 1999. Referenční projekt hlubinného úložiště: B. Souhrnné řešení stavby [Reference project of the geological disposal: B. A comprehensive construction solution]. Prague: SÚRAO.
   Google Scholar
• IRGC. 2005. Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. White Paper no. 1, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, G. 1990. Site Unseen: The Politics of Siting a Nuclear Waste Repository. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy. 41 (3): 223–244.
   Google Scholar
• Kantová, J. 2012. Co by nás mohlo čekat. In Nahlas z Lubenecka, leaflet published by a local citizen association in Lubenec, May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kärnavfallsrådet. 2011. Nuclear Waste State-of-the-Art Report 2011 – Geology, Barriers, Alternatives. Stockholm: Kärnavfallsrådet. (Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste).
   Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2002. “A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies.” Risk Analysis 22 (6): 1071–1094.10.1111/risk.2002.22.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2012. “Adaptive and Integrative Governance on Risk and Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (3): 273–292.10.1080/13669877.2011.636838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopásek, Z., and K. Svačina. 2014. “Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository in the Czech Republic: Twists and Turns towards Technical Democracy.” InSOTEC working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Krajíček, L, V. Soukeník, P. Levá, M. Wichsová, P. Hrdlička, E. Součková, J. Jílek. et al. 2006. Provedení geologických a dalších prací pro hodnocení a zúžení lokalit pro umístění hlubinného úložiště. Předběžná studie proveditelnosti, Svazek B Lokalita Č. 7 – Lodhéřov. [Geological and other works for the assessment and reduction of localities for siting geological disposal. Pre-feasibility study, Volume B, locality no. 7 - Lodhéřov] Prague: SÚRAO.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lietava, P., A. Vokál, F. Woller, and J. Klumpar. 1999. Referenční project hlubinného úložiště. Příloha Č. 2: Posouzení vlivu koncepce hlubinného ukládání na životní prostředí – EIA [Reference project of the geological disposal. Appendix 2: The environmental impact assessment of the Reference project - EIA]. Prague: SÚRAO.
   Google Scholar
• MPO ČR. 2001. Koncepce nakládání s radioaktivními odpady a vyhořelým jaderným palivem v ČR [Strategy for Radioactive Waste Management]. Prague: Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Pospíšková, I., A. Vokál, F. Fiedler, and I. Prachař, and P. Kotnour. 2012. Aktualizace referenčního projektu hlubinného úložiště radioaktivních odpadů v hypotetické lokalitě. Průvodní zpráva [Update of the Reference project of the geological disposal for radioactive waste at a hypothetical location. Accompanying report]. Prague: ÚJV Řež.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. A. 2003. “The Logical Structure of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF): Metatheoretical Foundations and Policy Implications.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, 47–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550461
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G. 2002. The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• SÚRAO. 2012. Geologický průzkum: Hloubit kilometrový vrt je rutinní záležitost [Geological research: One-kilometre-deep drill is a matter of routine]. In Zprávy ze Správy, leaflet published by SÚRAO, June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Svejkovský, J. 2012a. Technická část plánovaného geologického průzkumu. [The technical part of the planned site investigations] In Nahlas z Lubenecka, leaflet published by a local citizen organisation in Lubenec, May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Svejkovský, J. 2012b. Kilometrový vrt v žule není rutinní záležitost [One-kilometre-deep drill is not a matter of routine]. In SOS Lubenec, leaflet published by a local citizen organisation in Lubenec, June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Szakálos, P., and S. Seetharaman. 2012. 2012:17 Technical Note, Corrosion of Copper Canister. Stockholm: Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM).
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, G., I. Verhoeven, and M. Boeckhout. 2011. “Taming Uncertainty: The WRR Approach to Risk Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 485–499.10.1080/13669877.2011.553728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRR. 2009. Uncertain Safety: Allocating Responsibilities for Safety. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1992. “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm.” Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions 2 (2): 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2002. “Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity inside out?” Current Sociology 50 (3): 459–477.10.1177/0011392102050003010
   Google Scholar