‘Ordinary science intelligence’: a science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change

References

• Aasen, M. 2015. “The Polarization of Public Concern about Climate Change in Norway.” Climate Policy advance on-line publication. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1094727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum, N., P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi, and I. Brunton-Smith. 2008. “Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures: A Meta-analysis.” Public Understanding of Science 17: 35–54.10.1177/0963662506070159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Douglas Rivers. 2013. “Cooperative Survey Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (1): 307–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., and A. R. Harkness. 1983. “Estimates of Contingency between Two Dichotomous Variables.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112: 117–135.10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. 1993. “Why Teach Thinking? An Essay.” Applied Psychology 42: 191–214.10.1111/apps.1993.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. 2015. “Supplement to Deppe et al. (2015).” Judgment and Decision Making 10 (4): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, David J., M. Knott, and Irini Moustaki. 2011. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: a Unified Approach. 3rd ed, Wiley series in probability and statistics. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. 2010. Item Response Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. 2012. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1910. “Science as Subject-matter and as Method.” Science 31: 121–127.10.1126/science.31.787.121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. 2010. Measuring Psychological Constructs: Advances in Model-based Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/12074-000
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., and S. P. Reise. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. 2005. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 25–42.10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. 2011. “The Cultural Authority of Science: Public Trust and Acceptance of Organized Science.” Public Understanding of Science 20: 751–770.10.1177/0963662510365246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guterbock, Thomas M, Scott Keeter Holbrook, Susan Losh, Jeff Mondak, Bryce Reeve, Deborah Rexrode, David Sikkink, Sally Stares, Roger Tourangeau, and Chris Toumey. 2011. Measurement and Operationalization of the ‘Science in the Service of Citizens and Consumers' Framework. Center for Survey Research, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. Available at http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/Instrumentation%20Workshop%20Final%20Report.2011-01-31.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C. 2011. “Education, Politics and Opinions about Climate Change Evidence for Interaction Effects.” Climatic Change 104: 231–242.10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., M. J. Cutler, and A. Schaefer. 2012. “Public Knowledge and Concern about Polar-region Warming.” Polar Geography 35: 155–168.10.1080/1088937X.2012.684155
   Google Scholar
• Haran, Uriel, Ilana Ritov, and Barbara A. Mellers. 2013. “The Role of Actively Open-minded Thinking in Information Acquisition, Accuracy, and Calibration.” Judgment and Decision Making 8: 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, E. I., and D. J. Kusterer. 2011. “Behavioral Biases and Cognitive Reflection.” Economics Letters 110: 97–100.10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. 2013. “Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection.” Judgment and Decision Making 8: 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. 2015a. “Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem.” Political Psychology 36: 1–43.10.1111/pops.v36.S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. 2015b. “What is the “Science of Science Communication”?” Journal of Science Communication 14: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L. L. Ouellette, D. Braman, and G. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2: 732–735.10.1038/nclimate1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., E. Peters, E. Dawson, and P. Slovic. 2013. “Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self Government.” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 116, Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992.
   Google Scholar
• Liberali, J. M., V. F. Reyna, S. Furlan, L. M. Stein, and S. T. Pardo. 2011. “Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25:361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., G. Samsa, and B. K. Rimer. 2001. “General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples.” Medical Decision Making 21: 37–44.10.1177/0272989X0102100105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. 2004. “Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Public Understanding of Science 13: 273–294.10.1177/0963662504044908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., E. C. Scott, and S. Okamoto. 2006. “Science Communication: Public Acceptance of Evolution.” Science 313: 765–766.10.1126/science.1126746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. 2010. “Why Did NSF Cut Evolution and the Big Bang from the 2010 Science and Engineering Indicators?” Discover, April 9. http://tinyurl.com/nmhfv5p.
   Google Scholar
• Morizot, J., A. T. Ainsworth, and S. P. Reise. 2007. “Toward Modern Psychometrics: Application of Item Response Theory Models in Personality Research.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, edited by R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, and R. F. Krueger, 407–423. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2014. Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Osterlind, S. J., and H. T. Everson. 2009. Differential Item Functioning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412993913
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, R., and F. Calvo. 2004. “The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues.” Public Understanding of Science 13: 203–227.10.1177/0963662504045002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, E., D. Vastfjall, P. Slovic, C. K. Mertz, K. Mazzocco, and S. Dickert. 2006. “Numeracy and Decision Making.” Psychological Science 17: 407–413.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. 2013. Public’s Knowledge of Science and Technology. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, Valerie F., Wendy L. Nelson, Paul K. Han, and Nathan F. Dieckmann. 2009. “How Numeracy Influences Risk Comprehension and Medical Decision Making.” Pscyh. Bulletin 135: 943–973.10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S., and H. Coates. 2014. “Essential Foundations for Establishing Equivalence in Cross-National Higher Education Assessment.” Higher Education 68: 825–836.10.1007/s10734-014-9746-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissler, L. J., S. I. Duncan, and N. M. Caruso. 2014. “The Relative Importance of Religion and Education on University Students’ Views of Evolution in the Deep South and State Science Standards across the United States.” Evolution Education Outreach 7: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, J. M. 2012. “Measuring Science or Religion? A Measurement Analysis of the National Science Foundation Sponsored Science Literacy Scale 2006–2010.” Public Understanding of Science 23: 797–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L., C. A. Bevier, P. Bobko, F. S. Switzer, and P. Tyler. 2001. “Ethnic Group Differences in Cognitive Ability in Employment and Educational Settings: A Meta-analysis.” Personnel Psychology 54: 297–330.10.1111/peps.2001.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, J., V. H. M. Visschers, and M. Siegrist. 2015. Risk Analysis 35: 2183–2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., and S. Nelson-Barber. 2001. “On the Cultural Validity of Science Assessments.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 553–573.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. 2009. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. 2011. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S. M., and C. Bryant. 2012. “Science and the Public – What Should People Know?” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 2 (1): 81–101.10.1080/09500693.2010.543186
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, M., R. West, and K. Stanovich. 2011. “The Cognitive Reflection Test as a Predictor of Performance on Heuristics-and-Biases Tasks.” Memory & Cognition 39: 1275–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toumey, C. 2011. “Science in the Service of Citizens and Consumers.” Nature Nanotechnology 6: 3–4.10.1038/nnano.2010.263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. 2006. “Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (Yet).” Climatic Change 77: 103–120.10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, J. A., N. F. Dieckmann, M. Tusler, C. Mertz, W. J. Burns, and E. Peters. 2012. “Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26: 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar