Differences in the strengths of evidence matters in risk–risk trade-offs

References

• Andrews, J., G. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, P. Alderson, P. Dahm, Y. Falck-Ytter, M. Nasser, et al. 2012. “GRADE Guidelines: 14. Going from Evidence to Recommendations: The Significance and Presentation of Recommendations.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66: 719–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolakis, G. 1991. “The Concept of Probability in Safety Assessments of Technological Systems.” Science 250: 1359–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T. 2013. “Practical Implications of the New Risk Perspectives.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 115: 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovo, E., and M. Marinacci. 2015. “Decision Analysis under Ambiguity.” European Journal of Operational Research 244: 823–836.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. A. J. R. 2012. “Confronting Deep Uncertainties in Risk Analysis.” Risk Analysis 32: 1607–1629.10.1111/risk.2012.32.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicks, L. 2013. “Bees, Lies and Evidence-based Policy.” Nature 494: 283.10.1038/494283a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013. “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 Amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the Conditions of Approval of the Active Substances Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam and Imidacloprid, and Prohibiting the Use and Sale of Seeds Treated with Plant Protection Products Containing Those Active Substances.” Official Journal of the European Union 139: 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2012. “Statement on the Findings in Recent Studies Investigating Sub-lethal Effects in Bees of Some Neonicotinoids in Consideration of the Uses Currently Authorised in Europe.” EFSA Journal 10: 2752 ( 27 p.).
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2013a. “Conclusion on the Peer Review of the Pesticide Risk Assessment for Bees for the Active Substance Clothianidin.” EFSA Journal 11: 3066 ( 58 p.).
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2013b. “Conclusion on the Peer Review of the Pesticide Risk Assessment for Bees for the Active Substance Imidacloprid.” EFSA Journal 11: 3068 ( 55 p.).
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2013c. “Conclusion on the Peer Review of the Pesticide Risk Assessment for Bees for the Active Substance Thiamethoxam.” EFSA Journal 11: 3067 ( 68 p.).
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2013d. “Guidance on the Risk Assessment of Plant Protection Products on Bees (Apis Mellifera, Bombus Spp. and Solitary Bees).” EFSA Journal 11: 3295. 268 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2015. Pesticides and Bees: Call for Data. Accessed 22 September 2015. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/150522
   Google Scholar
• EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization). 2003. “Environmental Risk Assessment Scheme for Plant Protection Products: Chapter 7: Aquatic Organisms.” OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 33: 147–149.
   Google Scholar
• EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization). 2010. “Environmental Risk Assessment Scheme for Plant Protection Products: Chapter 10: Honeybees.” OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 40: 323–331.
   Google Scholar
• Fryday, S., K. Tiede, and J. Stein. 2015. Scientific Services to Support EFSA Systematic Reviews: Lot 5 Systematic Literature Review on the Neonicotinoids (Namely Active Substances Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam and Imidacloprid) and the Risks to Bees. EFSA Supporting Publication 2015: EN-756, 656 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. J., O. Ramos-Rodriguez, and N. E. Raine. 2012. “Combined Pesticide Exposure Severely Affects Individual- and Colony-level Traits in Bees.” Nature 491: 105–108.10.1038/nature11585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfray, H. C. J., T. Blacquière, L. M. Field, R. S. Hails, G. Petrokofsky, S. G. Potts, N. E. Raine, A. J. Vanbergen, and A. R. McLean. 2014. “A Restatement of the Natural Science Evidence Base concerning Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Insect Pollinators.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 20140558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0558. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfray, H. C. J., T. Blacquière, L. M. Field, R. S. Hails, S. G. Potts, N. E. Raine, A. J. Vanbergen, and A. R. McLean. 2015. “A Restatement of Recent Advances in the Natural Science Evidence Base concerning Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Insect Pollinators.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20151821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1821. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., G. Reay, and J. Watson. 2014. “Insecticide Use on Scottish Oilseed Rape Crops: Historical Use Patterns and Pest Control Options in the Absence of Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments.” Proceedings Crop Protection in Northern Britain 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jeschke, P., R. Nauen, M. Schindler, and A. Elbert. 2011. “Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59: 2897–2908.10.1021/jf101303g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R., and A. Schlag. 2016. “Risk-risk Tradeoffs: What Should We Do in Europe?” Journal of Risk Research. doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1153505.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrandrea, M. D., C. B. Field, T. F. Stocker, O. Edenhofer, K. L. Ebi, D. J. Frame, H. Held, et al. 2010. “Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Accessed 7 July 2015. http://www.ipcc.ch
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, K., S. D. Buckingham, D. Kleier, J. J. Rauh, M. Grauso, and D. B. Sattelle. 2001. “Neonicotinoids: Insecticides Acting on Insect Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 22: 573–580.10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01820-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh, A., and V. M. Bier. 1996. “Uncertainty about Probability: A Reconciliation with the Subjectivist Viewpoint.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 26: 303–310.10.1109/3468.487956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht, S. L., M. E. Borsuk, and P. Reichert. 2012. “Bridging Uncertain and Ambiguous Knowledge with Imprecise Probabilities.” Environmental Modelling and Software 36: 122–130.10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlöf, M., G. K. S. Andersson, R. Bommarco, I. Fries, V. Hederström, L. Herbertsson, O. Jonsson, et al. 2015. “Seed Coating with a Neonicotinoid Insecticide Negatively Affects Wild Bees.” Nature 521: 77–80.10.1038/nature14420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., and H. Riesch. 2011. “Don’t Know, Can’t Know: Embracing Deeper Uncertainties When Analysing Risks.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369: 4730–4750.10.1098/rsta.2011.0163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troffaes, M. 2007. “Decision Making under Uncertainty Using Imprecise Probabilities.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 45: 17–29.10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehorn, P. R., S. O’Connor, F. L. Wackers, and D. Goulson. 2012. “Neonicotinoid Pesticide Reduces Bumble Bee Colony Growth and Queen Production.” Science 336: 351–352.10.1126/science.1215025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar