A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues

References

• Alaszewski, A., and T. Horlick-Jones. 2002. Risk and Health: Review of Current Research and Identification of Areas for Further Research. Canterbury: Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Arvai, J. L. 2003. “Using Risk Communication to Disclose the Outcome of a Participatory Decision-Making Process: Effects on the Perceived Acceptability of Risk-Policy Decisions.” Risk Analysis 23 (2): 281–289. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvai, J. L., R. Gregory, and T. L. McDaniels. 2001. “Testing a Structured Decision Approach: Value-Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 21 (6): 1065–1076. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.216175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M. B. A., and O. Renn. 2011. “Risk Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 431–449.10.1080/13669877.2011.553730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmuth, T., M. Hildén, and C. Benighaus. 2010. “Integrated Risk Assessment and Risk Governance as Socio-Political Phenomena: A Synthetic View of the Challenges.” Science of the Total Environment 408 (18): 3943–3953. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmuth, T., M. Hildén, and M. Craye. 2010. “Beyond REACH: Roadblocks and Shortcuts En Route to Integrated Risk Assessment and Management of Chemicals.” Science of the Total Environment 408 (18): 3954–3963. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T. 2011. “On Risk Governance Deficits.” Safety Science 49 (6): 912–919. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T., and O. Renn. 2012. “On the Risk Management and Risk Governance of Petroleum Operations in the Barents Sea Area.” Risk Analysis 32 (9): 1561–1575. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01777.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. 2009. “The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science - Discourse and Comparative Evidence.” Science, Technology and Society 14 (2): 221–240.10.1177/097172180901400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., N. Allum, and S. Miller. 2007. “What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (1): 79–95.10.1177/0963662506071287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., H. Corvellec, and M. Karlsson. 2012. “The Practice of Risk Governance: Lessons from the Field.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.587886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M., and M. Karlsson. 2013. “Responsible Procurement, Complex Product Chains and the Integration of Vertical and Horizontal Governance.” Environmental Policy and Governance 23 (6): 381–394. doi:10.1002/eet.1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., J. Petts, and J. Evans. 2010. “The Importance of Context for Effective Public Engagement: Learning from the Governance of Waste.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (8): 991–1009. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.495503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challies, E., J. Newig, T. Thaler, E. Kochskämper, and M. Levin-Keitel. 2016. “Participatory and Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Flood Risk Management: An Emerging Research Agenda.” Environmental Science and Policy 55: 275–280. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. 2007. “Towards Analytic-Deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste.” Journal of Risk Research 10 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1080/13669870601147581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. 2008. “Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation: Mapping an Emergent Epistemic Community.” Environment and Planning a 40 (12): 2990–3008. doi:10.1068/a39279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and J. Burgess. 2008. “Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance.” Environment and Planning a 40 (8): 1881–1900. doi:10.1068/a40334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchi, B., and J. R. Ravetz. 1999. “Risk Management and Governance.” Futures 31 (7): 743–757. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00030-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H. F. G., E. van Rongen, G. Eggermont, E. Lebret, W. E. Bijker, and D. R. M. Timmermans. 2011. “The Role of Scientific Advisory Bodies in Precaution-Based Risk Governance Illustrated with the Issue of Uncertain Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (4): 451–466. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.553729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, M., M. Boström, and A. M. Jönsson. 2014. “Participatory Deliberation, Risk Governance and Management of the Marine Region in the European Union.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 16 (4): 497–515. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.866891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, S. B., H. A. J. Mulder, and L. J. Frewer. 2014. “Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement: A European Study.” Science Technology and Human Values 40 (3): 421–444. doi:10.1177/0162243914550319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 1995. “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process.” Risk Analysis 15 (2): 137–145. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M., S. Greiving, F. Flex, M. Scheibel, T. Stickler, N. Sereinig, G. Koboltschnig, et al. 2012. “Improving the Active Involvement of Stakeholders and the Public in Flood Risk Management – Tools of an Involvement Strategy and Case Study Results from Austria, Germany and Italy.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 12 (9): 2785–2798. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-2785-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 2001. From Bibliographic Coupling to Co-Citation Analysis via Algorithmic Historio-Bibliography. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Greiving, S., S. Pratzler-Wanczura, K. Sapountzaki, F. Ferri, P. Grifoni, K. Firus, and G. Xanthopoulos. 2012. “Linking the Actors and Policies throughout the Disaster Management Cycle By ‘agreement on Objectives’ – A New Output-Oriented Management Approach.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 12 (4): 1085–1107. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1085-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieger, K. D., F. Wickson, H. B. Andersen, and O. Renn. 2012. “Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano- Remediation?” International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society 10 (1): 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R., and A. Irwin. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe.” Minerva 44 (2): 167–184. doi:10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., L. Holm, L. Frewer, P. Robinson, and P. Sandøe. 2003. “Beyond the Knowledge Deficit: Recent Research into Lay and Expert Attitudes to Food Risks.” Appetite 41 (2): 111–121.10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L. T., P. P. J. Driessen, C. Dieperink, M. Wiering, G. T. T. Raadgever, and H. F. M. W. van Rijswick. 2014. “Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance.” Water Resources Management 28 (12): 4127–4142. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0732-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, A. G., R. M. Plaza, and R. Palmén. 2011. “The Framing of Risk and Implications for Policy and Governance: The Case of EMF.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (3): 319–333. doi:10.1177/0963662509336712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., and A. Prades. 2009. “On Interpretative Risk Perception Research: Some Reflections on Its Origins; Its Nature; and Its Possible Applications in Risk Communication Practice.” Health, Risk & Society 11 (5): 409–430.10.1080/13698570903180448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRGC. 2005. Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach, White Paper No. 1, O. Renn with an Annex by P. Graham. Geneva: IRGC.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, A. L., G. Wong-Parodi, T. Webler, and P. C. Stern. 2015. “Eliciting Public Concerns about an Emerging Energy Technology: The Case of Unconventional Shale Gas Development in the United States.” Energy Research and Social Science 8: 139–150. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1998. “The Political Science of Risk Perception.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 (1): 91–99.10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00129-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1999. “The Songlines of Risk.” Environmental Values 8 (2): 135–152.10.3197/096327199129341761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2012. “Adaptive and Integrative Governance on Risk and Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (3): 273–292. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.636838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2014. “Expertise and Experience: A Deliberative System of a Functional Division of Labor for Post-Normal Risk Governance.” Innovation 27 (4): 442–465. doi:10.1080/13511610.2014.943160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloprogge, P., and J. P. van der Sluijs. 2006. “The Inclusion of Stakeholder Knowledge and Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change.” Climatic Change 75 (3): 359–389. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-0362-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komendantova, N., R. Mrzyglocki, A. Mignan, B. Khazai, F. Wenzel, A. Patt, and K. Fleming. 2014. “Multi-Hazard and Multi-Risk Decision-Support Tools as a Part of Participatory Risk Governance: Feedback from Civil Protection Stakeholders.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 8: 50–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C., I. Callsen, and C. Begg. 2016. “Reputational Risks and Participation in Flood Risk Management and the Public Debate about the 2013 Flood in Germany.” Environmental Science and Policy 55: 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. 1996. “Three Phases in the Evolution of Risk Communication Practice.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545 (1): 85–94.10.1177/0002716296545001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, S., M. Dreyer, and P. Sellke. 2011. “The Regional Advisory Councils: What is Their Potential to Incorporate Stakeholder Knowledge into Fisheries Governance?” Ambio 40 (2): 133–143. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0125-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, S., M. Gilek, M. Karlsson, and O. Udovyk. 2014. “Unravelling Science-Policy Interactions in Environmental Risk Governance of the Baltic Sea: Comparing Fisheries and Eutrophication.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (4): 505–523. doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.794154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E. 2004. “Risk Communication and Management in the 21st Century.” International Public Management Journal 7: 335–346.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L. P., P. P. J. Driessen, and H. A. C. Runhaar. 2014. “Legitimate Adaptive Flood Risk Governance beyond the Dikes: The Cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam.” Regional Environmental Change 14 (2): 671–682. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0527-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., E. Kochskämper, E. Challies, and N. W. Jager. 2016. “Exploring Governance Learning: How Policymakers Draw on Evidence, Experience and Intuition in Designing Participatory Flood Risk Planning.” Environmental Science and Policy 55: 353–360. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. W., P. C. Stern, T. Webler, and P. Field. 2014. “Public and Stakeholder Participation for Managing and Reducing the Risks of Shale Gas Development.” Environmental Science and Technology 48 (15): 8388–8396. doi:10.1021/es405170k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oen, A. M. P., M. Sparrevik, D. N. Barton, U. S. Nagothu, G. J. Ellen, G. D. Breedveld, J. Skei, and A. Slob. 2010. “Sediment and Society: An Approach for Assessing Management of Contaminated Sediments and Stakeholder Involvement in Norway.” Journal of Soils and Sediments 10 (2): 202–208. doi:10.1007/s11368-009-0182-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470754887
   Google Scholar
• Petts, J. 2004. “Barriers to Participation and Deliberation in Risk Decisions: Evidence from Waste Management.” Journal of Risk Research 7 (2): 115–133. doi:10.1080/1366987042000158695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J. 2008. “Public Engagement to Build Trust: False Hopes?” Journal of Risk Research 11 (6): 821–835. doi:10.1080/13669870701715592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J., and B. Leach. 2000. Evaluating Methods for Public Participation: Literature Review. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. 2008. “Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement.” In Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Gabriele Bammer and Michael Smithson, 349–361. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., I. Lorenzoni, and W. Poortinga. 2008. “Climate Change or Nuclear Power-No Thanks! a Quantitative Study of Public Perceptions and Risk Framing in Britain.” Global Environmental Change 18 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., and T. Rogers-Hayden. 2007. “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or “Upstream Engagement”?” Health, Risk and Society 9 (2): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. R. 1999. “What is Post-Normal Science.” Futures 31 (7): 647–653. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 1998. “Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges.” Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 49–71.10.1080/136698798377321
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and P. Graham. 2005. IRGC, International Risk Governance Council. White Paper on Risk Governance. Towards an Integrative Approach. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and K. Walker. 2008. “Lessons Learned: A Re-Assessment of the IRGC Framework on Risk Governance.” In Global Risk Governance: Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework, edited by Ortwin Renn and Katherine Walker, 331–367. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and P.-J. Schweizer. 2009. “Inclusive Risk Governance: Concepts and Application to Environmental Policy Making.” Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (3): 174–185. doi:10.1002/eet.507.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., K. D. Grieger, K. Øien, and H. B. Andersen. 2013. “Benefit-Risk Trade-Offs in Retrospect: How Major Stakeholders Perceive the Decision-Making Process in the Barents Sea Oil Field Development.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (9): 1163–1185. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.761266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and A. Klinke. 2014. “Risk Governance: Application to Urban Planning.” A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 11 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science Technology and Human Values 30 (2): 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and N. Pidgeon. 2005. “Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate about Transgenic Crops.” Public Understanding of Science 14 (4): 331–352. doi:10.1177/0963662505056611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, W. Poortinga, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2008. “Analysis of a Normative Framework for Evaluating Public Engagement Exercises: Reliability, Validity and Limitations.” Public Understanding of Science 17 (4): 419–441. doi:10.1177/0963662506075351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. A. C., P. P. J. Driessen, L. van Bree, and J. P. van der Sluijs. 2010. “A Meta-Level Analysis of Major Trends in Environmental Health Risk Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (3): 319–335. doi:10.1080/13669870903139070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., C. Gomes, S. Guerreiro, and T. O’Riordan. 2014. “Are We All on the Same Boat? The Challenge of Adaptation Facing Portuguese Coastal Communities: Risk Perception, Trust-Building and Genuine Participation.” Land Use Policy 38: 355–365. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolobig, A. 2015. “Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers to Landslide Risk Governance.” Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84929429536&partnerID=40&md5=e3b9ebb3b0e0ab4f8dd01c315e067070.
   Google Scholar
• Scolobig, A., N. Komendantova, A. Patt, C. Vinchon, D. Monfort-Climent, M. Begoubou-Valerius, P. Gasparini, and A. Di Ruocco. 2014. “Multi-Risk Governance for Natural Hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe.” Natural Hazards 73 (3): 1523–1545. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1152-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolobig, A., M. Thompson, and J. Linnerooth-Bayer. 2015. “Compromise Not Consensus: Designing a Participatory Process for Landslide Risk Mitigation.” Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84947086833&partnerID=40&md5=746e0957c05480f97b3e7368f1d55f12.
   Google Scholar
• Small, Henry. 1973. “Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (4): 265–269.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. J., P. C. Stern, E. Bomberg, S. M. Christopherson, B. D. Goldstein, A. L. Israel, R. B. Jackson, et al. 2014. “Risks and Risk Governance in Unconventional Shale Gas Development.” Environmental Science and Technology 48 (15): 8289–8297. doi:10.1021/es502111u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrevik, M., and G. D. Breedveld. 2010. “From Ecological Risk Assessments to Risk Governance: Evaluation of the Norwegian Management System for Contaminated Sediments.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 6 (2): 240–248. doi:10.1897/IEAM-2009-049.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spruijt, P., A. B. Knol, E. Vasileiadou, J. Devilee, E. Lebret, and A. C. Petersen. 2014. “Roles of Scientists as Policy Advisers on Complex Issues: A Literature Review.” Environmental Science & Policy 40: 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2007. “Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle.” EMBO Reports 8 (4): 309–315. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “‘Opening up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.2307/29734034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A., and I. Scoones. 2009. “From Risk Assessment to Knowledge Mapping: Science, Precaution, and Participation in Disease Ecology.” Ecology and Society 14 (2). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-73849109204&partnerID=40&md5=1cfb85a01719800b41599199eebee39e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., and J. O. Zinn. 2006. “Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology.” Risk Analysis 26 (2): 397–411.10.1111/risk.2006.26.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., and A. Harden. 2008. “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (1): 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., M. Jones, and I. Lorenzoni. 2011. “Where Now for Post-Normal Science?: a Critical Review of Its Development, Definitions, and Uses.” Science Technology and Human Values 36 (3): 287–306. doi:10.1177/0162243910385789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., I. Lorenzoni, and M. Jones. 2009. “Noisy and Definitely Not Normal: Responding to Wicked Issues in the Environment, Energy and Health.” Environmental Science and Policy 12 (3): 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udovyk, O., and M. Gilek. 2014. “Participation and Post-Normal Science in Practice? Reality Check for Hazardous Chemicals Management in the European Marine Environment.” Futures 63: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Sluijs, J. P., M. Craye, S. Funtowicz, P. Kloprogge, J. Ravetz, and J. Risbey. 2005. “Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model-Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System.” Risk Analysis 25 (2): 481–492.10.1111/risk.2005.25.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachinger, G., O. Renn, C. Begg, and C. Kuhlicke. 2013. “The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards.” Risk Analysis 33 (6): 1049–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J., T. O’Riordan, T. Horlick-Jones, and J. Niewöhner. 2005. “The Meta?Governance of Risk and New Technologies: GM Crops and Mobile Telephones.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (7–8): 635–661. doi:10.1080/13669870500101200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1981. “Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (3): 163–171.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, H. H., M. L. DeKay, M. G. Morgan, H. K. Florig, and P. S. Fischbeck. 2004. “Ecological Risk Ranking: Development and Evaluation of a Method for Improving Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making.” Risk Analysis 24 (2): 363–378. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00438.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., H. K. Florig, and M. L. DeKay. 2011. “Evaluating an Analytic–Deliberative Risk‐Ranking Process in a Chinese Context.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (7): 899–918. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.571788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2004. “Literature Review: Sociology and Risk.” Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network Working Paper, no. 2004/1. Canterbury: University of Kent.
   Google Scholar