An explanatory analysis of perceived risk decision weights (perceived-risk attitudes) and perceived benefit decision weights (perceived-benefit attitudes) in risk-value models

References

• Alempaki, D., C. Starmer, and F. Tufano. 2019. “On the Priming of Risk Preferences: The Role of Fear and General Affect.” Journal of Economic Psychology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487018302940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhakami, A. S., and P. Slovic. 1994. “A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit.” Risk Analysis 14(6): 1085–1096. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. Elisabet Rutström. 2008. “Lost in State Space: Are Preferences Stable?*.” International Economic Review 49(3): 1091–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00507.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. R., and E. U. Weber. 2006. “A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations.” Judgment and Decision Making 1(1): 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempo, R. N., W. P. Bottom, and E. U. Weber. 1997. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception: A Model-Based Approach.” Risk Analysis 17(4): 479–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00888.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T. 2015. “Predicting Performance on the Columbia Card Task: Effects of Personality Characteristics, Mood, and Executive Functions.” Assessment 22(2): 178–187. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and A. Imas. 2013. “Experimental Methods: Eliciting Risk Preferences.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87: 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, Y., and L. Schechter. 2015. “Stability of Experimental and Survey Measures of Risk, Time, and Social Preferences: A Review and Some New Results.” Journal of Development Economics 117: 151–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, M., and M. Siegrist. 2016. “The Stability of Risk and Benefit Perceptions: A Longitudinal Study Assessing the Perception of Biotechnology.” Journal of Risk Research 19(4): 461–475. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.988169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, C. H., R. M. Dawes, and A. Tversky. 1977. Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction [Wprowadzenie Do Psychologii Matematycznej]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, M. 2014. “Eliciting Risk-Preferences in Socio-Economic Surveys: How Do Different Measures Perform?.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 48: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto, P., and A. Filippin. 2013. “The “Bomb” Risk Elicitation Task.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 47(1): 31–65. doi: 10.1007/s11166-013-9170-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G. G. Wagner. 2011. “Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and Behavioral Consequences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3): 522–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajkowska, M. 2018. “Personality Traits: Hierarchically Organized Systems.” Journal of Personality 86(1): 36–54. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajkowska, M., and S. Kreitler. 2018. “Status of the Trait Concept in Contemporary Personality Psychology: Are the Old Questions Still the Burning Questions?.” Journal of Personality 86(1): 5–11. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figner, B., R. J. Mackinlay, F. Wilkening, and E. U. Weber. 2009. “Affective and Deliberative Processes in Risky Choice: Age Differences in Risk Taking in the Columbia Card Task.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35(3): 709–730. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figner, B., and E. U. Weber. 2011. “Who Takes Risks When and Why?: Determinants of Risk Taking.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(4): 211–216. doi: 10.1177/0963721411415790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figner, B., and E. U. Weber. 2015. “Personality and Risk Taking.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes, 2nd edition, Volume 17, 809–813. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, and S. M. Johnson. 2000. “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., and J. L. Holup. 2006. “Risk as Value: Combining Affect and Analysis in Risk Judgments.” Journal of Risk Research 9(2): 141–164. doi: 10.1080/13669870500166930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. “How Safe Is Safe Enough? a Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences 9(2): 127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, R., A. Pedroni, R. Mata, J. Rieskamp, and R. Hertwig. 2017. “Risk Preference Shares the Psychometric Structure of Major Psychological Traits.” Science Advances 3(10): e1701381. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y. 2000. “Judging Risk and Return of Financial Assets.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83(2): 353–370. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann. 2003. “A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains.” Journal of Research in Personality 37(6): 504–528. (03)00046-1 doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hae Ahn, G., and S. Chafik. 2015. dospert R package (Version 0.5). Retrieved from https://github.com/schafik/dospert
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., E. Johnson, M. M. McInnes, and E. E. Rutström. 2005. “Temporal Stability of Estimates of Risk Aversion.” Applied Financial Economics Letters 1(1): 31–35. doi: 10.1080/1744654042000311576.
   Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., C. D. Nye, D. C. Zhang, and T. B. Rada. 2017. “Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2): 400–406. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A, and S. K. Laury. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” American Economic Review 92(5):1644–1655. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsee, C., and E. U. Weber. 1999. “Cross-National Differences in Risk Preference and Lay Predictions.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12(2): 165–179. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<165::AID-BDM316>3.0.CO;2-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, J., J. S. Dyer, and J. C. Butler. 1999. “Measures of Perceived Risk.” Management Science 45(4): 519–532. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.4.519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochemczyk, Ł., J. Pietrzak, R. Buczkowski, M. Stolarski, and Ł. Markiewicz. 2017. “You Only Live Once: Present-Hedonistic Time Perspective Predicts Risk Propensity.” Personality and Individual Differences, 115: 148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2002. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice.” Nobel Prize Lecture 8: 351–401.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kempf, A., C. Merkle, and A. Niessen-Ruenzi. 2014. “Low Risk and High Return – Affective Attitudes and Stock Market Expectations.” European Financial Management 20(5): 995–1030. doi: 10.1111/eufm.12001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. S., C. R. Sahm, and M. D. Shapiro. 2008. “Imputing Risk Tolerance from Survey Responses.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(483): 1028–1038. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz, D. H., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. 1971. Foundations of Measurement: Additive and Polynomial Representations. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kubińska, E., and Ł. Markiewicz. 2012a. “Different Ways of Measuring Investment Risk – the Psychological vs. the Financial Perspective [Różne Podejścia Do Mierzenia Ryzyka Inwestycyjnego - Perspektywa Psychologiczna i Finansowa].” Zeszyty Naukowe. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie. Seria Finanse 889: 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kubińska, E., and Ł. Markiewicz. 2012b. “Risk Measurement as a Challenge to Contemporary Finance [Pomiar Ryzyka Jako Wyzwanie Dla Współczesnych Finansów].” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia 46(1): 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lauriola, M., and I. P. Levin. 2001. “Personality Traits and Risky Decision-Making in a Controlled Experimental Task: An Exploratory Study.” Personality and Individual Differences 31(2): 215–226. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00130-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejuez, C. W., J. P. Read, C. W. Kahler, J. B. Richards, S. E. Ramsey, G. L. Stuart, et al. 2002. “Evaluation of a Behavioral Measure of Risk Taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8(2): 75–84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., E. U. Weber, C. K. Hsee, and N. Welch. 2001. “Risk as Feelings.” Psychological Bulletin 127(2): 267–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist, J.-E., M. Verkasalo, G. Walkowitz, and P. C. Wichardt. 2015. “Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes in the Lab: Task or Ask? An Empirical Comparison.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 119: 254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., and J. W. Tukey. 1964. “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1(1): 1–27. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. 2018. sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. R package, version 2.4.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. R., and D. A. Wehrung. 1990. “Characteristics of Risk Taking Executives.” Management Science 36(4): 422–435. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.36.4.422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, Ł., and E. Kubinska. 2015. “Information Use Differences in Hot and Cold Risk Processing: When Does Information about Probability Count in the Columbia Card Task?” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1 –11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, Ł., E. Kubinska, and T. Tyszka. 2015. “Confounding Dynamic Risk Taking Propensity with a Momentum Prognostic Strategy: The Case of the Columbia Card Task (CCT)”. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, Ł., and E. U. Weber. 2013. “DOSPERT’s Gambling Risk-Taking Propensity Scale Predicts Excessive Stock Trading.” Journal of Behavioral Finance 14(1): 65–78. doi: 10.1080/15427560.2013.762000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” The Journal of Finance 7(1): 77–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., and O. P. John. 1992. “An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications.” Journal of Personality 60(2): 175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalaszek-Geerdink, A. 2013. Zależność między oceną a akceptacją ryzyka - procesy tożsame czy różne (nieopublikowana praca doktorska). (PhD.), Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej w Warszawie, Warszawa. Retrieved from official DOSPERT webpage (https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/decisionsciences/research/tools/dospert
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, N.,. E. Soane, M. Fenton‐O’Creevy, and P. Willman. 2005. “Personality and Domain‐Specific Risk Taking.” Journal of Risk Research 8(2): 157–176. doi: 10.1080/1366987032000123856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, B. D, and J. Suls. 2000. “Self-, Other-, and Ideal-Judgments of Risk and Caution as a Function of the Five-Factor Model of Personality.” Personality and Individual Differences 28(3):425–436. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00105-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panno, A., M. Lauriola, and B. Figner. 2013. “Emotion Regulation and Risk Taking: Predicting Risky Choice in Deliberative Decision Making.” Cognition and Emotion 27(2): 326–334. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.707642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penolazzi, B., P. Gremigni, and P. M. Russo. 2012. “Impulsivity and Reward Sensitivity Differentially Influence Affective and Deliberative Risky Decision Making.” Personality and Individual Differences 53(5): 655–659. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Sahm, C. R. 2012. “How Much Does Risk Tolerance Change?.” Quarterly Journal of Finance 02(04): 1250020. doi: 10.1142/S2010139212500206.
   Google Scholar
• Sarin, R. K., and M. Weber. 1993. “Risk-Value Models.” European Journal of Operational Research 70(2):135–149. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90033-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, C. 2015. LimeSurvey: An Open Source Survey Tool. Hamburg, Germany: LimeSurvey Project Team. Retrieved from http://www.limesurvey.org
   Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H. M. 2001. “Do Investors Expect Higher Returns from Safer Stocks than from Riskier Stocks?.” SSRN eLibrary 2(4): 176–181. doi: 10.1207/S15327760JPFM0204_1
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. J., and R. H. Fazio. 1983. “Parallals between Attitudes and Traits as Predictors of Behavior.” Journal of Personality 51(3): 308–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00336.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. B., and L. R. Weingart. 1995. “Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity.” Academy of Management Journal 38(6): 1573–1592. doi: 10.2307/256844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and G. MacGregor. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality.” Risk Analysis 24(2): 311–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soane, E., C. Dewberry, and S. Narendran. 2010. “The Role of Perceived Costs and Perceived Benefits in the Relationship between Personality and Risk‐Related Choices.” Journal of Risk Research 13(3): 303–318. doi: 10.1080/13669870902987024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillwell, W. G., D. A. Seaver, and W. Edwards. 1981. “A Comparison of Weight Approximation Techniques in Multiattribute Utility Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28(1): 62–77. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90015-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyszka, T. 2010. “Decyzje. Perspektywa psychologiczna i ekonomiczna.” In Wykłady z Psychologii, edited by J. Brzeziński, Vol. 16, 299–327. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., and M. Siegrist. 2013. “How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study before and after the Fukushima Disaster.” Risk Analysis 33(2): 333–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wärneryd, K. E. 1996. “Risk Attitudes and Risky Behavior.” Journal of Economic Psychology 17(6): 749–770. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(96)00034-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E, and B. Kirsner. 1997. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14(1):41–61. doi: 10.1023/A:1007769703493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008)."Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference". In Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain, P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), (pp. 127-144). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U. 2001. “Personality and Risk Taking.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes, 11274–11276. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., A. R. Blais, and N. E. Betz. 2002. “A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15(4): 263–290. doi: 10.1002/bdm.414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., and C. Hsee. 1998. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, But Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes towards Perceived Risk.” Management Science 44(9): 1205–1217. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., and R. A. Milliman. 1997. “Perceived Risk Attitudes: Relating Risk Perception to Risky Choice.” Management Science 43(2): 123–144. doi: 10.2307/2661678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., E. U. Weber, and A. Nosić. 2012. “Who Takes Risks When and Why: Determinants of Changes in Investor Risk Taking*.” Review of Finance 17(3): 847–883. doi: 10.1093/rof/rfs024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, J. A., and A. Tikir. 2011. “Predicting Domain-Specific Risk Taking with the HEXACO Personality Structure.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 24(2): 180–201. doi: 10.1002/bdm.677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, J. F., and E. R. Stone. 1992. “The Risk Construct.” In Risk-Taking Behavior, 1–25. Oxford, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zaleśkiewicz, T. 2001. “Beyond Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Personality and the Dual Nature of Economic Risk Taking.” European Journal of Personality 15:S105–S122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaleśkiewicz, T. 2005. Necessity or Pleasure? the Psychology of Risk Perception and Risk Taking [Przyjemnośc Czy Konieczność. Psychologia Postrzegania i Podejmowania Ryzyka]. Gdańsk: GWP.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. C., G. C. Foster, and M. G. McKenna. 2019. “Is the DOSPERT Gender Invariant? a Psychometric Test of Measurement Invariance.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 0(0). doi: 10.1002/bdm.2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. 1994. Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar