The key to risk communication success. The longitudinal effect of risk message repetition on actual self-protective behavior of primary school children

References

• Bandura, A. 2004. “Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means.” Health Education & Behavior 31 (2): 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K. H., and A. Frankel. 1981. “A Conceptualization of Threat Communications and Protective Health Behavior.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44 (3): 204–217. doi:10.2307/3033834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. 1970. “Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value.” Perception & Psychophysics 8: 279–286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Apple-ton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Brandweer Twente. 1971. “Risk Factory.” http://www.troned.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Broström, Stig, Inge Johansson, Anette Sandberg, and Thorleif Frøkjaer. 2014. “Preschool Teachers’ View on Learning in Preschool in Sweden and Denmark.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 22 (5): 590–603. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2012.746199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., R. O. Salvador, K. Smith-Crowe, S. Chan-Serafin, A. Smith, and S. Sonesh. 2011. “The Dread Factor: How Hazards and Safety Training Influence Learning and Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (1): 46–70. doi:10.1037/a0021838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., and R. E. Petty. 1979. “Effect of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., and R. E. Petty. 1989. “Effects of Message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 10 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campell, M. C., and K. L. Keller. 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertisement Repetition.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 292–304. doi:10.1086/376800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Marques, T., and D. M. Mackie. 2001. “The Feeling of Familiarity as a Regulator of Persuasive Processing.” Social Cognition 19 (1): 9–34. doi:10.1521/soco.19.1.9.18959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, T., and C. C. Bracken. 2005. “Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model.” Health Education & Behavior 32 (1): 27–41. doi:10.1177/1090198104266901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., and K. Tisdall. 2014. Children and Society. Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, C. H. 2017. “Preventing School Shootings: The Effectiveness of Safety Measures.” Victims & Offenders 12 (6): 956–973. doi:10.1080/15564886.2017.1307293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievik, M., and J. M. Gutteling. 2011. “Yes, We Can: Motivate Dutch Citizens to Engage in Self Protective Behavior.” Natural Hazards 59 (3): 1475–1490. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9845-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievik, M., E. F. J. Misana – ter Huurne, J. M. Gutteling, and E. Giebels. 2018. “Making It Stick: exploring the Effect of Information and Behavioral Training on Self-Protectiveness of Citizens in a Real-Life Safety Setting.” Safety Science 101: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievik, M., E. F. J. ter Huurne, and J. M. Gutteling. 2012. “The Action Suited to the Word: Use of the Framework of Risk Information Seeking to Understand Risk-Related Behaviors.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (2): 131–147. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.601318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinateder, Max, Paul Pauli, Mathias Müller, Jürgen Krieger, Frank Heimbecher, Inga Rönnau, Ulrich Bergerhausen, Götz Vollmann, Peter Vogt, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2013. “Human Behavior in Severe Tunnel Accidents:Effect of Information and Behavioral Training.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 17: 20–32. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., and T. Zerback. 2013. “Helpful or Harmful? How Frequent Repetition Affects Perceived Statement Credibility.” Journal of Communication 63 (6): 993–1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latkin, C. A., V. Forman, A. Knowlton, and S. Sherman. 2003. “Norms, Social Networks, and HIV Related Behaviors among Urban Disadvantages Drug Users.” Social Science & Medicine 56 (3): 465–476. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00047-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 2000. “Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard: A Review of Research.” Environmental Behavior 32: 590–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 2012. “The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence.” Risk Analysis 34 (4): 616–632. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., L. Haddon, A. Görzig, and K. Ólafsson. 2010. Risks and Safety on the Internet. London: EU Kids Online.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, X., X. Xie, and L. Liu. 2015. “Inverted U-Shaped Model: How Frequent Repetition Affects Perceived Risk.” Judgment and Decision Making 10 (3): 219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. G., S. Bridgers, T. L. Griffiths, and A. Gopnik. 2014. “When Children Are Better (or at Leastmore Open-Minded) Learners than Adults: Developmental Differences in Learning the Forms of Causal Relationships.” Cognition 131 (2): 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Igor, Geertje Bekebrede, Casper Harteveld, Harald Warmelink, Qiqi Zhou, Theo van Ruijven, Julia Lo, Rens Kortmann, and Ivo Wenzler. 2014. “The Research and Evaluation of Serious Games: Toward a Comprehensive Methodology.” British Journal of Educational Technology 45 (3): 502–527. doi:10.1111/bjet.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. 2006. “Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research: 1996–2005.” Journal of Health Communication 11 (1): 75–91. doi:10.1080/10810730500461091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhielm, C. L. 2002. “The Influence of Level of Processing on Advertising Repetition Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (3): 371–382. doi:10.1086/344428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, C., and D. W. Stewart. 1988. “Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout.” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 11: 285–329.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, L. N., Z. J. Yang, M. Seo, and M. Harrison. 2014. “The “I” in Climate Change: The Role of Individual Responsibility in Systematic Processing of Climate Change Information.” Global Environmental Change 26: 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, R. A. C., D. Abraham, and G. J. Kok. 2001. “Scary Warnings and Rational Precautions: A Review of the Psychology of Fear Appeals.” Psychology & Health 16: 613–630. doi:10.1080/08870440108405863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwebel, D. C., and L. A. McClure. 2010. “Using Virtual Reality to Train Children in Safe Street-Crossing Skills.” Injury Prevention 16 (1): e1–5. doi:10.1136/ip.2009.025288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, J., and S. W. Smith. 2016. “The Effects of Fear Appeal Message Repetition on Perceived Threat, Perceived Efficacy, and Behavioral Intention in the Extended Parallel Process Model.” Health Communication 31 (3): 275–286. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.948145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzman, T. 2011. “A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Instructional Effectiveness of Computer-Based Simulation Games.” Personality Psychology 64: 489–538.
   Google Scholar
• Smalle, E., M. Page, W. Duyck, M. Edwards, and A. Szmalec. 2016. “Evidence for the Less-is-More Hypothesis in Language Acquisition Using the Hebb Repetition Paradigm.” 8th Europeanworking Memory Symposium Luik.” Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Huurne, E. F. J. 2008. “Information Seeking in a Risky World. The Theoretical and Empirical Development of FRIS: A Framework of Risk Information Seeking.” Dissertation., Enschede: University of Twente, 174 p.
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra, T., and J. M. Gutteling. 2008. “Households’ Perceived Responsibilities in Flood Risk Management in The Netherlands.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 24 (4): 555–565. doi:10.1080/07900620801923385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verroen, S., J. M. Gutteling, and P. W. de Vries. 2013. “Enhancing Self‐Protective Behavior: Efficacy Beliefs and Peer Feedback in Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 33 (7): 1252–1264. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01924.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieweg, S., A. N. Hughes, K. Starbird, and L. Palen. 2010. “Microblogging during Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awarenes.” In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Proceedings, Vol. 2, 1079–1988. Atlanta, GA. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753486.
   Google Scholar
• Visscher, V. H. M., R. M. Meertens, W. W. F. Passchier, and N. N. K. de Vries. 2009. “Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of Research Literature.” Risk Analysis 29 (2): 267–287. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. 1992. “Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model.” Communication Monographs 59 (4): 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., and M. Allen. 2000. “A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns.” Health Education & Behavior 27 (5): 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (2): 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 2001. “Mere Expose: A Gateway to the Subliminal.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (6): 224–228. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar