The roles of news media as democratic fora, agenda setters, and strategic instruments in risk governance

References

• Aalberg, T., and J. Curran. 2012. How Media Inform Democracy. A Comparative Approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., and R. P. Snow. 1979. Media Logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, V. 2010. “Media and Risk: Old and New Research Directions.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (1): 5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903135953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. 2009. News. The Politics of Illusion. 8th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A. R., M. A. Cacciatore, D. A. Scheufele, and D. Brossard. 2014. “The Role of News Media in the Social Amplification of Risk.” The SAGE Handbook of Risk Communication, edited by H. Cho, T. Reimer, and K. A. McComas, 69–85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. 2017. “The Second Earthquake: How the Italian State Generated Hope and Uncertainty in Post‐Disaster L’Aquila.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (1): 61–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, W. J., P. Slovic, R. E. Kasperson, J. X. Kasperson, O. Renn, and S. Emani. 1993. “Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk – Implications for the Theory Construction and Decision-Making.” Risk Analysis 13 (6): 611–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01323.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, J. S., and D. Duckett. 2012. “Social Amplification as a Social Attribution: The Case of Zoonotic Disease Outbreak.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (9): 1049–1074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.670130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, J. S., and S. Onggo. 2013. “Managing the Social Amplification of Risk: A Simulation of Interacting Actors.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 64 (5): 638–653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S., and K. Neuwirth. 1991. “Coming to Terms with the Impact of Communication on Scientific and Technological Risk Judgments.” In Risky Business: Communicating Issues of Science, Risk, and Public Policy, edited by L. Wilkins and P. Patterson, 11–30. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, C. D., and R. W. Cobb. 1983. The Political Uses of Symbols. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fjaeran, L., and T. Aven. 2019. “Making Visible the Less Visible – How the Use of an Uncertainty-Based Risk Perspective Affects Risk Attenuation and Risk Amplification.” Journal of Risk Research 22: 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1687579.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, S., O. Adegbola, and J. Huemmer. 2019. “Where’s the Fracking Bias? Contested Media Frames and News Reporting on Shale Gas in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science 51: 168–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S. 2013. The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, A. 2013. “The Weakest Link in Existing Studies: Media–Government Risk Interactions.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.713387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., and A. Simon. 1993. “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing.” Communication Research 20 (3): 365–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor, L. A., W. Wang, H. Olson, X. Li, and A. B. Markman. 2019. “Public Perceptions and Information Seeking Intentions Related to Seismicity in Five Texas Communities.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 37: 101147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 177–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M. 2007. “Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2): 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M., and J. Habermeier. 1995. “The Impact of Key Events on the Presentation of Reality.” European Journal of Communication 10 (3): 371–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323195010003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2019. “The Coming of Age of Risk Governance.” Risk Analysis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korthagen, I. 2015. “Media Logic Versus the Logic of Network Governance.” PhD diss., Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E., and O. Renn. 1997. “The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong.” Risk Analysis 17 (2): 131–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00852.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. “Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A., H. Lu, K. M. Keranen, M. A. Furtney, and H. Song. 2016. “Public Perceptions and Acceptance of Induced Earthquakes Related to Energy Development.” Energy Policy 99: 27–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E. 2004. Setting the Agenda. The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2014. “Watchdog Journalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by M. A. P. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 525–544. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opperhuizen, A. E., E. H. Klijn, and K. Schouten. 2019b. “How Do Media, Political and Regulatory Agendas Influence One Another in High Risk Policy Issues?” Policy & Politics 20 (5): 714–734.
   Google Scholar
• Opperhuizen, A. E., K. Schouten, and E. H. Klijn. 2019a. “Framing a Conflict! How Media Report on Earthquake Risks Caused by Gas Drilling: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Machine Learning Techniques of Media Reporting on Gas Drilling from 1990 to 2015.” Journalism Studies 20 (5): 714–734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1418672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poumadère, M., and C. Mays. 2003. “The Dynamics of Risk Amplification and Attenuation in Context: A French Case Study.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson and P. Slovic, 209–242. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461.010
   Google Scholar
• Poumadère, M., C. Mays, S. Le Mer, and R. Blong. 2005. “The Heat Wave in France: Dangerous Climate Change Here and Now.” Risk Analysis 25 (6): 1483–1494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00694.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. 1988. “Muddling through Metaphors to Maturity: A Commentary on Kasperson et al., ‘the Social Amplification of Risk.” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 201–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01172.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. Routledge, NY: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1988. “Should Social Amplification of Risk Be Counteracted?” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 193–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01170.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and D. Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 2008. Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., and F. Esser. 2009. “Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism.” In Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, edited by K. Lundby, 205–224. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., and S. Walgrave. 2011. “Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media according to Different Methods.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (3): 295–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211406727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voort, N., and F. Vanclay. 2015. “Social Impacts of Earthquakes Caused by Gas Extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50: 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasterman, P. 2018. From Media Hype to Twitter Storm: News Explosions and Their Impact on Issues, Crises, and Public Opinion. Amsterdam: Academic University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, E., M. van Asselt, T. Fox, and A. Hommels. 2010. “The EU Seveso Regime in Practice: From Uncertainy Blindness to Uncertainty Tolerance.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 184 (1–3): 627–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlek, C. 2018. “Induced Earthquakes from Long‐Term Gas Extraction in Groningen, The Netherlands: Statistical Analysis and Prognosis for Acceptable‐Risk Regulation.” Risk Analysis 38 (7): 1455–1473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., R. Whittle, W. Medd, and N. Watson. 2010. Risk Governance and Natural Hazards. CapHaz-Net WP2 Report. Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre. http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net_WP2_Risk-Governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, J. K., and R. Löfstedt. 2018. “Anticipating or Accommodating to Public Concern? Risk Amplification and the Politics of Precaution Reexamined.” Risk Analysis 38 (9): 1802–1819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar