Electromagnetic field exposure in power plants: a qualitative assessment of work safety perceptions among employees

References

• Ahlbom, A., N. Day, M. Feychting, E. Roman, J. Skinner, J. Dockerty, M. Linet, et al. 2000. “A Pooled Analysis of Magnetic Fields and Childhood Leukemia.” British Journal of Cancer 83 (5): 692–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanko, T., H. Lindholm, S. Jungewelter, M. Tiikkaja, and M. Hietanen. 2014. Operating Model for Managing Accidental Overexposure to RF-Fields. Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
   Google Scholar
• Baliatsas, C., J. Bolte, J. Yzermans, G. Kelfkens, M. Hooiveld, E. Lebret, and I. van Kamp. 2015. “Actual and Perceived Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Non-Specific Physical Symptoms: An Epidemiological Study Based on Self-Reported Data and Electronic Medical Records.” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 218 (3): 331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolte, J. F. B., C. Baliatsas, T. Eikelboom, and I. van Kamp. 2015. “Everyday Exposure to Power Frequency Magnetic Fields and Associations with Non-Specific Physical Symptoms.” Environmental Pollution 196: 224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cezar-Vaz, M. R., C. A. Bonow, and J. C. Cezar-Vaz. 2015. “Risk Communication concerning Welding Fumes for the Primary Preventive Care of Welding Apprentices in Southern Brazil.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (1): 986–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Special Eurobarometer: Electromagnetic Fields. Belgium: TNS Opinion & Social.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Non-Binding Guide to Good Practice for Implementing Directive 2013/35/EU: Electromagnetic Fields. Volume 1: Practical Guide. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough?: an Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18 (1): 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambach, R., P. Mairiaux, G. François, L. Braeckman, A. Balsat, G. Van Hal, C. Vandoorne, et al. 2011. “Workers’ Perception of Chemical Risks: A Focus Group Study.” Risk Analysis 31 (2): 335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health & Safety Executive. 2016. Electromagnetic fields at work. A guide to the Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work: Regulations 2016. Accessed July 20, 2017. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg281.htm
   Google Scholar
• Huss, A., T. Koeman, H. Kromhout, and R. Vermeulen. 2015. “Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure and Parkinson’s Disease—a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Data.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (7): 7348–7356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). 2010. “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric and Magnetic Fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz).” Health Physics 99 (6): 818–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz, J., and K. Gryz. 2007. “Practical Aspects of Occupational EMF Exposure Assessment.” The Environmentalist 27 (4): 525–531.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., L. Kheifets, M. Repacholi, J. Sahl, E. Van Deventer, and E. Vogel. 2002. Establishing a Dialogue on Risks from Electromagnetic Fields. Canada: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Kheifets, L., A. A. Afifi, and R. Shimkhada. 2006. “Public Health Impact of Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields.” Environmental Health Perspectives 114 (10): 1532–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, K. A., and J. Volckens. 2011. “Prospects and Pitfalls of Occupational Hazard Mapping: ‘between These Lines There Be Dragons.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 55 (8): 829–840. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J. M., and M. J. Morse. 2015. “Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews.” Global Qualitative Nursing Research 2: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mols, F., S. A. Haslam, J. Jetten, and N. K. Steffens. 2015. “Why a Nudge is Not Enough: A Social Identity Critique of Governance by Stealth.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (1): 81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewöhner, J., P. Cox, S. Gerrard, and N. Pidgeon. 2004. “Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mental Models Approach for Improving Occupational Chemical Risk Protection.” Risk Analysis 24 (2): 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J., S. McAlpine, J. Homan, S. Sadhra, H. Pattison, and S. MacRae. 2002. Development of a Methodology to Design and Evaluate Effective Risk Messages; Electroplating Case Study. UK: University of Birmingham/Health & Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Sheyn, D. D., J. M. Racadio, J. Ying, M. N. Patel, J. M. Racadio, and N. D. Johnson. 2008. “Efficacy of a Radiation Safety Education Initiative in Reducing Radiation Exposure in the Pediatric IR Suite.” Pediatric Radiology 38 (6): 669–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, R. 2014. “The Revised Electromagnetic Fields Directive and Worker Exposure in Environments with High Magnetic Flux Densities.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 58 (5): 529–541. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meu010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stege, T. A. M., J. F. B. Bolte, L. Claassen, and D. R. M. Timmermans. 2019. “Particulate Matter Exposure in Roadwork Companies: A Mental Models Study on Work Safety.” Safety Science 120: 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar