Grasping the nettle? Considering the contemporary challenges of risk assessment

References

• Allen, B., and D. Reser. 1990. “Content analysis in library and information science research.” Library and Information Science Research 12 (3): 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., M. L. Cropper, G. C. Eads, R. W. Hahn, L. B. Lave, R. G. Noll, P. R. Portney, et al. 1996. “Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?” Science (New York, N.Y.) 272 (5259): 221–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5259.221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., M. Cave, and M. Lodge. 2012. Understanding Regulation: theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Beroggi, G. E. G., and W. A. Waliace. 2000. “Multi-Expert Operational Risk Management.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 30 (1): 32–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.827452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., D. H. Greenberg, A. R. Vining, and D. L. Weimer. 2017. Cost-Benefit Analysis: concepts and Practice 4th ed., 558p. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., and B. Fisse. 1988. Accountability and the Control of Corporate Crime. Understanding Crime and Criminal Justice. Sydney: Law Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Breyer, S. 2009. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., and S. P. Osborne. 2013. “Risk and Innovation, towards a Framework for Risk Governance in Public Services.” Public Management Review 15 (2): 186–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.707681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. 2009. “A Sequential Mixed Model Research Design: Design, Analytical and Display Issues.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 3 (2): 140–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.3.2.140.
   Google Scholar
• Clemen, R. T., and R. L. Winkler. 1999. “Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis.” Risk Analysis 19 (2): 187–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, R. M. 1991. Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curristine, T., Z. Lonti, and I. Joumard. 2007. “Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 7 (1): 1–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v7-art6-en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. 2014. “Guidance on Expert Knowledge Elicitation in Food and Feed Safety Risk Assessment.” EFSA Journal 12 (6): 3734.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H. D. 2012. “Disaster Planning: The Preservation of Life and Property.” Springer Science & Business Media 15 (2): 226–243.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., and T. R. LaPorte. 2002. “Airport Security, High Reliability, and the Problem of Rationality.” Public Administration Review 62 (s1): 33–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Gorz, A. 2010. “Critique of Economic Reason.” Verso Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, F. 2013. “Three Risks, One Solution? Exploring the Relationship between Risk and Regulation.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 649 (1): 35–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213490884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, B., and P. Brown. 2013. “Perspectives on the Lens of Risk Interview Series: interviews with Tom Horlick-Jones, Paul Slovic and Andy Alaszewski.” Health, Risk and Society 15 (6-07): 494–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.830698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, V. 2006. “Guidance without Constraint: Assessing the Impact of the Precautionary Principle on the European Community’s Chemicals Policy.” Yearbook of European Environmental Law 6: 27–60.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. London: Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 235 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N., J. W. Creswell, and S. Stick. 2006. “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice.” Field Methods 18 (1): 3–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8 (2): 177–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman, M. T. 1988. “Pollution Liability Insurance and Catastrophic Environmental Risk.” The Journal of Risk and Insurance 55 (1): 75–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/253282.
   Google Scholar
• Khodadadyan, A., G. Mythen, H. Assa, and B. Bishop. 2018. “Tools and Techniques in Risk Assessment in Public Risk Management Organisations.” International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 12 (10): 1277–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., and D. Easterling. 1990. “Are Risk-Benefit Trade-Offs Possible in Siting Hazardous Facilities?” American Economic Review 80 (2): 252–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. W., and C. Cheng. 2009. “The Reliability of Aggregated Probability Judgments Obtained through Cooke's Classical Model.” Journal of Modelling in Management 4 (2): 149–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660910973961.
   Google Scholar
• Linkov, I., S. Larkin, and J. H. Lambert. 2015. “Concepts and Approaches to Resilience in a Variety of Governance and Regulatory Domains.”
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Bostock, S. M., and B. M. Hutter. 2008. “Reforming Regulation of the Medical Profession: The Risks of Risk-Based Approaches.” Health, Risk and Society 10 (1): 69–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570701782460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E., and J. K. Wardman. 2016. “State of the Art Transparency: Lessons from Europe and North America.” Journal of Risk Research 19 (9): 1079–1081. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1249713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 2002. “The Precautionary Principle and Its Policy Implications.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1): 89–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. 2018. “Thinking with Ulrich Beck: Security, Terrorism and Transformation.” Special Edition: Journal of Risk Research 21 (1): 17–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1362028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., and J. Wardman. 2016. “Communicating Risk under High Uncertainty: Developing Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge.” Journal of Risk Research 19 (10): 1217–1219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1261996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: managing the Progress. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, R. G., and J. E. Krier. 1990. “Some Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Risk Regulation.” The Journal of Legal Studies 19 (S2): 747–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/467870.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, M. E., K. M. Carley, and T. A. Dale. 1997. “Applications of Computer-Aided Text Analysis: Analyzing Literary and Nonliterary Texts.” In Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Tanscripts, 1st Edition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., M. Huber, and G. Gaskell. 2006. “A Theory of Risk Colonization: The Spiralling Regulatory Logics of Societal and Institutional Risk.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 91–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2009. Research Methods for Business Students. 5th ed. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 2010. The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception. Routledge: Earthscan, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 24 (2): 311–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar, D. 2020. “Britain Had a Head Start on Covid-19, but Our Leaders Squandered It.” The Guardian 23 March.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2002. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, J., and L. Levidow. 1992. “Proactive and Reactive Approaches to Risk Regulation: The Case of Biotechnology.” Futures 24 (3): 219–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(92)90032-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. L., and E. A. Yetley. 2008. “Nutrient Risk Assessment as a Tool for Providing Scientific Assessments to Regulators.” The Journal of Nutrition 138 (10): 1987S–1991S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.10.1987S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. A., and N. F. Pidgeon. 1997. Man-Made Disasters. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K., and J. T. Hamilton. 1999. “Are Risk Regulators Rational? Evidence from Hazardous Waste Clean-up Decisions.” American Economic Review 89 (4): 1010–1027. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, J. K., and G. Mythen. 2016. “Risk Communication: Against the Gods or against All Odds? Problems and Prospects of Accounting for Black Swans.” Journal of Risk Research 19 (10): 1220–1230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1262002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. 1985. “Trial without Error: Anticipation vs Resilience as Strategies for Risk Reduction.” Centre for Independent Studies 13: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. 1988. “Searching for Safety.” Transaction Publishers 10.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. S., G. Apostolakis, and D. Okrent. 1990. “Uncertainties in System Analysis: Probabilistic versus Non-Probabilistic Theories.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 30 (1-3): 163–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(90)90093-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar