The utility of social practice theory in risk research

References

• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1977. “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research.” Psychological Bulletin 84 (5): 888–918. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1992. “The de-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. E. Bijker & J. Law, 205–224. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaszewski, A., and K. Coxon. 2008. “The Everyday Experience of Living with Risk and Uncertainty.” Health, Risk & Society 10 (5): 413–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802383952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. B. 2008. Risici og ramthed. Vedtagelser, performance og definitionsmagt. Et studie af kommunikationsprocesser mellem myndigheder, borgere og medier i forbindelse med ulykken på N.P. Johnsens Fyrvaerkerifabrik i Kolding i 2004 samt orkan og højvandsvarslet i Skive i 2005. Roskilde.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2010. “Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism.” Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., B. Brenna, and I. Moser. 2001. Teknovitenskapelige Kulturer [Techno Scientific Cultures]. Oslo: Spartacus.
   Google Scholar
• Bagguley, P. 2003. “Reflexivity Contra Structuration.” Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 28 (2): 133–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3341456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benadusi, M. 2014. “Pedagogies of the Unknown: Unpacking ‘Culture’in Disaster Risk Reduction Education.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22 (3): 174–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, T. T., and S. Ravn. 2018. Youth, Risk, Routine: A New Perspective on Risk-Taking in Young Lives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S., E. Shove, C. Carmona, and M. P. Kelly. 2016. “Theories of Practice and Public Health: understanding (un) Healthy Practices.” Critical Public Health 26 (1): 36–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.980396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å., H. Corvellec, and M. Karlsson. 2012. “The Practice of Risk Governance: lessons from the Field.” Journal of Risk Research 15 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.587886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2013 [1984]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. 2016. “From Rationalities to Lifeworlds: Analysing the Everyday Handling of Uncertainty and Risk in Terms of Culture, Society and Identity.” Health, Risk & Society 18 (7–8): 335–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1271866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. 2017. “I’m Gonna Do This over and over and over Forever!’: Overlapping Fields and Climbing Practice.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 52 (5): 584–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215609785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K., T. R. Schatzki, and E. Von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H. 2009. “The Practice of Risk Management: Silence is Not Absence.” Risk Management 11 (3–4): 285–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.12.
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, P., and R. Bunton. 2009. “Logics of Practice in the ‘Risk Environment’.” Health, Risk & Society 11 (3): 269–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570902906447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, E. 2016. “Following Routines: A Challenge in Cross‐Sectorial Collaboration.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 24 (1): 36–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. 2012. “Reviewing the Critique of Individualization:The Disembedded and Embedded Theses.” Acta Sociologica 55 (4): 305–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699312447634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 2002. Risk and Blame. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. 2011. “Practice-Ing Behaviour Change: Applying Social Practice Theory to Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change.” Journal of Consumer Culture 11 (1): 79–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, S. 2004. “A ‘Post‐Foundational’interpretation of Risk: Risk as ‘Performance.” Journal of Risk Research 7 (3): 277–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000176235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebrok, M., and N. Heidenstrøm. 2019. “Contextualising Food Waste Prevention. Decisive Moments within Everyday Practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production 210: 1435–1448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenstrøm, N. 2020. “Preapredness in Everyday Life: A Social Practice Perspective.” PhD diss., University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenstrøm, N., and L. Kvarnlöf. 2017. “Coping with Blackouts. A Practice Theory Approach to Household Preparedness.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26 (2): 272–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenstrøm, N., and A. Rhiger Hansen. 2020. “Embodied Competences in Household Preparedness: A Mixed Methods Research.” Energy Research & Social Science 66: 101498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenstrøm, N., and H. Throne-Holst. 2020. “‘Someone Will Take Care of It.’ Households’ Understanding of Their Responsibility to Prepare for and Cope with Electricity and ICT Infrastructure Breakdowns.” Energy Policy 144:111676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennell, K. 2017. A Proper Night Out': Alcohol and Risk among Young People in Deprived Areas in North West England. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., N. Pidgeon, S. Sarre, P. Simmons, and N. Smith. 2008. “Risk, Framing and Everyday Life: Epistemological and Methodological Reflections from Three Socio-Cultural Projects.” Health, Risk & Society 10 (5): 421–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802381451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. 2005. “On ‘Risk Work’: Professional Discourse, Accountability, and Everyday Action.” Health, Risk & Society 7 (3): 293–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570500229820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., and A. Prades. 2009. “On Interpretative Risk Perception Research: Some Reflections on Its Origins; Its Nature; and Its Possible Applications in Risk Communication Practice.” Health, Risk & Society 11 (5): 409–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903180448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, and J. Kitzinger. 2007. “Bricolage in Action: learning about, Making Sense of, and Discussing, Issues about Genetically Modified Crops and Food.” Health, Risk & Society 9 (1): 83–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570601181623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick‐Jones. T. 2005. “Informal Logics of Risk: Contingency and Modes of Practical Reasoning.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (3): 253–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000270735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, E. 2013. Dangerous Liaisons. Domestic Food Safety Practices. Oslo: Centre of technology, Innovation and Culture. Faculty of Social Sciences. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1998. “The Political Science of Risk Perception.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 91–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00129-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1999. “The Songlines of Risk.” Environmental Values 8 (2): 135–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327199129341761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. 1999. “Bounded Rationality.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 297–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. 2009. “Is a “Special Psychology” of Practice Possible? From Values and Attitudes to Embodied Dispositions.” Theory & Psychology 19 (6): 713–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309345891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2013. Risk. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyng, S. 2004. Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C. J., and Y. Strengers. 2011. “Housing, Heat Stress and Health in a Changing Climate: promoting the Adaptive Capacity of Vulnerable Households, a Suggested Way Forward.” Health Promotion International 26 (4): 492–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, C. 2012. “Using Social Practice Theory to Understand Everyday Life in a Master-Planned Estate: outcomes for Health and Wellbeing.” Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Sociological Association: Emerging and Enduring Inequalities.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, P. S., A. Warde, and J. Holmes. 2018. “All Drinking is Not Equal: how a Social Practice Theory Lens Could Enhance Public Health Research on Alcohol and Other Health Behaviours.” Addiction 113 (2): 206–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Mahn, D., J. Everts, and C. Stephan. 2018. “Riskscapes revisited-Exploring the Relationship between Risk, Space and Practice.” Erdkunde 72 (3): 197–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2018.02.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2017. “Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary: Affordances and Limitations.” In Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, edited by M. Jonas, B. Littig, & A. Wroblewski, 19–34. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• November, V. 2008. “Spatiality of Risk.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (7): 1523–1527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a4194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, K. G., S. Öhman, and A. Olofsson. 2015. “Doing and Undoing Risk: The Mutual Constitution of Risk and Heteronormativity in Contemporary Society.” Journal of Risk Research 20 (3): 418–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1088056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, K. G., A. Olofsson, and S. Öhman. 2019. A Framework of Intersectional Risk Theory in the Age of Ambivalence. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., and J. O. Zinn. 2018. Researching Risk and Uncertainty. Methodologies, Methods and Research Strategies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., J. O. Zinn, G. Griffin, K. G. Nygren, A. Cebulla, and K. Hannah-Moffat. 2014. “The Mutual Constitution of Risk and Inequalities: Intersectional Risk Theory.” Health, Risk & Society 16 (5): 417–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2014.942258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P. 2009. “Governmentality and Risk.” In Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction, edited by J. O. Zinn, 52–75. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P. 2013. “Uncertain Governance and Resilient Subjects in the Risk Society.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3 (2):16.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. B. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500010811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, O., and E. Danielsson. 2018. “Unrecognized Crisis Management—Normalizing Everyday Work: The Work Practice of Crisis Management in a Refugee Situation.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26 (2): 225–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K. A., N. F. Pidgeon, K. L. Henwood, P. Simmons, and D. Venables. 2010. “From the Familiar to the Extraordinary: local Residents’ Perceptions of Risk When Living with Nuclear Power in the UK.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1): 39–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postill, J. 2010. “Introduction.” In Theorising Media and Practice, edited by B. Bräuchler & J. Postill, Vol. 4, 1–32. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002a. “The Status of the “Material” in Theories of Culture: From “Social Structure” to “Artefacts.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (2): 195–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002b. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, G. 2004. “Uncertain Times: The Notion of ‘Risk’and the Development of Modernity.” Time & Society 13 (2–3): 383–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X04045672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. 2009. “Theories of Practice—New Inspiration for Ecological Economic Studies on Consumption.” Ecological Economics 68 (10): 2490–2497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 1997. “Practices and Actions: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3): 283–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319702700301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, and E. Savigny, 10–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlačko, M. 2017. “Conducting Ethnography with a Sensibility for Practice.” In Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, edited by M. Jonas, B. Littig, & A. Wroblewski, 47–60. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2009. “Everyday Practice and the Production and Consumption of Time.” In Time, Consumption, and Everyday Life. Practice, Materiality and Culture, edited by E. Shove, F. Trentmann, and G. Walker, 17–33. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. “Beyond the ABC: climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (6): 1273–1285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Silvast, A. 2017. Making Electricity Resilient: Risk and Security in a Liberalized Infrastructure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 236 (4799): 280–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerton, D. 2013. “Habits, Routines and Temporalities of Consumption: From Individual Behaviours to the Reproduction of Everyday Practices.” Time & Society 22 (3): 335–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X12464228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurling, N. J., A. McMeekin, D. Southerton, E. Shove, and D. Welch. 2013. “Interventions in practice: reframing policy approaches to consumer behaviour.” http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/sprg-report-sept-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y., and C. Maller. 2014. Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: Beyond Behaviour Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tharaldsen, J. E., and K. Haukelid. 2009. “Culture and Behavioural Perspectives on Safety–towards a Balanced Approach.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (3–4): 375–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870902757252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J., and D. Lupton. 2003. Risk and Everyday Life. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Tuin, I., and R. Dolphijn. 2010. “The Transversality of New Materialism.” Women: a Cultural Review 21 (2): 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2014. “The Dynamics of Energy Demand: Change, Rhythm and Synchronicity.” Energy Research & Social Science 1: 49–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2005. “Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2014. “After Taste: Culture, Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (3): 279–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514547828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2016a. Consumption: A Sociological Analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2016b. The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. 2017. “Placing Power in Practice Theory.” In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki, E. Shove, 169–182. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, I., and B. Wynne. 2013. “Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats.” Science as Culture 22 (4): 540–566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.764072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford, J. 2002. “Pragmatism and the Untenable Dualism of Means and Ends: Why Rational Choice Theory Does Not Deserve Paradigmatic Privilege.” Theory and Society 31 (3): 325–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016232404279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, W. J., A. Meah, A. M. Dickinson, and F. Short. 2015. “I Don’t Think I Ever Had Food Poisoning’. A Practice-Based Approach to Understanding Foodborne Disease That Originates in the Home.” Appetite 85: 118–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2008. “Heading into the Unknown: Everyday Strategies for Managing Risk and Uncertainty.” Health, Risk & Society 10 (5): 439–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802380891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2015. “Towards a Better Understanding of Risk-Taking: Key Concepts, Dimensions and Perspectives.” Health, Risk & Society 17 (2): 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2016. “‘In-between’ and other reasonable ways to deal with risk and uncertainty: A review article.” Health, Risk & Society 18 (7–8): 348–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1269879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2019. “The Meaning of Risk-Taking–Key Concepts and Dimensions.” Journal of Risk Research 22 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2020. Understanding Risk-Taking. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar