The emergence of mistrustful civic vigilance in Finnish, French, German and Spanish nuclear policies: ideological trust and (de)politicization

References

• Allard, O., M. Carey, and R. Renault. 2016. “De L’art de se Méfier [the Art of Mistrust].” Tracés 31 (2): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Arlt, D., and J. Wolling. 2016. “Fukushima Effects in Germany? Changes in Media Coverage and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 25 (7): 842–857. doi:10.1177/0963662515589276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustine, D. 2018. Taking on Technocracy: Nuclear Power in Germany, 1945 to the Present (Protest, Culture & Society 24). New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Brouard, S., and I. Guinaudeau. 2015. “Policy beyond Politics? Public Opinion, Party Politics and the French Pro-Nuclear Energy Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 35 (1): 137–170. doi:10.1017/S0143814X14000221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho Palencia, A. 2018. “El movimiento antinuclear en España 1977–1990.”Ecologistas en Acción.https://www.ecologistasenaccion.org/16239/el-movimiento-antinuclear-en-espana-1977-1990/
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F., and J. Debaz. 2017. Aux bords de l’irreversible: Sociologie pragmatique des transformations. Paris: Editions PETRA.
   Google Scholar
• Cobos, E., and M. J. Recoder. 2019. “La imagen de la energía nuclear en la prensa española de proximidad: ¿Son los medios de comunicación un stakeholder relevante para el sector atómico?” Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura (61): 31–53. (December): doi:10.5565/rev/analisi.3181.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Morata, P. 2001. Nuclearizar España. Reedición 25 Aniversario (1976–2001). Madrid: Troya Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., and G. Rowe, eds. 2019. Backcasting Futures for Nuclear Energy and Society: A Qualitative Analysis of European Stakeholder Perspectives. HoNESt project deliverable D5.3.
   Google Scholar
• CSN (Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear). 2015. Estudio demoscópico correspondiente a la cuarta recomendación. Madrid: CSN. https://www.csn.es/documents/10182/1008558/Estudio%20demosc%C3%B3pico%20correspondiente%20a%20la%20cuarta%20recomendaci%C3%B3n.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, J., and M. Rubio-Varas. 2017. “¿España nuclearizada? Origen, desarrollo y actores de la energía electronuclear, c. 1955-1985.” In La Electricidad y el Territorio. Historia y Futuro, edited by M. H. Zaar, P. Vasconcelos, M. Junior, and H. Capel. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona/Geocrítica. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6962255
   Google Scholar
• d’Iribarne, P. 2005. “Les Français et les déchets nucléaires. Rapport au Ministre délégué à l’industrie.” La Documentation française. https://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/054000355.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T. E., and M. Siegrist. 2006. “Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction between Trust and Confidence.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36 (2): 383–416. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espluga, J., B. Medina, and W. Konrad, eds. 2018. Case Studies Reports: In-Depth Understanding of the Mechanisms for Effective Interaction with Civil Society. HoNESt project deliverable D3.4. http://honest2020.eu/deliverables. PID: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68596-8
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Commission (Ethics Commission for a Safe Energy Supply). 2011. Germany’s Energy Transition – A Collective Project for the Future. Berlin. https://archiv.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/656922/457334/784356871e5375b8bd74ba2a0bde22bf/2011-05-30-abschlussbericht-ethikkommission-en-data.pdf?download=1
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. 2010. Europeans and Nuclear Safety. Special Eurobarometer 324. Brussels: European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S769_72_2_EBS324.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2018. Supplementary Analysis – Societal Change and Trust in Institutions. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2018/societal-change-and-trust-in-institutions#tab-03
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Energy. 2019. “Suomalaisten Energia-asenteet 2019 [Energy Attitudes of the Finns 2019].” https://energia.fi/files/4313/Energiateollisuus_-_Energia-asenteet_2019.pdf"
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2002. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Halme, M., J. I. Hukkinen, J. Korppi-Tommola, L. Linnanen, M. Liski, R. Lovio, P. Lund, et al. 2015. Maamme energia. Helsinki: Into Kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Haukkala, T. 2018. “A Struggle for Change – the Formation of a Green-Transition Advocacy Coalition in Finland.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27: 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2009. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helmbold, B. 2018. German Democratic Republic: Short Country Report. HoNESt project deliverable D3.6. https://academica-e.unavarra.es/xmlui/handle/2454/38269
   Google Scholar
• IRSN. 2020. Baromètre IRSN. Baromètre IRSN: La perception des risques et de la sécurité par les Français. Fontenay-aux-Roses: Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquiot, P. 2007. “Comparaison des processus de formation et de diffusion du mouvement écologiste en RFA et en France.” Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 123 (2): 217–244. doi:10.3917/cis.123.0217.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A., M. Lehtonen, J.-H. Meyer, and M. Rubio-Varas, eds. 2021. Engaging the Atom: The History of Nuclear Energy and Society in Europe from the 1950s to the Present. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleva. 2019. “Koruton kuva Hanhikivestä – kansalaiset tunnistavat Rosatomin taakse kätkeytyvät motiivit” [Bleak Picture of Hanhikivi – Citizens Recognise the Hidden Motifs of Rosatom]. https://www.kaleva.fi/koruton-kuva-hanhikivesta-kansalaiset-tunnistavat/1716032?fbclid=IwAR09WedZZdkySWSWM8RiLLTEfrgvcoI0rsKJZQfwdBKg00q_VxLhy7gj0EQ
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg, L. A. 2010. “Därför går kärnkraften bättre i Finland.” [That’s Why Nuclear Power Works Better in Finland]. Ny Teknik. https://www.nyteknik.se/energi/darfor-gar-karnkraften-battre-i-finland-6423824
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., M. Kari, T. Litmanen, T. Vilhunen, and M. Lehtonen. 2020. “The critical Swedes and the consensual Finns: Leading newspapers as watchdogs or lapdogs of nuclear waste repository licensing?.” Energy Research & Social Science 61: 101354. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. 2016. “A Question of Confidence: Nuclear Waste and Public Trust in the United States after Fukushima.” Chap. 12 in The Fukushima Effect: A New Geopolitical Terrain, edited by R. Hindmarsh and R. Priestly, 223–246. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, A., and H. Trischler. 2018. Federal Republic of Germany: Short Country Report. HoNESt project deliverable D3.6. https://academica-e.unavarra.es/xmlui/handle/2454/38269.
   Google Scholar
• Lammi, H. 2009. “Social Dynamics behind the Changes in the NGOs anti-Nuclear Campaign, 1993–2002.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power Policy in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 69–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. 2009. “Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 369–391. doi:10.1080/14649350903229810.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., and L. de Carlo. 2019. “Community Energy and the Virtues of Mistrust and Distrust: Lessons from Brighton and Hove Energy Cooperatives.” Ecological Economics 164 (October): 106367. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, T. Jartti, T. Litmanen, and M. Kari. 2020. “The Roles of the State and Social Licence to Operate? Lessons from Nuclear Waste Management in Finland, France, and Sweden.” Energy Research & Social Science 61 (March): 101353. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., Kojo, M. M. Kari, and T. Litmanen. 2021. “Healthy Mistrust or Complacent Confidence? Civic Vigilance in the Reporting by Leading Newspapers on Nuclear Waste Disposal in Finland and France.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 12 (2): 130–157. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. 2019. France Short Country Report (version 2019). HoNESt project deliverable D3.6. https://hdl.handle.net/2454/38269
   Google Scholar
• Lepage, C. 2014. L’Etat nucléaire. Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W. 1998. “Iterative Triangulation: A Theory Development Process Using Existing Case Studies.” Journal of Operations Management 16 (4): 455–469. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00024-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. J., and A. Weigert. 1985. “Trust as Social Reality.” Social Forces 63 (4): 967–985. doi:10.2307/2578601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T. 2009. “The Temporary Nature of Societal Risk Evaluation: Understanding the Finnish Nuclear Decisions.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 192–217. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. 1988. “A Technocratic Vision: The Ideology of School Science Reform in Britain in the 1950s.” Social Studies of Science 18 (4): 703–724. doi:10.1177/030631288018004005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., and S. Hesse-Biber. 2012. “Triangulation and Mixed Methods Research: Provocative Positions.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (2): 75–79. doi:10.1177/1558689812437100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen, K.-E., and A. Harjula. 2018. Finland Short Country Report (Version 2018). HoNESt project deliverable D3.6. https://hdl.handle.net/2454/38269
   Google Scholar
• Milder, S. 2017. Greening Democracy: The Anti-Nuclear Movement and Political Environmentalism in West Germany and Beyond, 1968–1983. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2017. “The Conceptual Framework of Political Support.” In Handbook on Political Trust, edited by Sonja Zmerli and Tom van der Meer, 19–32. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• North, O. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD-NEA. 2003. The Regulator’s Evolving Role and Image in Radioactive Waste Management: Lessons Learnt within the NEA Forum on Stakeholder Confidence. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/reports/2003/nea4428-regulator-role.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Öko-Institut. 1977. Erklärung zur Gründung des Instituts. Wiedenfelsen. https://40.oeko.de/wp-content/uploads/Timeline/Andere_Archivdokumente/OeI_1977_Gruendungserklaerung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oltra, C., R. Sala, S. Germán, and S. López-Asensio. 2019. “Trust Perceptions among Residents Surrounding Nuclear Power Plants: A Descriptive and Explanatory Study.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 113: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palazuelos, E. 2019. El oligopolio que domina el Sistema eléctrico. Madrid: Akal.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, A. C. 2020. “Nucléaire: la Cour des comptes révise à la hausse la facture réelle de l’EPR.” Libération, July 9. https://www.liberation.fr/france/2020/07/09/nucleaire-la-cour-des-comptes-revise-a-la-hausse-la-facture-reelle-de-l-epr_1793843
   Google Scholar
• Radkau, J. 2011. “Eine kurze Geschichte der deutschen Antiatombewegung.” Ende des Atomzeitalters? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) 61 (46–47): 715.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, T. 2007. “What Could Have Been Done? Reflections on the Radwaste-Battle, as Seen from below.” In Communication Presented at the European Nuclear Critical Conference 2007, Helsinki, November 9–11. http://uraanitieto.tormunet.fi/uraanitieto/encc/rosenberg.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio-Varas, M., Torre J. De la, J. Espluga, and A. Presas. 2018. Spain: Short Country Report. HoNESt project deliverable D3.6. https://academica-e.unavarra.es/xmlui/handle/2454/38269.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2020. “Rediscovering a Risky Ideology: Technocracy and Its Effects on Technology Governance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 112–116. (suppdoi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1816345.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2007. “Democratic ‘Misfit’? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union.” Political Studies 55 (2): 384–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, P. 1999. “Values, Ideology and Politics in Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 28 (2): 161–170. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00139-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., and S. V. Valentine. 2012. The National Politics of Nuclear Power: Economics, Security, and Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steentjes, K., N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, A. Corner, A. Arnold, G. Böhm, C. Mays, et al. 2017. European Perceptions of Climate Change: Topline Findings of a Survey Conducted in Four European Countries in 2016. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammilehto, O. 1996. “Miksi viidettä ydinvoimalaa ei rakennettu? Ydinvoimanvastaisen liikkeen historiaa.” [Why Wasn’t the Fifth Nuclear Power Plant Constructed? On the History of the Anti-Nuclear Movement]. http://www.tammilehto.info/ydi-his.php
   Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., M. Lehtonen, and M. Martiskainen. 2011. “Climate change, energy security and risk – Debating new nuclear build in Finland, France and the UK.” Energy Policy : 39 (6):3434–3442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehkalahti, P. 2015. “Pohjoisen ydinmylly. Fennovoima kolmessa suomalaisessa sanomalehdessä 2007–2013.” Media & viestintä 38 (2): 90–111.
   Google Scholar
• Vilhunen, T., M. Kojo, T. Litmanen, and B. Taebi. 2019. “Perceptions of Justice Influencing Community Acceptance of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal. A Case Study in Two Finnish Nuclear Communities.” Journal of Risk Research : 1–24. doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1569094.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 1999. “Democratic Theory and Trust.” Chap. 11 in Democracy and Trust, edited by M. E. Warren, 310–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylönen, M., T. Litmanen, M. Kojo, and P. Lindell. 2017. “The (de)Politicisation of Nuclear Power: The Finnish Discussion after Fukushima.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 26 (3): 215–260. doi:10.1177/0963662515613678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. 2014. Political Trust. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by A. C. Michalos. Dordrecht: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-0753-5_2202
   Google Scholar