Trust, mistrust and distrust as blind spots of Social Licence to Operate: illustration via three forerunner countries in nuclear waste management

References

• Agacinski, D. 2018. Expertise et démocratie: faire avec la défiance. Paris: France Stratégie. December. https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/publications/expertise-democratie-faire-defiance.
   Google Scholar
• Algan, Y., P. Cahuc, A. Zylberberg. 2012. La fabrique de la défiance… Et comment s’en sortir. Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Allard, O., M. Carey, and R. Renault. 2016. “De l’art de se méfier [the art of mistrust].” Tracés 31 (2): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, U. 2017. Trust – the Nordic Gold. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1095959/FULLTEXT02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2008. Scandinavian Politics Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, M., and H. S. Christensen. 2016. “When Trust Matters – a Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Generalized Trust on Political Participation in 25 European Democracies.” Journal of Civil Society 12 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1176730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bice, S., M. Brueckner, and C. Pforr. 2017. “Putting Social License to Operate on the Map: A Social, Actuarial and Political Risk and Licensing Model (SAP Model),” Resources Policy 53(September): 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 2016. The Legacy of Nuclear Power. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boutilier, R. G. 2017. “A Measure of the Social License to Operate for Infrastructure and Extractive Projects.” https://socialicense.com/publications/A
   Google Scholar
• Boutilier, R. G., and I. Thomson. 2011. “Modelling and Measuring the Social License to Operate: Fruits of a Dialogue Between Theory and Practice.” https://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, M., and M. Eabrasu. 2018. “Pinning Down the Social License to Operate (SLO): the Problem of Normative Complexity.” Resources Policy 59 (December): 217–226. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Allens, G., and A. Fuori. 2017. Bure, la bataille du nucléaire. Paris: Seuil and Reporterre.
   Google Scholar
• d’Iribarne, P. 2005. Les Français et les déchets nucléaires. Rapport au Ministre délégué à l’industrie. La Documentation française. https://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/054000355.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Demoskop. 2017. “Attityder till kärnkraften: Forsmark. Rapport till Vattenfall 017-12-06.” https://docplayer.se/107680737-Rapport-attityder-till-karnkraften-forsmark-vattenfall.html
   Google Scholar
• ECE 2007. “Social capital - ways ahead and ways blocked in national assessment and international comparisons. Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Commission – Conference of European Statisticians, Geneva, 11-13 June 2007. ECE/CES/2007/19; 2 April 2007.” https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G07/216/06/PDF/G0721606.pdf?OpenElement
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., and M. Kröger. 2017. “In the Shadows of Social Licence to Operate: untold Investment Grievances in Latin America.” Journal of Cleaner Production 141(January): 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, M., and G. Sundqvist. 2010. “Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The ‘Participatory Turn’ in European Nuclear Activities.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. 2010. “Europeans and Nuclear Safety.” Special Eurobarometer 324. Brussels: European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S769_72_2_EBS324.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Energy. 2018. Suomalaisten energia-asenteet 2018 [Energy attitudes of the Finns 2018]. Finnish Energy. November 2018. https://energia.fi/uutishuone/materiaalipankki/suomalaisten_energia-asenteet_2018.html
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B., and S. Bice. 2014. “Social Impact Assessment, Social Development Programmes and Social Licence to Operate: tensions and Contradictions in Intent and Practice in the Extractive Sector.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 32 (4): 327–335. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.950123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffron, R. J., L. Downes, O.M. Ramirez Rodriguez, and D. McCauley. (in press). “The Emergence of the ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in the Extractive Industries?” Resources Policy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717304786
   Google Scholar
• Ifop. 2018. Enquêtes locales auprès des riverains, Volet CMHM: Principaux enseignements. Ifop pour l’Andra. January.
   Google Scholar
• IRSN 2020. Baromètre IRSN: La perception des risques et de la sécurité par les Français. Fontenay-aux-Roses: Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire.
   Google Scholar
• Jartti, T., T. Litmanen, J. Lacey, and K. Moffat. 2020. “The National Level Paths to Mining Industry’s Social Licence to Operate (SLO): the Case of Finland.” The Extractive Industries and Society 7 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2020.01.006.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. J. 1990. Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jijelava, D., and F. Vanclay. 2017. “Legitimacy, Credibility and Trust as the Key Components of a Social Licence to Operate: An Analysis of BP’s Projects in Georgia.” Journal of Cleaner Production 140(part 3): 1077–1086. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jijelava, D., and F. Vanclay. 2018. “How a Large Project Was Halted by the Lack of a Social Licence to Operate: testing the Applicability of the Thomson and Boutilier Model.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 73(November): 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junkkari, R. 2003. “Ydinvoimaa vastaan.” In Kotiseutumme Eurajoki XX. Eurajoen Kotiseutuyhdistyksen ja kunnan kirjasto- ja kulttuurilautakunnan yhteinen julkaisu 65–70. Eurajoki: Eurajoen kotiseutuyhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A., M. Lehtonen, J.-H. Meyer, , and M. Rubio Varas. in press. “Nuclear Energy and Society in Post-War Europe: An Introduction.” In Engaging the Atom: The History of Nuclear Energy and Society in Europe from the 1950s to the Present, edited by A. Kaijser, M. Lehtonen, J.-H. Meyer, and M. Rubio Varas, Chapter 1. West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kari, M., M. Kojo, and M. Lehtonen. 2021. “Role of the Host Communities in Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Finland and Sweden.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 133: 103632. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kari, M., M. Kojo, and T. Litmanen. 2010. “Community Divided.” Adaptation and Aversion towards the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Eurajoki and Its Neighbouring Municipalities. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. University of Tampere. http://urn.fi/URN.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, C., Nordlund, A., and U. Lindgren. 2009. Grunden för beslut I kärnavfallsfrågan: Upplevelser av lagstiftningsgrund och MKB-process. SKB rapport R-09-11. Stockholm: SKB - Sven sk Kärnbränslehantering AB.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. 2012. “Kansallinen Toimijuus Suomalaisessa Politiikassa [National Agency in Finnish Politics].” In Suomalaisen politiikan murroksia ja muutoksia, edited by K. Paakkunainen. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, Politiikan ja talouden tutkimuksen laitoksen julkaisuja 2012/1.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M. 2009. “The Strategy of Site Selection for the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Finland.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power Policy in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 161–191. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., and P. Richardson. 2014. “The Use of Community Benefits Approaches in the Siting of Nuclear Waste Management Facilities.” Energy Strategy Reviews 4(August): 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2014.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., M. Kari, and T. Litmanen. 2012. “Nuclear Community Considering Threats and Benefits of Final Disposal. Local Opinions Regarding the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Finland.” International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 15 (2): 124–145. doi:10.1504/IJETM.2012.047231.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, M., M. Kari, T. Litmanen, T. Vilhunen, and M. Lehtonen. 2020. “The Critical Swedes and the Consensual Finns: Leading Newspapers as Watchdogs or Lapdogs of Nuclear Waste Repository Licensing?” Energy Research & Social Science 61. Article: 101354. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuryo 2011. La confiance: approche historique et sociologique. [Trust: an historical and sociological approach]. Le labo de la confiance Kuryo. 3 novembre 2011. http://kuryo.typepad.com/lelabodelaconfiance/2011/11/la-confiance-un-%C3%A9tat-des-savoirs.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lammi, H. 2009. “Social Dynamics behind the Changes in the NGOs anti-Nuclear Campaign, 1993–2002.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power Policy in Finland, edited by M. Kojo, and T. Litmanen, 69–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, É. 2009. “Peut-on se Fier à la Confiance? [Can we Trust Confidence?].” Revue de l’OFCE 108 (1): 5–30. no doi:10.3917/reof.108.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. 2014. “Les méthodes d’évaluation socioéconomique des grands projets: Revue de littérature, comparaisons internationales et applicabilité au projet Cigéo.” Rapport de Synthèse du projet « Etude sur les approches d’évaluation socio-économique applicables au Cigéo ». Rapport pour l’Andra, le 29 juin 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. 2015. “Megaproject Underway: Governance of Nuclear Waste Management in France.” In Governance of Nuclear Waste Management: An International Comparison, edited by A. Brunnengräber, M. R. Di Nucci, A. M. Isidoro Losada, L. Mez, and M. A. Schreurs, 117–138. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. 2016. “Conditions pour une évaluation socioéconomique par la cartographie de réseaux dans un contexte de méfiance : le projet de gestion des déchets radioactifs en France.” In Praxis de l’évaluation et de la révision des programmes publics: Approches, compétences et défis, edited by M. Lamari and J. Jacob, 261-280. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., and M. Kojo. 2019. “The Role and Functions of Community Benefit Schemes. Comparison of the Finnish and French Nuclear Waste Disposal Projects.” In Governing Nuclear Waste: Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability, edited by A. Brunnengräber, and M. R. Di Nucci. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, and T. Litmanen. 2017. “The Finnish Success Story in the Governance of a Megaproject: The (Minimal) Role of Socioeconomic Evaluation in the Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel.” In Socioeconomic Evaluation of Megaprojects: Dealing with Uncertainties, edited by M. Lehtonen, P.-B. Joly, and L. Aparicio, 83–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, M. Kari, and T. Litmanen. 2021. “Healthy Mistrust or Complacent Confidence? Civic Vigilance in the Reporting by Leading Newspapers on Nuclear Waste Disposal in Finland and France.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12210.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, T. Jartti, T. Litmanen, and M. Kari. 2020. “The Roles of the State and Social Licence to Operate? Lessons from Nuclear Waste Management in Finland, France, and Sweden.” Energy Research & Social Science 61 (March): 101353. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., A. Prades, J. Espluga, and W. Konrad. 2021. The emergence of mistrustful civic vigilance in Finnish, French, German and Spanish nuclear policies: ideological trust and (de)politicization. Journal of Risk Research https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1957986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. 2008. “Trust Your Compatriots, but Count Your Change: The Roles of Trust, Mistrust and Distrust in Democracy.” Political Studies 56 (2): 312–332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepage, C. 2014. L’Etat Nucléaire. Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, P., K. Gugerell, G. Poelzer, M. Hitch, and M. Tost. 2021. “European Mining and the Social License to Operate.” The Extractive Industries and Society 8 (2): 100787. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2020.07.021.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T. 2009. “The Temporary Nature of Societal Risk Evaluation: Understanding the Finnish Nuclear Decisions.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, edited by M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, 192–217. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., M. Kari, M. Kojo, and B. D. Solomon. 2017a. “Is There a Nordic Model of Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel? Governance Insights from Finland and Sweden.” Energy Research & Social Science 25(March): 19–30. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., M. Kojo, M. Kari, and J. Vesalainen. 2017b. “Does Technical Risk Dialogue Entail Socioeconomic Evaluation? The Case of Scientific Dispute over Copper Corrosion in a Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Project.” In Socioeconomic Evaluation of Megaprojects: Dealing with Uncertainties, edited by M. Lehtonen, P.-B. Joly, and L. Aparicio, 134–158. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., T. Jartti, and E. Rantala. 2016. “Refining the Preconditions of a Social Licence to Operate (SLO): Reflections on Citizens’ Attitudes in Two Finnish Regions.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (3): 782–792. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, H. 2017. “Social Resistance to Coal Seam Gas Development in the Northern Rivers Region of Eastern Australia: Proposing a Diamond Model of Social License to Operate.” Land Use Policy 69(December): 266–280. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, T. G., and A. Zhang. 2019. “Social Licence, Gender and Mining: Moral Conviction and Perceived Economic Importance.” Resources Policy 61(June): 363–368. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meesters, M., and J. Behagel. 2017. “The Social Licence to Operate: ambiguities and the Neutralization of Harm in Mongolia.” Resources Policy 53(September): 274–282. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat, K., J. Lacey, A. Zhang, and S. Leipold. 2016. “The Social Licence to Operate: A Critical Review.” Forestry 89 (5): 477–488. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpv044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEA. 2002. Radioactive Waste Management Stepwise Decision Making in Finland for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Workshop Proceedings – Turku, Finland – November 15–16, 2001. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• NEA. 2010. Partnering for Long-Term Management of Radioactive Waste: Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• NEA. 2019. Country-Specific Safety Culture Forum: Finland. NEA Report no. 7488. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Novus. 2018. Novus SKB Opinionsmätning Östhammar våren 2018. SKB. Novus: Gun Pettersson. Datum: 2018-05-21. http://docplayer.se/195303315-Skb-opinionsmatning-osthammar-varen-2018.html
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Government at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/gov_glance-2013-en.
   Google Scholar
• OPECST. 2019. Soudures de l’EPR de Flamanville: audition des acteurs concernés. Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques, 17 juillet 2019. Paris: Sénat. http://videos.senat.fr/video.1265985_5d2cfdbf51f99.audition-pleniere–-epr-de-flamanville
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. 2016. “Social License and the Fear of Mineras Interruptus.” Geoforum 77(December): 102–105. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., and D. Kemp. 2013. “Social Licence and Mining: A Critical Perspective.” Resources Policy 38 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T., and S. Nurmela. 2007. Eri tapoja kohdata suuri elefantti. Suomalaisen ja ruotsalaisen kulttuurin vertaileva tutkimus. Espoo: Suomalais-ruotsalainen kulttuurirahasto.
   Google Scholar
• Petts, J. 2008. “Public Engagement to Build Trust: false Hopes?” Journal of Risk Research 11 (6): 821–835. doi:10.1080/13669870701715592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, T. 2007. “What Could Have Been Done? Reflections on the Radwaste-Battle, as Seen From Below.” Presented at the European Nuclear Critical Conference 2007, Helsinki, November 9–11, 2007. http://sydaby.eget.net/kil/rosenberg1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rouban, L. 2018. “La démocratie représentative est-elle en crise?.” La Documentation française. ISBN: 978-2-11-145514-6
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2007. “Democratic ‘Misfit’? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union.” Political Studies 55 (2): 384–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säynässalo, E. 2009. “Nuclear Energy Policy Processes in Finland in a Comparative Perspective: Complex Mechanisms of a Strong Administrative State.” In The Renewal of Nuclear Power Policy in Finland, edited by M. Kojo, and T. Litmanen, 126–158. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., R. P. J. M. Raven, and A. van Venrooij. 2010. “From Riches to Rags: Biofuels, Media Discourses, and Resistance to Sustainable Energy Technologies.” Energy Policy 38 (9): 5013–5027. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKOP. 2012. Opinionsundersökning om slutförvaring av använt kärnbränsle. Telefonintervjuer i Uppsala län, Gävle kommun och Norrtälje kommun under november-december 2012 av SKOP. Rapport till Regionförbundet Uppsala län, December 2012. http://docplayer.se/7429288-Opinionsundersokning-om-slutforvaring-av-anvant-karnbransle.html
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, P. 1999. “Values, Ideology and Politics in Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 28 (2): 161–170. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00139-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G. 2002. The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu, S. 2008. “Confronting Nuclear Risks: Counter-Expertise as Politics within the French Nuclear Energy Debate.” Nature and Culture 3 (2): 225–245. doi:10.3167/nc.2008.030205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W., and S. Zmerli. 2010. “ “Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy – a “Dark Side” of Social Capital?” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5): 631–639. (5): doi:10.1177/0002764209350827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhunen, T., M. Kojo, T. Litmanen, and B. Taebi. 2019. “Perceptions of Justice Influencing Community Acceptance of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal. A Case Study in Two Finnish Nuclear Communities.” Journal of Risk Research 1–24. doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1569094.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. J. A., B. Wiersma, and E. Bailey. 2014. “Community Benefits, Framing and the Social Acceptance of Offshore Wind Farms: An Experimental Study in England,”Applied Energy, 279(December). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115750.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, A., and R. McCrea. 2020. Understanding social licence to operate for onshore gas development: How the underlying drivers fit together. Applied Energy 279(December). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wärnbäck, A., L. Soneryd, and T. Hilding-Rydevik. 2013. “Shared Practice and Converging Views in Nuclear Waste Management: Long-Term Relations between Implementer and Regulator in Sweden.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (9): 2212–2226. doi:10.1068/a45305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 1999. “Democratic Theory and Trust.” In Democracy and Trust, edited by M.E. Warren. 310–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yli-Kauhaluoma, S., and H. Hänninen. 2014. “Tale Taming Radioactive Fears: Linking Nuclear Waste Disposal to the "Continuum of the Good.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 23 (3): 316–330. doi:10.1177/0963662513503773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., and K. Moffat. 2015. “A Balancing Act: The Role of Benefits, Impacts and Confidence in Governance in Predicting Acceptance of Mining in Australia.” Resources Policy 44(June): 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar