Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste: trust, cost and social acceptability

References

• Ahearne, J. F. 2000. “Intergenerational Issues regarding Nuclear Power, Nuclear Waste, and Nuclear Weapons.” Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 20 (6): 763–770. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.206070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, B. W., P. V. Brady, P. V. S. J. Bauer, C. Herrick, S. Pye, and J. Finger. 2011. Reference Design and Operations for Deep Borehole Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste. SAND2011-6749. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, E., and M. Poole. 2001. “The Problem of the UK’s Radioactive Waste: What Have We Learnt?” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 26 (4): 296–302. doi:10.1179/isr.2001.26.4.296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E. A., M. J. Driscoll, R. K. Lester, and B. W. Arnold. 2014. “Can Deep Boreholes Solve America׳ s Nuclear Waste Problem?” Energy Policy 72: 186–189. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2009. “A Quantitative Assessment of the Insider/Outsider Dimension of the Cultural Theory of Risk and Place.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (6): 771–791. doi:10.1080/13669870802579806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2013. “Living in and Coping with a World Risk Society. Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security–Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks.” In Humanity at Risk: The Need for Global Governance, edited by D. Innerarity and J. Solana, 11–16. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmans, A., G. Sundqvist, D. Kos, and P. Simmons. 2015. “The Participatory Turn in Radioactive Waste Management: Deliberation and the Social–Technical Divide.” Journal of Risk Research 18 (3): 347–363. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.971335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beswick, A. J., F. G. F. Gibb, and K. P. Travis. 2014. “Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: Engineering Challenges.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy 167 (2): 47–66. doi:10.1680/ener.13.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K. 2012. “Because We’ve Got History Here”: Nuclear Waste, Cooperative Siting, and the Relational Geography of a Complex Issue.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (11): 2611–2628. doi:10.1068/a44583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 2010. “Why Dump on us? Power, Pragmatism and the Periphery in the Siting of New Nuclear Reactors in the UK.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7 (3): 157–173. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2010.506488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 2014. “A Geological Disposal Facility for Nuclear Waste – If Not Sellafield, Then Where?” Town & Country Planning 83 (12): 545–553, December.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 2016. The Legacy of Nuclear Power. Abingdon: Earthscan from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A., D. Lowry, and B. Solomon. 1991. The International Politics of Nuclear Waste. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, F. 2016. “The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise.” Perspectives on Science 24 (5): 582–608. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00224.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, P. V., B. W. Arnold, G. A. Freeze, P. N. Swift, S. J. Bauer, J. L. Kanney, R. P. Rechard, and J. S. Stein. 2009. Deep Borehole Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, P. V., G. A. Freeze, K. L. Kuhlman, E. L. Hardin, D. C. Sassani, and R. J. MacKinnon. 2017. “Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: US Perspective.” In Geological Repository Systems for Safe Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuels and Radioactive Waste. 2nd ed. edited by M. J. Apted and J. Ahn, 89–112. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, A. 1997. “Ethics of Wastes: The Case of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle.” In Contemporary Moral Issues, edited by A. W. Cragg and C. M. Koggel, 117–132. Toronto: McGraw Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnengräber, Achim, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez, and Miranda A. Schreurs. 2018. Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison. Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L. J. 2015. Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust: Dealing with Radioactive Waste. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, N. A. 2019. “Who Might Be Interested in a Deep Borehole Disposal Facility for Their Radioactive Waste?” Energies 12 (8): 1542. doi:10.3390/en12081542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, N., and F. Gibb. 2003. “A Truly Final Waste Management Solution - is Very Deep Borehole Disposal a Realistic Option for HLW or Fissile Material.” RadWaste Solutions 10 (4): 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Charnley-Parry, I., J. Whitton, G. Rowe, W. Konrad, J-H. Meyer, M. D. Cotton, and A. Enander. 2017. Principles for Effective Engagement. D5.1 for the History of Nuclear Energy and Society Project. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. 2007. “Toward Analytic-Deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste.” Journal of Risk Research 10 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1080/13669870601147581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Jacquelin Burgess. 2008. “Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (8): 1881–1900. doi:10.1068/a40334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. 2018. “Trust in Nuclear Companies and Social Acceptance of a Nuclear Waste Repository in Finland.” Journal of Environmental Information Science 2018 (1): 44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, J., E. Göll, and V. Tappeser. 2017. “Sticky Transformation–How Path Dependencies in Socio-Technical Regimes Are Impeding the Transformation to a Green Economy.” Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2): 111–138. doi:10.24840/2183-0606_005.002_0008.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. Pinter: London.
   Google Scholar
• CoRWM. 2006. Managing Our Radioactive Waste Safely: CoRWM’s Recommendations to Government. London: Committee on Radioactive Waste Management.
   Google Scholar
• CoRWM. 2019. CoRWM Position Paper: Deep Borehole Disposal 04 July 2019. CoRWM doc. 3574. London: Committee on Radioactive Waste.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. 2013. “Deliberating Intergenerational Environmental Equity: A Pragmatic, Future Studies Approach.” Environmental Values 22 (3): 317–337. doi:10.3197/096327113X13648087563665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. 2017. Nuclear Waste Politics: An Incrementalist Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. 2018. “Environmental Justice as Scalar Parity: Lessons from Nuclear Waste Management.” Social Justice Research 31 (3): 238–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damveld, H., and J. R. van-den-Berg. 2002. Nuclear Waste and Nuclear Ethics: Social and Ethical Aspects of the Retrievable Storage of Nuclear Waste. Amsterdam: Damveld, I.B.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy & Climate Change. 2013. Energy Secretary Responds to Cumbria Nuclear Waste Vote. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change and The Rt Hon Edward Davey.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy & Climate Change. 2014. Implementing Geological Disposal: A Framework for the Long-Term Management of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste. London: Department of Energy & Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Di Nucci, M. R., and A. Brunnengräber. 2019. “Making Nuclear Waste Problems Governable: Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability.” In Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance, edited by A. Brunnengräber and M. Di Nucci, 3–19. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. J., R. K. Lester, K. G. Jensen, B. W. Arnold, P. N. Swift, and P. V. Brady. 2012. “Technology and Policy Aspects of Deep Borehole Nuclear Waste Disposal.” Nuclear Technology 180 (1): 111–121. doi:10.13182/NT12-A14523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espluga, J., B. Medina, W. Konrad, A. Bergmans, I. Charnley-Parry, P. Cools, and M. Cotton, et al. 2018. D4.3: Case Studies Reports: In-Depth Understanding of the Mechanisms for Effective Interaction with Civil Society: Selected Case Studies. Ref. Ares(2018)2779818 - 29/05/2018. Brussels: Euratom.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform: Vision Document. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Falck, W. E., and K. F. Nilsson. 2009. Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste. JRC Reference Report EUR 23925 EN. Brussels: European Commission Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Flüeler, T. 2006. Decision Making for Complex Socio-Technical Systems: Robustness from Lessons Learned in Long Term Radioactive Waste Governance. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flüeler, T. 2020. “Strategic Monitoring-A Proposal for the Institutional Surveillance of Complex and Long-Term Nuclear Waste Disposal Programmes.” Medcave Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 1 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeze, G. A., E. Stein, and P. V. Brady. 2019. “Post-Closure Performance Assessment for Deep Borehole Disposal of Cs/Sr Capsules.” Energies 12 (10): 1980. doi:10.3390/en12101980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genus, A. 2000. Decisions, Technology and Organizations. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, F. G. F., K. P. Travis, and K. W. Hesketh. 2012. “Deep Borehole Disposal of Higher Burn up Spent Nuclear Fuels.” Mineralogical Magazine 76 (8): 3003–3017. doi:10.1180/minmag.2012.076.8.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, F. G. F. 1999. “High-Temperature, Very Deep, Geological Disposal: A Safer Alternative for High-Level Radioactive Waste?” Waste Management 19 (3): 207–211. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(99)00050-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N. 2012. “Projected Futures: The Political Matter of UK Higher Activity Radioactive Waste.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (8): 2006–2022. doi:10.1068/a44600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1-2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2005. “Coalitions, Practices and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, edited by D. Howarth and J. Torfing, 297–315. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O., and M. Peterson. 2001. “Rights, Risks, and Residual Obligations.” Risk, Decision and Policy 6 (3): 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, H., J. Adkins, W. Heroy, W. Benson, M. K. Hubbert, J. C. Frye, R. Russel, and T. Theis. 1957. The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyd, D. 1982. Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R., and C. Matthews. 2008. “Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 10 (3): 217–232. doi:10.1080/15239080802242662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotes, S., and L. Opgenoorth. 2014. “Trust and Control at the Science–Policy Interface in IPBES.” BioScience 64 (4): 277–278. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. E. H., and B. Taebi. 2019. “Multinational Energy Justice for Managing Multinational Risks: A Case Study of Nuclear Waste Repositories.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 10 (2): 176–196. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. 1993. Conservation and Retrieval of Information: Elements of a Strategy to Inform Future Societies about Nuclear Waste Repositories. Copenhagen: The Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Krannich, R. S., R. L. Little, and L. A. Cramer. 1993. “Rural Community Residents’ Views of Nuclear Waste Repository Siting in Nevada.” In Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste, edited by R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft, and E. A. Rosa, 263–287. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., T. Flüeler, M. Stauffacher, A. Wiek, and R. W. Scholz. 2010. “Technical Safety vs. public Involvement? A Case Study on the Unrealized Project for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland).” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7 (3): 229–244. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2010.506879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, D. Pedolin, C. Moser, and R. W. Scholz. 2012. “The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting for Nuclear Waste.” Social Justice Research 25 (1): 79–101. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0147-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J., M. Howden, C. Cvitanovic, and R. M. Colvin. 2018. “Understanding and Managing Trust at the Climate Science–Policy Interface.” Nature Climate Change 8 (1): 22–28. doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0010-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, C., and A. Bergmans. 2015. “Long-Term Repository Governance: A Socio-Technical Challenge.” Journal of Risk Research 18 (3): 378–391. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.913658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. 2009. “Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 369–391. doi:10.1080/14649350903229810.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, W. F., J. Whitton, and C. Poppeliers. 2008. “Case Studies from the United Kingdom and the United States of Stakeholder Decision Making on Radioactive Waste Management.” Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 12 (2): 70–78. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2008)12:2(70).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. 2010. “Opening up or Closing down Radioactive Waste Management Policy? Debates on Reversibility and Retrievability in Finland, France, and the United Kingdom.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 135–179. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1044.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Cotton, and T. Kasperski. 2021. “Trust and Mistrust in Radioactive Waste Management: Historical Experience from High-and Low-Trust Contexts.” In Engaging the Atom: The History of Nuclear Energy and Society in Europe from the 1950s to the Present, edited by A. Kaijser, M. Lehtonen, J-H. Meyer, and M. Rubio-Varas. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., and L. De Carlo. 2019. “Diffuse Institutional Trust and Specific Institutional Mistrust in Nordic Participatory Planning: Experience from Contested Urban Projects.” Planning Theory & Practice 20 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1080/14649357.2019.1606929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., P. Joly, and L. Aparicio. 2016. Socioeconomic Evaluation of Megaprojects: Dealing with Uncertainties. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and G. Sundqvist. 2004. “On the Right Track? Technology, Geology and Society in Swedish Nuclear Waste Management.” Journal of Risk Research 7 (2): 251–268. doi:10.1080/1366987042000171924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and I. Elander. 1992. “Reinterpreting Locational Conflicts: NIMBY and Nuclear Waste Management in Sweden.” Policy & Politics 20 (4): 1– 64. doi:10.1332/030557392782454033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E. 1996. “The Barsebäck Nuclear Plant Case.” Energy Policy 24 (8): 689–696. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(96)00042-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, A. M. 2003. “Underlying Yucca Mountain the Interplay of Geology and Policy in Nuclear Waste Disposal.” Social Studies of Science 33 (5): 783–807. doi:10.1177/0306312703335006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, C. R. 1991. “High-Level Nuclear Waste Disposal: A Perspective on Technocracy and Democracy.” Growth and Change 22 (2): 69–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00549.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. 2006. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R. A., S. Finsterle, J. Grimsich, R. Baltzer, E. A. Muller, J. W. Rector, J. Payer, and J. Apps. 2019. “Disposal of High-Level Nuclear Waste in Deep Horizontal Drillholes.” Energies 12 (11): 2052. doi:10.3390/en12112052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDA. 2012. Geological Disposal: Assessment of the Geological Disposal Facility Implications for the Products of Reprocessing Compared to the Direct Disposal of the Spent Fuel. NDA Technical Note No. 16518861. Didcot: Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1977. “In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation.” In Innovation, Economic Change and Technology Policies, 215–245. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nirex. 1997. Sellafield Geological and Hydrogeological Investigations: The Geological Structure of the Sellafield Site. Harwell: United Kingdom Nirex Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nolin, J. 1993. “Communicating with the Future: Implications for Nuclear Waste Disposal.” Futures 25 (7): 778–791. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90024-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, W. D. 1999. “A Perspective on Nuclear Waste.” Risk Analysis 19 (4): 751–758. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00444.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C. 1983. “Implementation Approaches for Project Planning.” Academy of Management Review 8 (4): 600–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. T., L. H. Cohen, T. N. Narasimhan, T. L. Simkin, H. A. Wollenberg, W. F. Brace, S. Green, and H. P. Pratt. 1979. The very deep hole concept: evaluation of an alternative for nuclear waste disposal (No. LBL-7089). California University, Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab and Terra Tek Inc. Salt Lake City UT.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., R. Grundmann, M. Hulme, S. Raman, E. Hadley Kershaw, and J. Tsouvalis. 2017. “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus.” Environmental Communication 11 (6): 723–730. doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1333965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescatore, C., and A. Vári. 2006. “Stepwise Approach to the Long‐Term Management of Radioactive Waste.” Journal of Risk Research 9 (1): 13–40. doi:10.1080/13669870500180048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., J. Pierre, and D. S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1275–1300. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, T. V. 2001. Linked Arms: A Rural Community Resists Nuclear Waste. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J. K. 2013. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Project Plans: Recurring Human Errors That Can Ruin the Project Planning Process.” Business Horizons 56 (5): 643–653. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsky, Y., L. Capuano, J. Finger, M. Huh, S. Knudsen, A. Mansure, D. Raymond, and R. Swanson. 2008. Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Well Construction Technology Evaluation Report. Sandia Report, SAND2008-7866:1-108. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. G., W. C. Gunderson, H. Frazer, and J. M. Gillroy. 1994. “NIMBY and Maybe: Conflict and Cooperation in the Siting of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities in the United States and Canada.” Environmental Law 24 (1): 67–121.
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V. 2018. “Technical and Social Problems of Nuclear Waste.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 7 (4): e289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and T. Webler. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, Technology, Risk and Society. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. S., and M. G. Culshaw. 2003. “Communicating the Risks Arising from Geohazards.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 166 (2): 261–270. doi:10.1111/1467-985X.00275.
   Google Scholar
• Saling, J. 2018. Radioactive Waste Management. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N. K., and A. Thornhill. 2004. “Trust and Mistrust in Organizations: An Exploration Using an Organizational Justice Framework.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13 (4): 493–515. doi:10.1080/13594320444000182.
   Google Scholar
• Schively, C. 2007. “Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research.” Journal of Planning Literature 21 (3): 255–266. doi:10.1177/0885412206295845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellafield Ltd., and Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. 2020. Sellafield Ltd to Restart Reprocessing and Further Boost Operations in 2020. London: Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K. S. 2000. “Duties to Future Generations, Proxy Consent, intra- and intergenerational equity: The case of nuclear waste.” Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 20 (6): 771–777. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.206071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.” The American Economic Review 49 (3): 253–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 1996. “On the Nirex MADA [Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis]. Proof of Evidence.” In Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sellafield, UK: Site Selection, Geological and Engineering Problems, edited by R. S. Haszeldine and D. K. Smythe. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2004. “Opening Up or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” In Science, Citizenship and Globalisation, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and, B. Wynne. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., W. Foster, and A. J. Mills. 2014. “Historical Institutionalism.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 100–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G., and M. Elam. 2010. “Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The “Participatory Turn” in European Nuclear Activities.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 198– 129. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1046.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, P. N. 2017. Recent Developments in Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM).
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., M. Lehtonen, and M. Martiskainen. 2011. “Climate Change, Energy Security, and Risk—Debating Nuclear New Build in Finland, France and the UK.” Energy Policy 39 (6): 3434–3442. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst, D. 2007. “NIMBY or Not? Exploring the Relevance of Location and the Politics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2705–2714. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voosen, P. 2019. "Protests Spur Rethink on Deep Borehole Test for Nuclear Waste.” Science, September 27. Accessed 19 December 2019. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/09/protests-spur-rethink-deep-borehole-test-nuclear-waste.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. 2010. Rock Solid? A Scientific Review of Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste. Buxton: GeneWatch UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, M. K. 2008. “Disposing of Britain’s Nuclear Waste: The CoRWM Process.” Energy & Environment 19 (3–4): 515–557. doi:10.1260/095830508784641426.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, I. 1993. “The NIMBY Syndrome: It’s Significance in the History of the Nuclear Debate in Britain.” The British Journal for the History of Science 26 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1017/S0007087400030119.
   Google Scholar
• Whitton, J., I. M. Parry, M. Akiyoshi, and W. Lawless. 2015. “Conceptualizing a Social Sustainability Framework for Energy Infrastructure Decisions.” Energy Research & Social Science 8: 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T., D. Imbroscio, and G. Alperovitz. 2014. Making a Place for Community: Local Democracy in a Global Era. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear News. 2008. “Yucca Mountain Cost Estimate Rises to $96 Billion.” World Nuclear News. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/wr-yucca_mountain_cost_estimate_rises_to_96_billion_dollars-0608085.html.
   Google Scholar