References
- Abdel-Monem, T., S. Bingham, J. Marincic, and A. Tomkins. 2010. “Deliberation and Diversity: Perceptions of Small Group Discussions by Race and Ethnicity.” Small Group Research 41 (6): 746–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410377359.
- Abdullah, C., C. F. Karpowitz, and C. Raphael. 2016. “Affinity Groups, Enclave Deliberation, and Equity.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 12 (2): 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.258.
- Bar-Anan, Y., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2006. “The Association between Psychological Distance and Construal Level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (4): 609–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609.
- Barber, B. R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Bergmans, A., G. Sundqvist, D. Kos, and P. Simmons. 2015. “The Participatory Turn in Radioactive Waste Management: Deliberation and the Social–Technical Divide.” Journal of Risk Research 18 (3): 347–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.971335.
- Blacksher, E., V. Y. Hiratsuka, J. W. Blanchard, J. R. Lund, J. Reedy, J. A. Beans, B. Saunkeah, et al. 2021. “Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States.” AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (3): 164–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775.
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Brügger, A. 2020. “Understanding the Psychological Distance of Climate Change: The Limitations of Construal Level Theory and Suggestions for Alternative Theoretical Perspectives.” Global Environmental Change 60: 102023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102023.
- Brügger, A., S. Dessai, P. Devine-Wright, T. A. Morton, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2015. “Psychological Responses to the Proximity of Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 5 (12): 1031–1037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2760.
- Brügger, A., T. A. Morton, and S. Dessai. 2016. “Proximising” Climate Change Reconsidered: A Construal Level Theory Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 46: 125–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.004.
- Burkhalter, S., J. Gastil, and T. Kelshaw. 2002. “A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups.” Communication Theory 12 (4): 398–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00276.x.
- Cohen, J. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, edietd by A. Hamlin and P. Petit. New York: Blackwell.
- Fishkin, J. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Flynn, R., M. Ricci, and P. Bellaby. 2013. “Deliberation over New Hydrogen Energy Technologies: Evidence from Two Citizens’ Panels in the UK.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (3–4): 379–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.743160.
- Fujita, K., M. Henderson, J. Eng, Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2006. “Research Report Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events.” Psychological Science 17 (4): 278–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x.
- Gastil, J. 2008. Political communication and deliberation Sage.
- Gutmann, A., and D. F. Thompson 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Guttman, N. 2007. “Bringing the Mountain to the Public: Dilemmas and Contradictions in the Procedures of Public Deliberation Initiatives That Aim to Get “Ordinary Citizens” to Deliberate Policy Issues.” Communication Theory (1050-3293), 17 (4): 411–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x.
- Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Kim, D. H., Y. Sung, and M. Drumwright. 2018. “Where I Come From’ Determines, ‘How I Construe my Future’: The Fit Effect of Culture, Temporal Distance, and Construal Level.” International Journal of Advertising 37 (2): 270–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1238661.
- Kim, H., and S. Youn. 2019. “Consumers as Time Travelers: The Moderating Effects of Risk Perception and Construal Level on Consumers’ Responses to Temporal Framing.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (8): 1070–1097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1556065.
- Kim, K., and H.-S. Kim. 2018. “Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers’ Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks .” Health Communication 33 (3): 338–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266579.
- Klinke, A. 2021. “Public Understanding of Risk and Risk Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 24 (1): 2–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1750464.
- Knobloch, K. R., J. Gastil, J. Reedy, and K. Cramer Walsh. 2013. “Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 41 (2): 105–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.760746.
- Kwon, K. H., M. Chadha, and K. Pellizzaro. 2017. “Proximity and Terrorism News in Social Media: A Construal-Level Theoretical Approach to Networked Framing of Terrorism in Twitter.” Mass Communication and Society 20 (6): 869–894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1369545.
- LeCompte, M. D. 2000. “Analyzing Qualitative Data.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 146–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_5.
- Leighninger, M. 2013. “Mapping Deliberative Civic Engagement: Pictures from a (r)Evolution.” In Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Leighninger, and G. M. Weiksner, 19–39. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Leighter, J. L., and L. Black. 2010. “I’m Just Raising the Question”: Terms for Talk and Practical Metadiscursive Argument in Public Meetings.” Western Journal of Communication 74 (5): 547–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512281.
- Liberman, N., M. D. Sagristano, and Y. Trope. 2002. “The Effect of Temporal Distance on Level of Mental Construal.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (6): 523–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8.
- Liland, A., Y. Tomkiv, D. Oughton, S. Navrud, E. Romstad, and L. Skuterud. 2019. “The Power of Collaborative Deliberation in Stakeholder Dialogue Seminars.” Journal of Risk Research 22 (2): 243–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1378247.
- Liviatan, I., Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2008. “Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others’ Actions.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (5): 1256–1269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007.
- Lutchyn, Y., and M. Yzer. 2011. “Construal Level Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior: Time Frame Effects on Salient Belief Generation.” Journal of Health Communication 16 (6): 595–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551991.
- Myers, C. D., T. Ritter, and A. Rockway. 2017. “Community Deliberation to Build Local Capacity for Climate Change Adaptation: The Rural Climate Dialogues Program.” In Climate Change Adaptation in North America: Fostering Resilience and the Regional Capacity to Adapt, edited by W. Leal Filho and J. M. Keenan, 9–26. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53742-9_2.
- Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, M., and Leighninger, M., eds. 2013. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York: Oxford University Press.
- NOAA. 2019. Tropical Cyclone History for the Southeast South Carolina and Northern Portions of Southeast Georgia. NOAA. Updated 12/5/2019. https://www.weather.gov/chs/TChistory
- O’doherty, Kieran C., and Helen J. Davidson. 2010. “Subject Positioning and Deliberative Democracy: Understanding Social Processes Underlying Deliberation.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (2): 224–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00429.x.
- Pettit, P. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by J. Fishkin and P. Laslett, 138–162. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Petts, J., and C. Brooks. 2006. “Expert Conceptualizations of the Role of Lay Knowledge in Environmental Decision-Making: Challenges for Deliberative Democracy.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (6): 1045–1059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a37373.
- Pidgeon, N. 2021. “Engaging Publics about Environmental and Technology Risks: Frames, Values and Deliberation.” Journal of Risk Research 24 (1): 28–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1749118.
- Polletta, Francesca, and James M. Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 283–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283.
- Pounders, K. R., M. B. Royne, and S. Lee. 2019. “The Influence of Temporal Frame on Guilt and Shame Appeals.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising ( Advertising 40 (3): 245–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1503115.
- Reedy, J., and C. Anderson. 2019. “Group Communication and Security—Small Groups for Good or Ill: Developing a Group Communication Approach to Security.” In The Handbook of Communication and Security edited by B. C. Taylor and H. Bean. Routledge.
- Renn, O. 1999. “A Model for an Analytic − Deliberative Process in Risk Management.” Environmental Science & Technology 33 (18): 3049–3055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/es981283m.
- Sprain, L. 2018. “Framing Science for Democratic Engagement.” In Ethical Issues in Science Communication: A Theory-Based Approach, edited by S. Priest, J. Goodwin, and M. Dahlstrom, 74–90. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Sprain, L., and L. Reinig. 2018. “Citizens Speaking as Experts: Expertise Discourse in Deliberative Forums.” Environmental Communication 12 (3): 357–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394894.
- Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance.” Psychological Review 117 (2): 440–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963.
- USFCRP. 2017. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I. Washington, DC.
- USFCRP. 2018. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. Washington, DC.
- Wang, S., M. J. Hurlstone, Z. Leviston, I. Walker, and C. Lawrence. 2019. “Climate Change From a Distance: An Analysis of Construal Level and Psychological Distance From Climate Change.” Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230
- Zwickle, A., and R. S. Wilson. 2013. “Construing Risk: Implications for Risk Communication.” In Effective Risk Communication, edited by J. Arvai and L. Rivers, 216–229. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.