Striving for technical consensus by agreeing to disagree: the case of monitoring underground nuclear waste disposal facilities

References

• Act No. 2016-1015. 2016. Loi n° 2016-1015 du 25 juillet 2016 précisant les modalités de création d’une installation de stockage réversible en couche géologique profonde des déchets radioactifs de haute et moyenne activité à vie longue (JORF n°0172 du 26 Juillet 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, Jonas, and Vasilis Galis. 2011. “(Re-)Constructing Nuclear Waste Management in Sweden: The Involvement of Concerned Groups 1970–2010.” In Integrated Waste Management. Vol. II, edited by S. Kumar, 401–430. Rijeka: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• ASN. 2008. Guide de sûreté relatif au stockage définitif des déchets radioactifs en formation géologique profonde. Montrouge: Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire.
   Google Scholar
• Barthe, Yannick, Mark Elam, and Göran Sundqvist. 2020. “Technological Fix or Divisible Object of Collective Concern? Histories of Conflict over the Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Sweden and France.” Science as Culture 29 (2): 196–218. doi:10.1080/09505431.2019.1645108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmans, Anne, Mark Elam, Peter Simmons, and Göran Sundqvist. 2012. Monitoring the Safe Disposal of Radioactive Waste: A Combined Technical and Socio-Political Activity. MoDeRn Deliverable 1.3.1. Brussel: EC & UAntwerpen.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., Stefan Timmermans, Adele E. Clarke, and Ellen Balka, eds. 2016. Boundary Objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M. 1992. Changing Order: Replication and the Induction in Scientific Practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M., and Robert Evans. 2015. “Expertise Revisited, Part I-Interactional expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2004. Thematic Network on the Role of Monitoring in a Phased Approach to Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste. Final Report. European Commission Project Report EUR 21025 EN. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2009. Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://op.europa.eu/s/n91L
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011. Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform. Strategic Research Agenda. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://igdtp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SRA-Complete-web-version_July-14_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020a. Harmonised Standards. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards_en.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020b. Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/construction/product-regulation/harmonised-standards_en.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020c. Technical Harmonisation and Standards: A New Approach. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/pt/p_85_12.
   Google Scholar
• EU (The Council of the European Union). 2011. Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM of 19 July 2011. L 199/48. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:199:0048:0056:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrety, Karin. 1997. “Social Worlds, Actor-Networks and Controversy: The Case of Cholesterol, Dietary Fat and Heart Disease.” Social Studies of Science 27 (5): 727–773. doi:10.1177/030631297027005002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, Michael E., ed. 2010. Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 1999. “Stabilizing the Boundary between U.S. Politics and Science: The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization.” Social Studies of Science 29 (1): 87–112. doi:10.1177/030631299029001004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horizon2020. 2020. What is Horizon2020? Accessed 28 May 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, Maja, and Alan Irwin. 2010. “Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness.” Social Studies of Science 40 (1): 105–126. doi:10.1177/0306312709341500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2001. Monitoring of Geological Repositories for High Level Radioactive Waste. Accessed 6 April 2021. http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/6191/Monitoring-of-Geological-Repositories-for-High-Level-Radioactive-Waste.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2014. Monitoring and Surveillance of Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-31. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1640_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IGD-TP. 2011. Strategic Research Agenda 2011. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://igdtp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SRA-Complete-web-version_July-14_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IGD-TP. 2015. Master Deployment Plan 2015 - IGD-TP. Accessed 6 April 2021. www.igdtp.eu/index.php/…/409-master-deployment-plan-2015.
   Google Scholar
• IGD-TP. 2016. Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform. Accessed 6 April 2021. http://www.igdtp.eu/index.php/presentation.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppler, Sophie, and Peter Hocke. 2019. “The Role of Long-Term Planning in Nuclear Waste Governance.” Journal of Risk Research 22 (11): 1343–1356. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1459791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, Meritxell, and Anne Bergmans. 2012. “Reflecting on the Implementing Geological Disposal Technology Platform as a Knowledge Network and Potential Scenarios for Stakeholder Involvement.” Insotech: Deliverable 3.1.”
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Boaz. 2016. “Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.” Foundations of Science 21 (1): 15–33. doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9373-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modern2020. 2014. Development and Demonstration of Monitoring Strategies and Technologies for Geological Disposal – Modern2020. European Commission Horizon 2020 Call: NFRP-2014-2015. RIA Proposal Number: 662177.
   Google Scholar
• Modern2020. 2015. Work Package 2 Questionnaire ‘Monitoring Programme Design Basis, Decision Making and Monitoring Strategies’ (Modern2020 Unpublished Project Material).
   Google Scholar
• Modern2020. 2016a. Deliverable D2.1: Repository Monitoring Strategies and Screening Methodologies. Work Package 2. Accessed 28 May 2021. http://www.modern2020.eu/fileadmin/Deliverables/Modern2020_D2.1_Repository_Monitoring_Strategies_and_Screening_Methodologies_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Modern2020. 2016b. About Modern2020. Accessed 6 April 2021. http://www.modern2020.eu/about-us/about-modern2020.html.
   Google Scholar
• Modern2020. 2019. Project Synthesis – Repository Monitoring: Strategies, Technologies and Implementation (Deliverable D6.5). http://www.modern2020.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Modern2020_D6.5_Project_Synthesis_v3_final_Small_quality.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nucci, Di, Maria Rosaria, Achim Brunnengräber, Lutz Mez, and Miranda Schreurs. 2015. “Comparative Perspectives on Nuclear Waste Governance.” In Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison, edited by Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Anna Maria Isidora Losada, Lutz Mez, and Miranda A. Schreurs, 25–43. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OECD-NEA. 2012. Reversibility of Decisions and Retrievability of Radioactive Waste: Considerations for National Geological Disposal Programmes. NEA No. 7085. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/reports/2012/7085-reversibility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SAPEA (Science Advice for Policy by European Academies). 2019. Making Sense of Science for Policy under Conditions of Complexity and Uncertainty. Evidence Review Report No. 6. Berlin: SAPEA. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://www.sapea.info/wp-content/uploads/MASOS-ERR-online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SFS (Svensk författningssamling) 1977:140. 1977. Lag om särskilt tillstånd att tillföra kärnreaktor kärnbränsle, m.m. (Villkorslagen).
   Google Scholar
• SFS (Svensk författningssamling) 1984:3. 1984. Lag om kärnteknisk verksamhet.
   Google Scholar
• SNETP. 2021. Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform. Accessed 11 June 2021. https://snetp.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• SSMFS. 2008. The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority’s Regulations and General Advice concerning Safety in Connection with the Disposal of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Waste. 2008:21. Accessed 6 April 2021. https://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/contentassets/d138388c47964b8a951ec8ca919ac485/ssmfs-200821-the-swedish-radiation-safety-authoritys-regulations-concerning-safety-in-connection-with-the-disposal-of-nuclear-material-and-nuclear-waste.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, Göran. 2002. The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1975. “The Rhetoric of Consensus Politics: A Critical Review of Technology Assessment.” Research Policy 4 (2): 108–158. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(75)90028-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar