Introduction to the special issue “Trust, mistrust, distrust, and trust-building in the nuclear sector: historical and comparative experience from Europe”

References

• Algan, Y, and P. Cahuc. 2007. La Société de Défiance. Paris: Editions ENS rue d’Ulm.
   Google Scholar
• Algan, Y. P. Cahuc, and A. Zylberberg. 2012. La Fabrique de la Défiance… et comment s’en sortir. Paris: Albin Michel.
   Google Scholar
• Allard, O., M. Carey, and R. Renault. 2016. “De l’art de se Méfier.” Tracés 31 (31): 7–20. doi:10.4000/traces.6684.
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E. B. Czarniawska, and L. Marcusson. 2013. Tillitens Gränser: Granskningskommissionens Slutbetänkande, Göteborg: Granskningskommissionen i Göteborgs Stad.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, M., and H. S. Christensen. 2016. “When Trust Matters—a Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Generalized Trust on Political Participation in 25 European Democracies.” Journal of Civil Society 12 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1176730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., I. Lorenzoni, N. F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and P. Simmons. 2008. “Reframing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 17 (2): 145–169. doi:10.1177/0963662506066719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carattini, S., A. Baranzini, and J. Roca. 2015. “Unconventional Determinants of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Trust.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (4): 243–257. doi:10.1002/eet.1685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley-Parry, I. J. Whitton, P. Cools, and A. Bergmans. 2018. Integrated Comparative Report for in-Depth Understanding of the Mechanisms for Effective Interaction with Civil Society. HoNESt Project Deliverable D 4.4. 18/05/2018. http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/all/themes/Porto_sub/downloads/deliverables/D4.4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F, and D. Torny. 1999. Les Sombres Précurseurs: une Sociologie Pragmatique de l’alerte et du Risque. Paris: Editions EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. 2017. Nuclear Waste Politics—an Incrementalist Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M. 2021. “Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: trust, Cost and Social Acceptability.” Journal of Risk Research: 1–16. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1957988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. 1988. “Trust as a Commodity.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relation, edited by Gambetta, D. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Di Nucci, M. R., A. M. I. Losada, and D. Themann. 2021. “Confidence Gap or Timid Trust Building? The Role of Trust in the Evolution of the Nuclear Waste Governance in Germany.” Journal of Risk Research: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1936605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. E., and M. Siegrist. 2006. “Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction between Trust and Confidence.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36 (2): 383–416. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. 1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.” Science, Technology & Human Values 15 (2): 226–243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluccio, C. 2018. “Trust in the Market: Institutions versus Social Capital.” Open Journal of Political Science 08 (02): 95–107. doi:10.4236/ojps.2018.82008.
   Google Scholar
• Gamero, N., J. Espluga, A. Prades, C. Oltra, R. Solá, and J. Farré. 2011. “Institutional Dimensions Underlying Public Trust in Information on Technological Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (6): 685–702. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.547260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, S., G. G. Bell, and J. L. Pierce. 2005. “The Perils of Pollyanna: Development of the over-Trust Construct.” Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1–3): 203–218. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-1415-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldson, A., R. Lidskog, and M. Wester-Herber. 2007. “The Battle for Hearts and Minds? Evolutions in Corporate Approaches to Environmental Risk Communication.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 (1): 56–72. doi:10.1068/c0617j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. R. 2014. “Energy Policy and Research: The Underappreciation of Trust.” Energy Research & Social Science 1 (1): 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 1999. “Do we Want Trust in Government?.” In Democracy and Trust, edited by Warren, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, V. 1978. Distrust and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• He, G., A. P. J. Mol, L. Zhang, and Y. Lu. 2014. “Nuclear Power in China after Fukushima: understanding Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Trust.” Journal of Risk Research 17 (4): 435–451. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.726251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S, and L. Weibull. 2017. “Långsiktiga Förändringar i Svenskt Institutionsförtroende.” In U. Andersson, J. Ohlsson, H. Oscarsson, & M. Oskarson (eds.), Larmar och Gör Sig till. SOM-Undersökningen 2016. SOM-rapport nr 70, SOM institut, Gothenburg. 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. 2007. “On the Signature of New Technologies: Materiality, Sociality and Practical Reasoning.” In Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Joly, P. B., and C. Le Renard. 2021. “The past Futures of Techno-Scientific Promises.” Science and Public Policy 48 (6): 900–910. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkbrenner, B. J., and J. Roosen. 2016. “Citizens’ Willingness to Participate in Local Renewable Energy Projects: The Role of Community and Trust in Germany.” Energy Research & Social Science 13 (March): 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A., and J.-H. Meyer. 2018. “Nuclear Installations at the Border. Transnational Connections and International Implications. An Introduction.” Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3: 1–32. doi:10.1484/J.JHES.5.116793.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A. M. Lehtonen, J.-H. Meyer, and M. Rubio-Varas (eds.). 2021. Engaging the Atom: The History of Nuclear Energy and Society in Europe from the 1950s to the Present. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kari, M., M. Kojo, and M. Lehtonen. 2021. “Role of the Host Communities in Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Finland and Sweden.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 133 (March): 103632. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103632.
   Google Scholar
• Karmis, D, and D. O’Toole. 2018. “Vigilance, Trust and ‘Fine Risks’ in the Minefield of Multinational Democracies.” In Trust, Distrust, Mistrust in Multinational Democracies. Comparative Perspectives, edited by D. Karmis, and F. Rocher. Montréal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 86–110. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3929089.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperski, T., and A. Stsiapanau. 2022. “Trust, Distrust and Radioactive Waste Management in Contemporary Russia.” Journal of Risk Research: 1–18. doi:10.1080/13669877.2022.2049619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kestilä-Kekkonen, E., and P. Söderlund. 2016. “Political Trust, Individual-Level Characteristics and Institutional Performance: Evidence from Finland, 2004–13.” Scandinavian Political Studies 39 (2): 138–160. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. 2016. “A Question of Confidence: Nuclear Waste and Public Trust in the United States after Fukushima.” In The Fukushima Effect: A New Geopolitical Terrain, edited by Hindmarsh, R. and Priestly, R. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaernes, U. 2006. “Trust and Distrust: Cognitive Decisions or Social Relations?” Journal of Risk Research 9 (8): 911–932. doi:10.1080/13669870601065577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, K., and V. Vainikka. 2019. “The Geopolitical Production of Trust Discourses in Finland: Perspectives from the Finnish-Russian Border.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 34 (5): 807–827. doi:10.1080/08865655.2019.1646152.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, W, and J. Espluga. 2018. Comparative cross-country analysis on preliminary identification of key factors underlying public perception and societal engagement with nuclear developments in different national contexts. HoNESt project deliverable D 4.2. March 2018. (co-authors Bergmans, A., Charnley-Parry, I., Cotton, M., Enander, A., Meyer, J.-H., Rowe, G. & Whitton, J.). http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/all/themes/Porto_sub/downloads/deliverables/D4.2_revised_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kujala, J., H. Lehtimäki, and R. Pučėtaitė. 2016. “Trust and Distrust Constructing Unity and Fragmentation of Organisational Culture.” Journal of Business Ethics 139 (4): 701–716. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2915-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuryo 2011. La confiance: approche historique et sociologique. Le labo de la confiance Kuryo. 3 novembre 2011. Available at: https://kuryo.typepad.com/lelabodelaconfiance/2011/11/la-confiance-un-%C3%A9tat-des-savoirs.html (consulted on 3 April 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, J., M. Howden, C. Cvitanovic, and R. M. Colvin. 2018. “Understanding and Managing Trust at the Climate Science–Policy Interface.” Nature Climate Change 8 (1): 22–28. doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0010-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafuente, R., P. Paneque, and J. Vargas. 2018. “The Role Played by Environmental Concern and Institutional Trust in Changing Public Preferences for Water Management.” Environmental Policy and Governance 28 (6): 441–452. doi:10.1002/eet.1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, É. 2009. “Peut-on se Fier à la Confiance.” ?” Revue de l’OFCE 2009/1 (108): 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. 2009. “Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 369–391. doi:10.1080/14649350903229810.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., and L. de Carlo. 2019. “Community Energy and the Virtues of Mistrust and Distrust: Lessons from Brighton and Hove Energy Cooperatives.” Ecological Economics 164 (October): 106367. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106367.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, T. Jartti, T. Litmanen, and M. Kari. 2020. “The Roles of the State and Social Licence to Operate? Lessons from Nuclear Waste Management in Finland, France, and Sweden.” Energy Research & Social Science 61 (March): 101353. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101353.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., M. Kojo, M. Kari, T. Jartti, and T. Litmanen. 2021. “Trust, Mistrust and Distrust as Blind Spots of Social Licence to Operate: illustration via Three Forerunner Countries in Nuclear Waste Management.” Journal of Risk Research : 1–17. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1957987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., A. Prades, J. Espluga, and W. Konrad. 2021. “The Emergence of Mistrustful Civic Vigilance in Finnish, French, German and Spanish Nuclear Policies: ideological Trust and (de)Politicization?” Journal of Risk Research: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1957986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. 2008. “Trust Your Compatriots, but Count Your Change: The Roles of Trust, Mistrust and Distrust in Democracy.” Political Studies 56 (2): 312–332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. J., and A. Weigert. 1985. “Trust as Social Reality.” Social Forces 63 (4): 967–985. doi:10.2307/2578601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., M. Kari, M. Kojo, and B. Solomon. 2017. “Is There a Nordic Model of Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel? Governance Insights from Finland and Sweden.” Energy Research & Social Science 25 (March): 19–30. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T., T. Jartti, and E. Rantala. 2016. “Refining the Preconditions of a Social Licence to Operate (SLO): Reflections on Citizens’ Attitudes in Two Finnish Regions.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (3): 782–792. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2006. La Confiance: un Mécanisme de Réduction de la Complexité Sociale. Economica. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.-H. 2021. “To Trust or Not to Trust? Structures, Practices and Discourses of Transboundary Trust around the Swedish Nuclear Power Plant Barsebäck near Copenhagen.” Journal of Risk Research: 1–15. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1913629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., and B. Woodman. 2010. “Towards Trust in Regulation—Moving to a Public Value Regulation.” Energy Policy 38 (6): 2644–2651. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, J., and D. Gray. 2010. “Consumer Engagement in Alternative energy—Can the Regulators and Suppliers Be Trusted?” Energy Policy 38 (6): 2664–2671. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEA. 2010. Partnering for Long-Term Management of Radioactive Waste: Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2017. “The Conceptual Framework of Political Support.” In Handbook on Political Trust, edited by Sonja Zmerli and Tom van der Meer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. forthcoming. In Praise of Skepticism: Trust but Verify. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Government at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2009. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Parkins, J. R., and R. E. Mitchell. 2005. “Public Participation as Public Debate: A Deliberative Turn in Natural Resource Management.” Society & Natural Resources 18 (6): 529–540. doi:10.1080/08941920590947977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J. 2008. “Public Engagement to Build Trust: false Hopes?” Journal of Risk Research 11 (6): 821–835. doi:10.1080/13669870701715592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, A., and M. A. Vélez. 2012. “Efficiency and Equity in Negotiated Resource Transfers: Contributions and Limitations of Trust with Limited Contracts.” Ecological Economics 74 (February): 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, F. 2015. “Motivations to Contribute to Public Goods: Beyond Rational Choice Economics.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (4): 230–242. doi:10.1002/eet.1684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades, A., J. Espluga, M. Real, and R. Solá. 2009. “The Siting of a Research Centre on Clean Coal Combustion and CO2 Capture in Spain: Some Notes on the Relationship between Trust and Lack of Public Information.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (5): 709–723. doi:10.1080/13669870902935460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J.Jr. 1984. “Selecting Strategies of Social Control over Organizational Life.” In Enforcing Regulation, edited by K. Hawkins and J.M. Thomas. Boston MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. 2006. La Contre-Démocratie: La Politique à l’âge de la Défiance. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., and D. Stolle. 2008. “The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust.” Comparative Politics 40 (4): 441–459. doi:10.5129/001041508X12911362383354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2020. “Rediscovering a Risky Ideology: technocracy and Its Effects on Technology Governance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (supp1): 112–116. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1816345.
   Google Scholar
• Santaoja, M., M. Laine, and H. Leino. 2016. “Joku Palikka Siitä Puuttuu”—Luottamuksen Rakentuminen Täydennysrakentamisen Suunnittelussa.” Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu 54 (1) Available at: http://www.yss.fi/journal/joku-palikka-siita-puuttuu-luottamuksen-rakentuminen-taydennysrakentamisen-suunnittelussa/. Accessed 3 April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., H. Gutscher, and T. C. Earle. 2005. “Perception of Risk: The Influence of General Trust, and General Confidence.” Journal of Risk Research 8 (2): 145–156. doi:10.1080/1366987032000105315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1993. “Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy.” Risk Analysis 13 (6): 675–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, P. 1999. “Values, Ideology and Politics in Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 28 (2): 161–170. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00139-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, P. 2013. “Ecological Economics in Relation to Democracy, Ideology and Politics.” Ecological Economics 95 (November): 221–225. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G., and M. Elam. 2010. “Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The ‘Participatory Turn.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (4): 198–229. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1046.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor‐Gooby, P. 2006. “Social Divisions of Trust: Scepticism and Democracy in the GM Nation? Debate.” Journal of Risk Research 9 (1): 75–95. doi:10.1080/13669870500288742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuler, S. P., and R. E. Kasperson. 2010. Social Distrust: Implications and Recommendation for Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level Radioactive Waste Management. “A Technical Report Prepared for the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear.” Future. 29th January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W., and S. S. Zmerli. 2010. “Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy—a ‘Dark Side’ of Social Capital?” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5): 631–639. doi:10.1177/0002764209350827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volland, B. 2017. “The Role of Risk and Trust Attitudes in Explaining Residential Energy Demand: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Ecological Economics 132 (February): 14–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J., Dr, N. Pidgeon, A. Weyman, and T. Horlick-Jones. 2004. “Critical Trust: understanding Lay Perceptions of Health and Safety Risk Regulation.” Health, Risk & Society 6 (2): 133–150. doi:10.1080/1369857042000219788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M.E. (ed.) 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1993. “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1): 453–486.
   Google Scholar
• Zak, P. J., and S. Knack. 2001. “Trust and Growth.” The Economic Journal 111 (470): 295–321. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. 2014. “Political Trust.” In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by A.C. Michalos. Dordrecht: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-0753-5_2202.
   Google Scholar