Digital methods of social science in food regulation: case studies from the Food Standards Agency

References

• Barons, M. J., T. C. Fonseca, A. Davis, and J. Q. Smith. 2020. “A Decision Support System for Addressing Food Security in the United Kingdom.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 185 (2): 1–24. doi:10.1111/rssa.1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blob tree. 2023. https://www.blobtree.com/pages/frontpage
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, N. B., and M. Power. 2021. “Proxy Longitudinal Indicators of Household Food Insecurity in the UK.” Emerald Open Research: 3. doi:10.35241/emeraldopenres.14311.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brick, J. M. 2011. “The Future of Survey Sampling.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (5): 872–888. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra 2021. “Consultation Outcome: Genetic Technologies Regulation Government Response.” United Kingdom Food Security Report. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., F. Hao, and M. M. Millar. 2017. “Improving the Effectiveness of Online Data Collection by Mixing Survey Modes.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, 220–238. Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman. 2020. https://medium.com/participo/engineering-for-deliberative-democracy-45f3f34f36e2
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2013. “Kitchen Life Final Report.” https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/818-1-1496_KITCHEN_LIFE_FINAL_REPORT_10-07-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2021a. “Consumer Perceptions of Genome Edited Food.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/behaviour-and-perception/consumer-perceptions-of-genome-edited-food
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2021b. “Healthy and Sustainable Diets Consumer Poll.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/wider-consumer-interests/healthy-and-sustainable-diets-consumer-poll
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2021c. “Kitchen Life 2.” https://www.food.gov.uk/other/kitchen-life-2
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2021d. “Survey of Consumer Practices with Respect to Coated Frozen Chicken Products.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/behaviour-and-perception/survey-of-consumer-practices-with-respect-to-coated-frozen-chicken-products.
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022a. “Behaviour and Perception Trends in Twitter.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/behaviour-and-perception/trends-in-twitter-conversations-about-food-during-2019-20
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022b. “Consumer Perceptions of Alternative or Novel Sources of Protein.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/behaviour-and-perception/survey-of-consumer-perceptions-of-alternative-or-novel-sources-of-protein
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022c. “The FSA Reveals that 50% of Adults Do not Always Check the Use By Date on their Food Putting Themselves and Family at Risk.” https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts/news/the-fsa-reveals-that-50-of-adults-do-not-always-check-the-use-by-date-on-their-food-putting-themselves-and-family-at-risk
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022d. “UK Publics Interests Needs and Concerns Around Food.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/wider-consumer-interests/uk-publics-interests-needs-and-concerns-around-food
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022e. “Vegetable Oil Substitution for Sunflower Oil Information for Industry and other Interested Stakeholders.” https://www.food.gov.uk/other/vegetable-oil-substitution-for-sunflower-oil-information-for-industry-and-other-interested-stakeholders
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2022f. “Vegetable Oil Substitution for Sunflower Oil- Consumer Perceptions.” https://www.food.gov.uk/other/vegetable-oil-substitution-for-sunflower-oil-information-for-industry-and-other-interested-stakeholders#consumer-perceptions
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency (FSA). 2023. “Data Catalog.” https://data.food.gov.uk/catalog
   Google Scholar
• Fox et al. 2007. http://mr.crossref.org/iPage?doi=10.1177%2F1049732306298754
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, et al. 2022. “Food and You 2: Wave 4 Technical Report.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/food-and-you-2-wave-4-technical-report-introduction
   Google Scholar
• Galvagno, M., and D. Dalli. 2014. “Theory of Value co-Creation: A Systematic Literature Review.” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 24 (6): 643–683. doi:10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187.
   Google Scholar
• Go Further. 2021. https://info.go-further.co/guides/a-guide-to-further-online-qual-platform-together-uk
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. 2013. “Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation.” In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, edited by D. Sui, S. Elwood, M. Goodchild. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos 2023. “Push to web Best Practice Guide.” https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/push-web-best-practice-guide
   Google Scholar
• Marette, S., A. C. Disdier, A. Bodnar, and J. Beghin. 2021. “New Plant Engineering Techniques, R&D Investment and International Trade.” Journal of Agricultural Economics doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S, et al. 2011. “The Behaviour Change Wheel: A New Method for Characterising and Designing Behaviour Change Interventions.” Implementation Science. 6: 42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, A. C., L. A. Ellis, T. A. Davenport, J. M. Burns, and I. B. Hickie. 2017. “Comparison of Self-Reported Telephone Interviewing and Web-Based Survey Responses: Findings from the Second Australian Young and Well National Survey.” JMIR Mental Health 4 (3): e8222. doi:10.2196/mental.8222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2012. “Great Britain.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice, edited by S. Häder, M. Häder, & M. Kühne, pp. 47–57. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• NHS. 2022. https://nhssurveys.org/surveys/survey/06-development-work/
   Google Scholar
• OFCOM. 2022. “DIgital Exclusion Review 2022.” https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/234364/digital-exclusion-review-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patel, M. 2019. Understanding people. EFSA Journal 17 (S1): e170716. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170716
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, P. 2022. “FSA 22-06-08 – The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill.”
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency. https://www.food.gov.uk/about-us/fsa-22-06-08-the-genetic-technology-precision-breeding-bill
   Google Scholar
• Renn. 1999. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es981283m.
   Google Scholar
• Savanta Group. 2023. https://savanta.com
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2022. “Distribution of Twitter Users in the United Kingdom (UK) in the 1st quarter of 2020, by Frequency of Use.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/611306/frequency-of-twitter-use-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2022. “Food Prices Are a Big Worry for Three-Quarters of Britons, Survey Finds.” https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jun/07/food-prices-uk-inflation-food-standards-agency.
   Google Scholar
• UK Data Service. 2023. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament Post. 2022. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PN-0663/POST-PN-0663.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UKSA (UK Statistics Authority). 2023. “Types of Official Statistics: What is an Official Statistic?” https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Weller, J, et al. 2021. “Kitchen Life 2: Literature Review.” https://www.food.gov.uk/research/research-projects/kitchen-life-2-literature-review
   Google Scholar