There is no prime for time: the missing link between form and concept of progressive aspect in L2 production

References

• Anderson S., T. Matlock, C. M. Fausey, and M. J. Spivey. 2008. “On the Path to Understanding On-line Processing of Grammatical Aspect.” In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC. 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos, P. 2011. “Cognitive Restructuring in Bilingualism.” In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, edited by Aneta Pavlenko, 29–65. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers, and H. J. Tily. 2013. “Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep it Maximal.” Journal of Memory and Language 68 (3): 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beek, G. van, M. Flecken, and M. Starren. 2013. “Aspectual Perspective Taking in Event Construal in L1 and L2 Dutch.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51 (2): 77–242.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, B., M. Flecken, and M. Carroll. 2013. “Progressive Attraction: On the Use and Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Dutch, Norwegian, and German.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25 (2): 95–136. doi:10.1017/S1470542713000020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. 1986. “Syntactic Persistence in Language Production.” Cognitive Psychology 18 (3): 355–387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., and W. J. M. Levelt. 1994. “Language Production: Grammatical Encoding.” In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, edited by M. A. Gernsbacher, 945–984. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., and H. Loebell. 1990. “Framing Sentences.” Cognition 35 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., H. Loebell, and R. Morey. 1992. “From Conceptual Roles to Structural Relations: Bridging the Syntactic Cleft.” Psychological Review 99 (1): 150–171. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., and M. Gullberg. 2011. “Bidirectional Cross-linguistic Influence in Event Conceptualization? Expressions of Path Among Japanese Learners of English.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., and M. Gullberg. 2013. “L1–L2 Convergence in Clausal Packaging in Japanese and English.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16 (3): 477–494. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunger, A., A. Papafragou, and J. C. Trueswell. 2013. “Event Structure Influences Language Production: Evidence from Structural Priming in Motion Event Description.” Journal of Memory and Language 69 (3): 299–323. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylund, E., and S. Jarvis. 2011. “L2 Effects on L1 Event Conceptualization.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadierno, T., and L. Ruiz. 2006. “Motion Events in Spanish L2 Acquisition.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4 (1): 183–216. doi:10.1075/arcl.4.08cad.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, M., K. Weimar, M. Flecken, M. Lambert, and C. v. Stutterheim. 2012. “Tracing Trajectories: Motion Event Construal by Advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German Speakers.” Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Language, Interaction et Acquisition 3 (2): 202–230. doi:10.1075/lia.3.2.03car.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F., K. Bock, and A. E. Goldberg. 2003. “Can Thematic Roles Leave Traces of Their Places? Cognition 90 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, A., and M. J. Pickering. 2003. “The Use of Lexical and Syntactic Information in Language Production: Evidence from the Priming of Noun-phrase Structure.” Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2): 214–230. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00060-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, O. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Flecken, M. 2011a. “Event Conceptualization by Early Bilinguals: Insights from Linguistic and Eye Tracking Data.” Bilingualism: Language & Cognition 14 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecken, M. 2011b. “What Native Speaker Judgements Tell Us About the Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Dutch.” Linguistics 49 (3): 479–524. doi:10.1515/ling.2011.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., and J. Gerwien. 2013. “Grammatical Aspect Modulates Event Duration Estimations: Findings from Dutch.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, edited by Markus Knauff, Markus Pauen, Natalie Sebanz, and Inge Wachsmuth, 2309–2314. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., J. Gerwien, M. Carroll, and C. V. Stutterheim. 2015. “Analyzing Gaze Allocation During Language Planning: A Cross-linguistic Study on Dynamic Events.” Language and Cognition 7 (1): 138–166. doi:10.1017/langcog.2014.20.
   Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., C. v. Stutterheim, and M. Carroll. 2013. “Principles of Information Organization in l2 Use: Complex Patterns of Conceptual Transfer.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51 (2): 229–242. doi:10.1515/iral-2013-0010.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z., and J. Weinstein-Tull. 2003. “Conceptual Structure Modulates Structural Priming in the Production of Complex Sentences.” Journal of Memory and Language 49 (4): 537–555. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 1998. “Studying Bilinguals: Methodological and Conceptual Issues.” Bilingualism 1 (2): 131–149. doi:10.1017/S136672899800025X.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., H. Kolk, and P. Huiskamp. 1999. “Priming Word Order in Sentence Production.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 52 (1): 129–147. doi:10.1080/713755798.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., and M. J. Pickering. 2008. “Language Integration in Bilingual Sentence Production.” Acta Psychologica 128 (3): 479–489. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., M. J. Pickering, and E. Veltkamp. 2004. “Is Syntax Separate or Shared between Languages?” Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15 (6): 409–414.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., and C. Westenberg. 2000. “Word Order Priming in Written and Spoken Sentence Production.” Cognition 75 (2): B27–B39. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00080-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, H., M. Hickmann, and A.-C. Demagny. 2008. “How Adult English Learners of French Express Caused Motion: A Comparison with English and French Natives.” Acquisition et Interaction en Langue étrangère 27: 15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ierland, S. v. 2010. “Grammatical Features Influencing Information Structure. The Case of L1 and L2 Dutch and English.” PhD thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. 2008. “Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (Transformation or Not) and Towards Logit Mixed Models.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., and A. Pavlenko. 2008. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. 1994. Time in Language. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon, H. W., E. H. Wiig, and N. P. Nielsen. 2005. Dual-dimension Naming Speed and Language Dominance Ratings by Bilingual Hispanic Adults.” Bilingual Research Journal 29 (2): 319–336. doi:10.1080/15235882.2005.10162838.
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., and M. Broersma. 2012. “Introducing LexTALE: A Quick and Valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English.” Behavior Research Methods 44 (2): 325–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., A. Roelofs, and A. S. Meyer. 1999. “A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production.” Behavioral Brain Science 22 (1): 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebell, H., and K. Bock. 2003. “Structural Priming Across Languages.” Linguistics 41 (5): 791–824. doi:10.1515/ling.2003.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, C., and R. Zwaan. 2003. “How Does Verb Aspect Constrain Event Representations?” Memory & Cognition 31 (5): 663–672. doi:10.3758/BF03196106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, Teenie. 2010. “Abstract Motion is No Longer Abstract.” Language and Cognition 2 (2): 243–260. doi:10.1515/langcog.2010.010.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. 2006. “Interaction and Syntactic Priming: English L2 Speakers’ Production of Dative Constructions.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (2): 179–207. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, P. J., and J. E. Fox Tree. 2003. “Building Syntactic Structures in Speaking: A Bilingual Exploration.” Experimental Psychology (formerly “Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie”) 50 (3): 184–195. doi:10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.184.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. 2005. “Crosslinguistic Influence and Conceptual Transfer: What are the Concepts?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 3–25. doi:10.1017/S0267190505000012.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., and H. P. Branigan. 1998. “The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 39 (4): 633–651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., and V. S. Ferreira. 2008. “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (3): 427–459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamoura, A., and J. N. Williams. 2007. “Processing Verb Argument Structure Across Languages: Evidence for Shared Representations in the Bilingual Lexicon.” Applied Psycholinguistics 28 (4): 627. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C. 2003. “Syntactic Priming of Relative Clause Attachments: Persistence of Structural Configuration in Sentence Production.” Cognition 89 (3): 179–205. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00119-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedtova, B., C. v. Stutterheim, and M. Carroll. 2011. “Implications of Language-specific Patterns in Event Construal of Advanced L2 Speakers.” In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, edited by A. Pavlenko, 66–107. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., R. J. Hartsuiker, and M. J. Pickering. 2007. “The Representation of Lexical and Syntactic Information in Bilinguals: Evidence from Syntactic Priming.” Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2): 153–171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., K. Weber, M. Cladder-Micus, and P. Hagoort. 2014. “The Influence of Verb-bound Syntactic Preferences on the Processing of Syntactic Structures.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (5): 1448–1460. doi:10.1037/a0036796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 1996. “From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking.’” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, edited by J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. v. 2003. “Linguistic Structure and Information Organisation: The Case of Very Advanced Learners.” EuroSLA Yearbook 3 (1): 183–206. doi:10.1075/eurosla.3.11stu.
   Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. v., M. Andermann, M. Carroll, M. Flecken, and B. Schmiedtova. 2012. “How Grammaticized Concepts Shape Event Conceptualization in Language Production: Insights from Linguistic Analysis, Eye Tracking Data, and Memory Performance.” Linguistics 50 (4): 833–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. v., and R. Nüse 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41, no. 5: 851–882. doi:10.1515/ling.2003.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar