The role of statistical learning in the acquisition of motion event construal in a second language

References

• Antonijević, S., and S. Berthaud. 2012. “L2 Acquisition of Verbal Constructions: Expressing Motion in L2 French and English.” In Constructions in French, edited by M. Bouveret and D. Legallois, 155–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Aske, J. 1989. “Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look.” Berkeley Linguistic Society Papers 14: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, J., B. Levin, and S. Wei Tham. 2010. “The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46 (2): 331–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. 1996. “Argument Structure and Learnability: Is a Solution in Sight?” Berkeley Linguistics Society 22: 454–468.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. K., F. Ackerman, and M. Kutas. 2012. “Adult Learners Use Both Entrenchment and Preemption to Infer Grammatical Constraints.” Paper presented at 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. K., and A. E. Goldberg. 2011. “Learning What Not to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in A-Adjective Production.” Language 87 (1): 55–83. doi:10.1353/lan.2011.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British National Corpus. 2007. Available from http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/corpus/.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, P. J., and M. Tomasello. 1999. “How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions.” Language 75 (4): 720–738. doi:10.2307/417731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. 2003. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calude, A. S., and M. Pagel. 2011. “How Do We Use Language? Shared Patterns in the Frequency of Word Use Across 17 World Languages.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 (1567): 1101–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, M., and C. von Stutterheim. 2003. “Typology and Information Organisation: Perspective Taking and Language-specific Effects in the Construal of Events.” In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, edited by A. G. Ramat, 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Amsterdam: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, S. 1996. “Movement and Direction in French and English.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. 2005. “What Makes Learning Second‐language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues.” Language Learning 55 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. J., and M. H. Long. 2008. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. 2002. “Frequency Effects in Language Processing.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 143–188.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. 2009. Native-like Selection in Second Language Acquisition: The Effects of Age, Aptitude and Socialisation. Full research report. Swindon: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., and A. Mackey. 2002. “Frequency Effects and Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Construction Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, H., and M. Hickmann. 2011. “Expressing Voluntary Motion in a Second Language: English Learners of French. In Language and Bilingual Cognition, edited by Vivian Cook and Benedetta Bassetti, 315–340. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickmann, M., and H. Hendriks. 2006. “Static and Dynamic Location in French and in English.” First Language 26 (1): 103–135.
   Google Scholar
• Hickmann, M., P. Taranne, and P. Bonnet. 2009. “Motion in First Language Acquisition: Manner and Path in French and English Child Language.” Journal of Child Language 36: 705–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionin, T., H. Ko, and K. Wexler. 2004. “Article Semantics in L2 Acquisition: The Role of Specificity.” Language Acquisition 12 (1): 3–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ionin, T., and K. Wexler. 2003. “The Certain Uses of the in L2-English.” In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, edited by Juana M. Liceras, H. Zobl, and H. Goodluck, 150–160. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., and T. Odlin. 2000. “Morphological Type, Spatial Reference, and Language Transfer.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22 (4): 535–556.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A., P. Rychly, P. Smrz, and D. Tugwell. 2004. “The Sketch Engine.” Proceedings of the 2004 Euralex Conference, Lorient, France, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and J. Hulstijn. 2001. “Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: The Construct of Task-induced Involvement.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. 2012. Input, Interaction, and Corrective Feedback in L2 Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. 2000. “The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk: Volume I: Transcription Format and Programs, Volume II: The Database.” Computational Linguistics 26 (4): 657–657.
   Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, B., and M. Gullberg. 2011. “The Role of Input Frequency and Semantic Transparency in the Acquisition of Verb Meaning: Evidence from Placement Verbs in Tamil and Dutch.” Journal of Child Language 38 (3): 504–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plauen, E. O. 1952. Vater und Sohn [Father and Son]. 2 vols. Ravensburg: Ravensburger Taschenbuch.
   Google Scholar
• Pourcel, S. 2004. “Rethinking ‘Thinking for Speaking’.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 29: 349–358.
   Google Scholar
• R development Core Team. 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., E. L. Newport, R. N. Aslin, R.A. Tunick, and S. Barrueco. 1997. “Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear.” Psychological Science 8 (2): 101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., and B. Dunham. 1999. “Exploring Native and Non-native Intuitions of Word Frequency.” Second Language Research 15 (4): 389–411.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 1996. “From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking.’” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, edited by J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. 2006. “What Makes Manner of Motion Salient? Explorations in Linguistic Typology, Discourse, and Cognition.” In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, edited by Henriëtte Hendriks and Maya Hickman, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D., and N. Hoiting. 1994. “Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages: Typological Considerations.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 487–505.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, D. 2012. “Spatial Feature Assembly in First and Second Language Acquisition.” Spatial Cognition and Computation 12 (4): 252–274. doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.568271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. 1985. “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.” Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3: 57–149.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Language, Speech, and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 2009. “The Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, edited by E. L. Bavin, 69–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trahey, M., and L. White. 1993. “Positive Evidence and Preemption in the Second Language Classroom.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (2): 181–204. doi:10.1017/S0272263100011955.
   Google Scholar
• Treffers-Daller, J., and F. Tidball. in press. “Can L2 Learners Learn New Ways to Conceptualise Events? Evidence from Motion Event Construal among English-speaking Learners of French.” In The Acquisition of French in Its Different Constellations, edited by N. Müller, K. Schmitz, and P. Guijarro-Fuentes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stutterheim, C., and R. Nuse. 2003. “Processes of Conceptualization in Language Production: Language-specific Perspectives and Event Construal.” Linguistics 41 (5): 851–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. 1991. “Adverb Placement in Second Language Acquisition: Some Effects of Positive and Negative Evidence in the Classroom.” Second Language Research 7 (2): 133–161. doi:10.1177/026765839100700205.
   Google Scholar