Academic achievement of students in dual language immersion

References

• Adesope, O. O., T. Lavin, T. Thompson, and C. Ungerleider. 2010. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive Correlates of Bilingualism.” Review of Educational Research 80: 207–245. doi: 10.3102/0034654310368803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanis, I. 2000. “A Texas Two-Way Bilingual Program: Its Effects on Linguistic and Academic Achievement.” Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education 24 (3): 225–248. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2000.10162763
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. 1991. “Metalinguistic Dimensions of Bilingual Language Proficiency.” In Language Processing in Bilingual Children, edited by E. Bialystok, 113–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., and F. I. Craik. 2010. “Cognitive and Linguistic Processing in the Bilingual Mind.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 19 (1): 19–23. doi: 10.1177/0963721409358571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., F. I. Craik, D. I. Green, and T. H. Gollan. 2009. “Bilingual Minds.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 10 (3): 89–129. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bialystok, E., and S. Majumder. 1998. “The Relationship Between Bilingualism and the Development of Cognitive Processes in Problem Solving.” Applied Psycholinguistics 19 (1): 69–58. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400010584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournot-Trites, M., and K. Reeder. 2001. “Interdependence Revisited: Mathematics Achievement in an Intensified French Immersion Program.” The Canadian Modern Language Review 58 (1): 27–43. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.58.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., et al. 2016. Dual Language Education Programs: Current State Policies and Practices. American Institutes for Research. http://www.air.org/resource/dual-language-education-programs-current-state-policies-and-practices
   Google Scholar
• Christian, D. 1996. “Two-Way Immersion Education: Students Learning Through Two Languages.” The Modern Language Journal 80 (1): 66–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01139.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., and M. Swain. 1976. “Bilingual Education: The Immersion Model in the North American Context.” TESOL Quarterly 10 (1): 45–53. doi: 10.2307/3585938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, V. P., and W. P. Thomas. 2004. “The Astounding Effectiveness of Dual Language Education for All.” NABE Journal of Research and Practice 2 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, A. G., and L. Baker-Ward. 2013. “Dual-Language Education for Low-Income Children: Preliminary Evidence and Benefits for Executive Function.” Bilingual Research Journal 36 (3): 295–310. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2013.837848
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, T. W., and D. J. Tedick, eds. 2008. Pathways to Multilingualism. Evolving Perspectives on Immersion Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, J. G., and V. A. Mann. 2014. “Bilingual Children Show Advantages in Nonverbal Auditory Executive Function Task.” International Journal of Bilingualism 18 (6): 717–729. doi: 10.1177/1367006912472263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. R., N. Olague, and D. Rogers. 2003. The Dual Language Program Planner: A Guide for Designing and Implementing Dual Language Programs. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaruk, W. 2007. “Linguistic, Academic, and Cognitive Benefits of French Immersion.” The Canadian Modern Language Review 63 (5): 605–627. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.5.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, J., and R. Cook. 2015. “Utah: Making Immersion Mainstream.” In Building Bilingual Education Systems, edited by P. Mehisto and F. Genesee, 83–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., J. Steele, R. Slater, M. Bacon, and T. Miller. 2016. “Teaching Practices and Language Use in Two-Way Dual Language Immersion Programs in a Large Public School District.” International Multilingual Research Journal 10 (1): 31–43. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2016.1118669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, K. J., and Z. Aclan. 1991. “Bilingual Proficiency as a Bridge to Academic Achievement: Results from Bilingual/Immerison Programs.” The Journal of Education 173 (2): 99–113. doi: 10.1177/002205749117300208
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K., and N. Block. 2010. “Achievement in Predominantly Low SES/Hispanic Dual Language Schools.” International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education 13 (1): 43–60. doi: 10.1080/13670050902777546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K., and F. Genesee. 2014. “Student Outcomes in One-Way and Two-Way Immersion and Indigenous Language Education.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 2 (2): 165–180. doi: 10.1075/jicb.2.2.01lin
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K., and E. R. Howard. 2008. “Language Development and Academic Achievement in Two-Way Immersion Programs.” In Pathways to Multilingualism: Evolving Perspectives on Immersion Education, edited by T. W. Fortune and D. J. Tedick, 177–200. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm-Leary, K., and A. Hernandez. 2011. “Achievement and Language Proficiency of Latino Students in Dual Language Programmes: Native English Speakers, Fluent English/Previous ELLs, and Current ELLs.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 32 (6): 531–545. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2011.611596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., A. Shook, and S. R. Schroeder. 2013. “Bilingual Two-Way Immersion Programs Benefit Academic Achievement.” Bilingual Research Journal 36: 167–86. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2013.818075
   Google Scholar
• Met, M. 2008. “Paying Attention to Language: Literacy, Language and Academic Achievement.” In Pathways to Multilingualism: Evolving Perspectives on Immersion Education, edited by T. W. Fortune and D. J. Tedick, 49–70. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, A. M., L. Fan, Z. Xu, and D. Silva. 2013. “A Mandarin/English Two-Way Immersion Program: Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement.” Foreign Language Annals 46 (4): 661–679. doi: 10.1111/flan.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peal, E., and W. E. Lambert. 1962. “The Relationship of Bilingualism to Intelligence.” Psychological Monographs 76 (27): 1–23. doi: 10.1037/h0093840
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., A. S. Bryk, and R. Congdon. 2004. HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, J., B. Slater, G. Zamarro, T. Miller, J. Li, S. Burkhauser, and M. Bacon. 2015. The Effect of Dual-Language Immersion on Student Achievement: Evidence from Lottery Data. University of Arkansas. http://www.uaedreform.org/working-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. 2010. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.” Statistical Science 25 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1214/09-STS313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1982. Evaluating Blingual Education: A Canadian Case Study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, K., Z. Mayne, and J. Watzinger-Tharp. 2015. Dual Language Program Participation. Utah Education Policy Center, University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., and V. P. Collier. 1997. School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students. University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://crede.berkeley.edu/research/llaa/1.1_final.html.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., and V. P. Collier. 2002. A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students” Long-Term Academic Achievement. University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/65j213pt.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., and V. P. Collier. 2012. Dual Language Education for a Transformed World. Albuquerque, NM: Dual Language Education of New Mexico-Fuente Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, M., S. Lapkin, and D. Hart. 2001. “Grade 3 Immersion Students” Performance in Literacy and Mathematics: Province-Wide Results from Ontario 1998–99.” Canadian Modern Language Review 58 (1): 9–26. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.58.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar