Exploring translanguaging in CLIL

References

• Adamson, J., and N. Fujimoto-Adamson. 2012. “Translanguaging in Self-access Language Advising: Informing Language Policy.” Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 3 (1): 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Agolli, R. 2015. “Content and Language Symbiosis in a Maieutic, Translanguaging Pattern (CLSL): An Exploratory Practice in Italy.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 8 (1): 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P., ed. 1998. Code-Switching in Interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. 2000. The Care and Education of Young Bilinguals. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, P. 2008. “An Example of Mainstream CLIL in France: Sections Européennes et de Langue Orientale.” In CLIL e l'Apprendimento delle Lingue. Le Sfide del Nuovo Ambiente di Apprendimento, edited by C. M. Coonan, 233–238. Venice, Italy: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A., and A. Creese, eds. 2014. Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2012. “Supervernaculars and Their Dialects.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., and B. Rampton. 2011. “Language and Super Diversity.” Diversities 13 (2): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Breidbach, S., and B. Viebrock, eds. 2013. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe: Research Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, F. B., and R. Donato. 1994. “Vygotskyan Approaches to Understanding Foreign Language Learner Discourse During Communicative Tasks.” Hispania 77: 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2015a. “‘Content-Based Instruction and Content and Language Integrated Learning: The Same or Different?’ Language.” Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. 2015b. “Discussion: Some Reflections on Content-Based Education in Hong Kong as Part of the Paradigm Shift.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (3): 345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (5): 242–262.
   Google Scholar
• Chimbutane, F. 2014. “Codeswitching in L1 and L2 Learning Contexts: Insights from a Study of Teacher Beliefs and Practices in Mozambican Bilingual Education Programmes.” Language and Education 27 (4): 314–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2000. “The Language of Classroom Interaction and Learning.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities. Functional Linguistics Perspectives, edited by L. Unsworth, 184–205. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creese, A., and A. Blackledge. 2010. “Translanguaging in the Bilingual Classroom: A Pedagogy for Learning and Teaching?” The Modern Language Journal 94 (1): 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromdal, J. 2004. “Building Bilingual Oppositions: Code-Switching in Children’s Disputes.” Language in Society 33 (1): 33–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. “Outcomes and Processes in CLIL: Current Research from Europe.” In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, edited by W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann, 139–157. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., A. Llinares, F. Lorenzo, and T. Nikula. 2014. ““You Can Stand under My Umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee and Gorter (2013).” Applied Linguistics 35 (2): 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 46: 545–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. E., and Z. Dörnyei. 1998. Interpersonal Dynamics in Second Language Education: The Visible and Invisible Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, F., and G. Colohan. 2014. “T(W)O and Fro: Using the L1 as a Language Teaching Tool in the CLIL Classroom.” Language Learning Journal. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.947382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, O. 2009. Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García, O. 2012. “Theorizing Translanguaging for Educators.” In Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB Guide for Educators, edited by C. Celic and K. Seltzer, 1–6. New York: CUNY-NYSIEB.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., and W. Li. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gené Gil, M. G., M. J. Garau, and J. Salazar Noguera. 2012. “A Case Study Exploring the Language Choice Between the Target Language and the L1s in Mainstream CLIL and EFL Secondary Education.” Revista de Lingüística Y Lenguas Aplicadas 7: 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gierlinger, E. 2015. “‘You Can Speak German, Sir’: On the Complexity of Teachers’ L1 Use in CLIL.” Language and Education. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1023733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F. 1989. “Neurolinguists, Beware! The Bilingual Is Not Two Monolinguals in One Person.” Brain and Language 36: 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G., and G. Cook. 2012. “Own-Language Use in Language Teaching and Learning: State of the Art.” Language Teaching 45 (3): 271–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, M. 1997. “Behind Classroom Code Switching: Layering and Language Choice in L2 Learner Interaction.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (2): 217–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hélot, C. 2014. “Rethinking Bilingual Pedagogy in Alsace: Translingual Writers and Translanguaging.” In Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy, edited by A. Blackledge and A. Creese, 217–237. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hlavac, J. 2006. “Bilingual Discourse Markers: Evidence from Croatian–English Code-Switching.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (11): 1870–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, J. N., M. S. Karrebæk, L. M. Madsen, and J. S. Møller. 2011. “Polylanguaging in Superdiversity.” Diversities 13 (2): 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kontio, J., and L. K. Sylvén. 2015. “Language Alternation and Language Norm in Vocational Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Language Learning Journal 43 (3): 271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2013. “The Use of the L1 in CLIL Classes: The Teachers’ Perspective.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 6 (2): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and J. M. Sierra. 2010. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” ELT Journal 64 (4): 367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone, A. R. 2015. “ Outlooks in Italy: CLIL as Language Education Policy.” Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 30 (1). http://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol30/iss1/3.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G., B. Jones, and C. Baker. 2012a. “Translanguaging: Origins and Development from School to Street and Beyond.” Educational Research and Evaluation 18 (7): 641–654.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G., B. Jones, and C. Baker. 2012b. “Translanguaging: Developing Its Conceptualisation and Contextualisation.” Educational Research and Evaluation 18 (7): 655–670.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W. 2011. “Moment Analysis and Translanguaging Space: Discursive Construction of Identities by Multilingual Chinese Youth in Britain.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1222–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. 2015. “Conceptualising the Potential Role of L1 in CLIL.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W., and B. Yu. 2011. “First Language and Target Language in the Foreign Language Classroom.” Language Teaching 44 (1): 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., and R. Whittaker. 2007. “Talking and Writing in a Foreign Language in a CLIL Context: A Linguistic Analysis of Secondary School Learners of Geography and History.” In Models and Practice in CLIL, edited by F. Lorenzo, S. Casal, V. Alba-Quiñones, and P. Moore, 83–94. La Rioja: RESLA.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and A. M. Y. Lin. 2015. “Designing Multilingual and Multimodal CLIL Frameworks for EFL Students.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (3): 261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. 2006. “Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the Theoretical Framework.” Modern Language Journal 90 (3): 320–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makalela, L. 2013. “Translanguaging in Kasi-taal: Rethinking Old Language Boundaries for New Language Planning.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 42: 111–125.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE - The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Jyväskylä: UniCOM Continuing Education Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and G. Langé, eds. 1999. Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning: A Research-Driven Foundation Reader, TIE-CLIL. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., P. Mehisto, D. Wolff, and M. J. Frigols Martin. 2011. European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. 2014. ““What Do You Want to Say?” How Adolescents Use Translanguaging to Expand Learning Opportunities.” International Multilingual Research Journal. doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.914372.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez-García, M. C., and V. Pavón. 2012. “Investigating the Coexistence of the Mother Tongue and the Foreign Language Through Teacher Collaboration in CLIL Contexts: Perceptions and Practice of the Teachers Involved in the Plurilingual Programme in Andalusia.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (5): 573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P., and T. Nikula. 2016. “Translanguaging in CLIL.” In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, edited by T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore and U. Smit. 211–234. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2005. “English as an Object and Tool of Study in Classrooms: Interactional Effects and Pragmatic Implications.” Linguistics and Education 16 (1): 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2007. “Speaking English in Finnish Content-Based Classrooms.” World Englishes 26 (2): 206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, P. Moore, and U. Smit. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., and K. Mård-Miettinen. 2014. “Language Learning in Immersion and CLIL Classrooms.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 18, edited by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Orman, J. 2013. “New Lingualisms, Same Old Codes.” Language Sciences 37: 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuji, E., and A. Pennycook. 2010. “Metrolingualism: Fixity, Fluidity and Language in Flux.” International Journal of Multilingualism 7 (3): 240–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., and A. Asli. 2014. “Bilingual Teachers’ Language Strategies: The Case of an Arabic-Hebrew Kindergarten in Israel.” Teaching and Teacher Education 38: 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, T., and J. Surmont. 2012. “CLIL and Immersion: How Clear Cut Are They?” ELT Journal 66 (1): 113–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N., and G. Wigglesworth. 2003. “Is There a Role for the Use of the L1 in an L2 Setting?” TESOL Quarterly 37 (4): 760–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L. 2002. “Bilingual Discourse Markers in Puerto Rican Spanish.” Language in Society 31 (1): 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. 2013. “CLIL in Australia: The Importance of Context.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (4): 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstünel, E., and P. Seedhouse. 2005. “Why That, in That Language, Right Now? Code-Switching and Pedagogical Focus.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (3): 302–324.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. 2002. Extending Bilingualism in the Education System. Report presented to the Welsh Assembly. http://www.assemblywales.org/3c91c7af00023d820000595000000000.pdf.
   Google Scholar