Contributions of tracking, literacy skills, and attitudes to science achievement of students with varied English proficiency

References

• Ardasheva, Y., K. J. Carbonneau, A. K. Roo, and Z. Wang. 2018. “Relationships among Prior Learning, Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Science Vocabulary Learning of Middle School Students with Varied English Language Proficiency.” Learning and Individual Differences 61: 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., J. B. Firestone, R. Lamb, and S. N. Newcomer. 2016. “Contributions of Strategies, Self-efficacy, and General and Technical Vocabulary to Science Reading Comprehension among ELs.” Roundtable presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Washington, DC, April.
   Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., S. N. Newcomer, J. B. Firestone, and R. Lamb. 2017. “Mediation in the Relationship among EL Status, Vocabulary, and Science Reading Comprehension.” The Journal of Educational Research 110 (6): 665–674. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., L. Norton-Meier, and B. Hand. 2015. “Negotiation, Embeddedness, and Non-Threatening Learning Environments as Themes of Science and Language Convergence for English Language Learners.” Studies in Science Education 51 (2): 201–249. doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1078019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardasheva, Y., and T. R. Tretter. 2017. “Developing Science-Specific, Technical Vocabulary of High-School Newcomer English Learners.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20 (3): 252–271. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1042356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, D., E. H. Hiebert, and D. P. Pearson. 2011. “The Effects of Syntactic and Lexical Complexity on the Comprehension of Elementary Science Texts.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 4 (1): 107–125. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/216.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2008. Content Assessment in Intelligent Computer-aided Language Learning: Meaning Error Diagnosis for English as a Second Language. (Electronic dissertation). https://etd.ohiolink.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28: 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. E., E. G. Merritt, and S. E. Rimm-Kaufman. 2014. “Examining Math and Science Self-efficacy and Anxiety in Fifth Grade English Learners.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I., M. G. McKeown, and L. Kucan. 2013. Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2008. What’s Math Got to Do with It?: Helping Children Learn to Love their Most Hated Subject—and Why It’s Important for America. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Braden, S., B. A. Wassell, K. Scantlebury, and A. Grover. 2016. “Supporting Language Learners in Science Classrooms: Insights from Middle-School English Language Learner Students.” Language and Education 30 (5): 438–458. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1134566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, B., Y. Cho, and S. DiPietro. 2016. “Predicting Grades from an English Language Assessment: The Importance of Peeling the Onion.” Language Testing 33 (3): 307–318. doi:10.1177/0265532215583066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, S. L. 2008. “Motivation in High School Science Students: A Comparison of Gender Differences in Life, Physical, and Earth Science Classes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45: 955–970. doi:10.1002/tea.20249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, S. L., and F. Pajares. 2006. “Sources of Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Middle School Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (5): 485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., and K. Ryoo. 2008. “Teaching Science as a Language: A “Content-First” Approach to Science Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (5): 529–553. doi:10.1002/tea.20255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, C., and O. Lee. 2014. “English Learners in Science Education.” In Handbook of Research in Science Education, edited by N. G. Lederman and S. K. Abell, 204–223. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. 2005. “Tracking and High School English Learners: Limiting Opportunity to Learn.” American Educational Research Journal 42 (2): 305–328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, R., and D. Shifrer. 2016. “Equitable Access for Secondary English Learner Students: Course Taking as Evidence of EL Program Effectiveness.” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (3): 463–496. doi:10.1177/0013161X16648190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., E. H. Hiebert, P. D. Pearson, and N. McClung. 2015. “Factors that Influence the Difficulty of Science Words.” Journal of Literacy Research 47 (2): 153–185. doi:10.1177/1086296X15615363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. K., and E. Rudowicz. 2003. “Academic Outcomes of Ability Grouping among Junior High School Students in Hong Kong.” The Journal of Educational Research 96 (4): 241–254. doi:10.1080/00220670309598813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. 2000. “A New Academic Word List.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (2): 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deygers, B., K. Van den Branden, and K. Van Gorp. 2017. “University Entrance Language Tests: A Matter of Justice.” Language Testing. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/0265532217706196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. 1993. “Toward an Epistemology of Physics.” Cognition and Instruction 10 (2–3): 105–225. doi:10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. 2008. “A ‘Theory Bite’ on the Meaning of Scientific Inquiry: A Companion to Kuhn and Pease.” Cognition and Instruction 26 (4): 560–566. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27739895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. E., and E. A. De Avila. 1994. Language Assessment Scale (LAS-O). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., and G. C. Wolniak. 2013. “College Student Pathways to the STEM Disciplines.” Teachers College Record 115 (1): 1–27. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=16740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, X., and T. Gallagher. 2014. “Morphological Development Levels of Science Content Vocabulary: Implications for Science-Based Texts in Elementary Classrooms.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (6): 1407–1423. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9470-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford-Connors, E., and J. R. Paratore. 2015. “Vocabulary Instruction in Fifth Grade and Beyond: Sources of Word Learning and Productive Contexts for Development.” Review of Educational Research 85 (1): 50–91. doi:10.3102/0034654314540943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabig, C. S., and E. Zaretsky. 2013. “Promoting Morphological Awareness in Children with Language Needs: Do the Common Core State Standards Pave the Way?” Topics in Language Disorders 33 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., J. Behney, and L. Plonsky. 2013. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. 4th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, M. S., S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, E. G. Merritt, and C. L. Patton. 2013. “The Responsive Classroom Approach and Fifth Grade Students’ Math and Science Anxiety and Self-Efficacy.” School Psychology Quarterly 28 (4): 360–373. doi:10.1037/spq0000026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, F. H. 2016. “A Longitudinal Study of Middle and Secondary Level Science Textbook Vocabulary Loads.” School Science and Mathematics 116 (6): 320–325. doi:10.1111/ssm.12183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., and J. Ireson. 2005. “Secondary School Teachers’ Pedagogic Practices when Teaching Mixed and Structured Ability Classes.” Research Papers in Education 20 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1080/0267152052000341318.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. M., W. B. Hedrick, and K. D. Wood. 2005. “Research on Vocabulary Instruction in the Content Areas: Implications for Struggling Readers.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 21 (3): 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., and G. N. Cervetti. 2012. “What Differences in Narrative and Informational Texts Mean for Learning and Instruction of Vocabulary.” In Vocabulary Instruction: Research Into Practice, 2nd ed., edited by E. J. Kam’enui and J. F. Baumann, 322–344. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., A. P. Goodwin, and G. N. Cervetti. 2017. “Core Vocabulary: It’s Morphological Content and Presence Exemplar Texts.” Reading Research Quarterly. doi:10.1002/rrq.183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, L., K. Rogers, and C. Henderson. 2003. The World of Plants, 54–56. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and P. Tse. 2007. “Is There an ‘Academic Vocabulary’?” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 235–253. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachchaf, R., T. Noble, A. Rosebery, C. O’Connor, B. Warren, and Y. Wang. 2016. “A Closer Look at Linguistic Complexity: Pinpointing Individual Linguistic Features of Science Multiple-Choice Items Associated with English language Learner Performance.” Bilingual Research Journal 39 (2): 152–166. doi:10.1080/15235882.2016.1169455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno, Y., and J. G. Cromley. 2013. “English Language Learners’ Access to and Attainment in Postsecondary Education.” TESOL Quarterly 47 (1): 89–121. doi:10.1002/tesq.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupermintz, H. 2002. “Affective and Conative Factors as Aptitude Resources in High School Science Achievement.” Educational Assessment 8: 123–137. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0802_03.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Alecio, R., F. Tong, B. J. Irby, C. Guerrero, M. Huerta, and Y. Fan. 2012. “The Effect of an Instructional Intervention on Middle School English Learners’ Science and English Reading Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (8): 987–1011. doi:10.1002/tea.21031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., S. Fradd, and F. X. Sutman. 1995. “Science Knowledge and Cognitive Strategy Use among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (8): 797–816. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 2002. “Multimedia Semiotics: Genres for Science Education and Scientific Literacy.” In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, edited by M. J. Schleppegrell and M. C. Colombi, 21–44. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N., M. Kieffer, S. Faller, and J. Kelley. 2010. “The Effectiveness and Ease of Implementation of an Academic Vocabulary Intervention for Linguistically Diverse Students in Urban Middle Schools.” Reading Research Quarterly 45 (2): 196–228. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., M. J. Kieffer, J. G. Kelley, and J. R. Harris. 2014. “Effects of Academic Vocabulary Instruction for Linguistically Diverse Adolescents: Evidence from a Randomized Field Trial.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (6): 1159–1194. doi:10.3102/0002831214532165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, E. G., S. Tolbert, J. Solís, P. Stoddart, and G. C. Bunch. 2016. Secondary Science Teaching for English Learners: Developing Supportive and Responsive Learning Contexts for Sense-Making and Language Development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• May, D. K. 2009. Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire. (Doctoral dissertation.) University of Georgia, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Melguizo, T., and G. C. Wolniak. 2012. “The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields among High Achieving Minority Students.” Research in Higher Education 53 (4): 383–405. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., M. L. Maehr, L. Z. Hruda, E. Anderman, L. Anderman, K. E. Freeman, and T. Urdan. 2000. Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. 2009. “Teaching Refugee Learners with Interrupted Education in Science: Vocabulary, Literacy and Pedagogy.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (4): 571–592. doi:10.1080/09500690701744611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E. 1988. Teaching Vocabulary to Improve Reading Comprehension. Newark, DL: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., and D. Townsend. 2012. “Words as Tools: Learning Academic Vocabulary as Language Acquisition.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (1): 91–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41330887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, X. A. 2010. “End-of-High-School Mathematics Attainment: How Did Students Get There.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1064–1095. http://www.tcrecord.org/library/content.asp?contentid=15660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 2005. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., S. L. Britner, and G. Valiante. 2000. “Relation Between Achievement Goals and Self-Beliefs of Middle School Students in Writing and Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 406–422. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, M. 1999. Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters, 7–9. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. 2002. “Some Key Factors Affecting English Learners’ Development of Advanced Literacy.” In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, edited by M. J. Schleppegrell and M. C. Colombi, 209–226. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., D. Schmitt, and C. Clapham. 2001. “Developing and Exploring the Behavior of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test.” Language Testing 18: 55–88. doi:10.1177/026553220101800103.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., D. Jamieson-Noel, and M. Asselin. 2003. “Vocabulary Instruction Throughout the Day in Twenty-three Canadian Upper-elementary Classrooms.” The Elementary School Journal 103 (3): 269–286. doi:10.1086/499726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. A. 2007. “Striving for Equitable Classroom Assessments for Linguistic Minorities: Strategies for and Effects of Revising Life Science Items.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (6): 864–881. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 1990. “Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Response to Hallinan.” Review of Educational Research 60 (3): 505–507. doi:10.3102/00346543060003505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. 2010. “Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading and Learning about Science.” Science 328 (5977): 450–452. doi:10.1126/science.1182597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., J. F. Lawrence, and C. White. 2009. “Generating Knowledge of Academic Language Among Urban Middle School Students.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 2 (4): 325–344. doi:10.1080/19345740903167042.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, A. 2012. “Relationships of General Vocabulary, Science Vocabulary, and Student Questioning with Science Comprehension in Students with Varying Levels of English Proficiency.” Instructional Science 40 (6): 901–923. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, F., B. G. Irby, R. Lara-Alecio, and J. Koch. 2014. “Integrating Literacy and Science for English Language Learners: From Learning-to-Read to Reading-to-Learn.” The Journal of Educational Research 107 (5): 410–426. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.833072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D., D. Bear, S. Templeton, and A. Burton. 2016. “The Implications of Adolescents’ Academic Word Knowledge for Achievement and Instruction.” Reading Psychology 37 (8): 1119–1148. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1193579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D., and P. Collins. 2009. “Academic Vocabulary and Middle School English Learners: An Intervention Study.” Reading and Writing 22 (9): 993–1019. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D., A. Filippini, P. Collins, and G. Biancarosa. 2012. “Evidence for the Importance of Academic Word Knowledge for the Academic Achievement of Diverse Middle School Students.” The Elementary School Journal 112 (3): 497–518. doi:10.1086/663301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umansky, I. M. 2016. “Leveled and Exclusionary Tracking: English Learners’ Access to Academic Content in Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (6): 1792–1833. doi:10.3102/0002831216675404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orman, D. S. J., Y. Ardasheva, and K. J. Carbonneau. 2018. “Effectiveness of Extended Vocabulary Instruction on Vocabulary Learning and Science Reading Comprehension in Mixed-English-Proficiency Classrooms.” Roundtable accepted at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York, NY, April.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. A., and K. J. Chavez. 2014. Reading and Representing across the Content Areas: A Classroom Guide. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., D. Pimm, and H.-L. Tuan. 2007. “The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5 (4): 559–589. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4.
   Google Scholar
• Zuniga, K., J. K. Olson, and M. Winter. 2005. “Science Education for Rural Latino/a Students: Course Placement and Success in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (4): 376–402. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar