Co-constructing meaning in international meetings – an approach to plurilingual interactions

References

• Araújo e Sá, H. 1993. “Je connais tes difficultés et j’en fais mon discours ou l’autorégulation du discours de l’enseignant d’après la représentation des difficultés d’apprentissage.” Association des Chercheurs et Enseignants Didacticiens des Langues Etrangères (ACEDLE), Les Pratiques de Classe en Langue Étrangère. Discours Descriptifs, Outils d’Analyse, Normes et Evolutions, Facteurs de Variation, 211–246. Saint-Cloud: Ecole Normale Supérieure de Saint-Cloud.
   Google Scholar
• Auchlin, A. 1990. “Analyse du discours et bonheur conversationnel.” Cahiers de Linguistique française 11: 311–328.
   Google Scholar
• Auchlin, A. 1991. “Le bonheur conversationnel: fondements, enjeux et domaines.” Cahiers de Linguistique française 12: 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Auchlin, A. 1996. “Bonheur conversationnel et qualité du discours: pour une approche expérientielle et systémique de la compétence discursive.” Langage et Pratiques, Lausanne (Bulletin de l’ARLD), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Balboni, P. 2007. “Dall’intercomprensione all’intercomunicazione romanza.” In Diálogos em Intercompreensão, edited by F. Capucho, A. Alves, P. Martins, C. Degache, and M. Tost, 447–459. Lisboa: Universidade Católica.
   Google Scholar
• Balboni, P. 2009. “Per una glottodidattica dell’intercomunicazione romanza.” In Orale e intercomprensione tra lingue romanze. Ricerche e implicazioni didattiche, Atti della giornata di studio del 7 dicembre 2006, edited by M. C. Jamet, 197–203. Venezia: Cafoscarina Editrice/Do.Ri.F.-università e Università Ca’Foscari.
   Google Scholar
• Balboni, P. 2010. “Esiste un’attitudine all’intercomunicazione?” In Lernerautonomie durch Interkomprehension: Projekte und Perspektiven, edited by P. Doyé and F.-J. Meissner, 17–28. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Berthoud, A.-C., F. Grin, and G. Lüdi, eds. 2013. Exploring the Dynamics of Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Braunmüller, K. 2007. “Receptive Multilingualism in Northern Europe in the Middle Ages: A Description of a Scenario.” In Receptive Multilingualism: Hamburg Studies in Multilingualism , 6, edited by J. D. ten Thije and L. Zeevaert, 25–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabedo, A. 2007. “Marcas prosódias del registro coloquial en la conversación.” CAUCE Revista Internacional de filologia y su didáctica 30: 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Capucho, M. F. 2011. “Cooperating and Innovating – Redinter, Working Together for the Implementation of Intercomprehension Methodologies.” In International Conference “The Future of Education” – Conference Proceedings, edited by Firenze Pixel. http://www.pixel-online.net/edu_future/conferenceproceedings.php.
   Google Scholar
• Capucho, M. F. 2012a. “L’Intercompréhension – un nouvel atout dans le monde professionnel.” In Actes du colloque IC2012. Intercompréhension : compétences plurielles, corpus, intégration, edited by Ch. Degache and S. Garbarino, Université Stendhal Grenoble 3 (France). http://ic2012.u-grenoble3.fr/OpenConf/papers/67.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Capucho, F. 2012b. “L’intercompréhension: l’innovation déclinée au passé, au présent et au future.” Rev. Redinter- Intercompreensão 3: 15–36. Ed. Cosmos, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Capucho, F. 2016. “Applied Linguistics in Intercultural Communication: A Plural Approach for Multidimensional Processes.” In Research Papers on Teaching English as an Additional Language, edited by I. H. Mirici, I. H. Erten, H. Oz, and H. Vodopija-Krstanoviá, 31–60. Rijeka: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka.
   Google Scholar
• Charaudeau, P. 1995. “Le dialogue dans un modèle de discours.” Cahiers de Linguistique Française 17: 141–178.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Final Report – High Level Group on Multilingualism. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/lang/doc/multireport_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davignon, E., ed. 2008. Languages Mean Business – Companies Work Better with Languages – Recommendations from the Business Forum for Multilingualism Established by the European Commission. Brussels: DG Education & Culture.
   Google Scholar
• De Carlo, M. 2013. “Réflexions sur une compétence difficile à cerner: le savoir être. Tentative de déclinaison à la lumière du concept de reconnaissance.” ELA, n° 169 edited by J-M Robert, 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fincke, S. 1999. “The Syntactic Organization of Repair in Bikol.” In Cognition and Function in Language, edited by B. Fox, D. Jurafsky, and L. Michaelis, 252–267. Stanford: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B., H. Makoto, and R. Jasperson. 1996. “Resources and Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, and S. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frath, P. 2010. “Should the World Rely on English as a Lingua Franca?” In Current Trends in SLA Research and Language Teaching. Proceedings of the 6th International ELT Research Conference, edited by D. Höksal, I. Erten, E. Zehir Topkaya, and A. Yavuz, 290–295. Çannakale: Çannakale Onsekiz Mart University.
   Google Scholar
• Gajo, L., and G. Steffen. 2014. “Science et plurilinguisme: savoirs et perspectives en tension.” In Repenser le rôle des pratiques langagières dans la constitution des espaces sociaux contemporains, edited by A.-C. Berthoud and M. Burger, 107–124. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., and Li Wei. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre/Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, F. 2008. “The Oligarchic Temptation and its Dangers.” In Proceedings of the International Symposium on – Situció I perspectives del plurilingüisme a Europa, edited by J. Palomero, Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua, 6–8 November. http://www.unige.ch/traduction-interpretation/recherches/groupes/elf/documents/elfwp7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haberland, H., D. Lonsmann, and B. Preisler, eds. 2015. Multilingual Encounters in Europe’s Institutional Spaces. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hédiard, M. 2009. “De l’intercompréhension à l’interproduction: impact des usages langagiers en langue maternelle.” In A intercompreensão em línguas românicas. Conceitos, práticas, formação, edited by M. H. Araújo e Sá, R. Hidalgo Downing, S. Melo-Pfeifer, A. Séré, and C. Vela Delfa, 213–223. Aveiro: Oficina Digital.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, A. 2006. “Estrutura e Intepretación en la conversación coloquial: El papel del componente prosódico.” Revista de Filología 24: 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2006. Análise da conversação: Princípios e Métodos. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. Z. 2001. “Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in Inter- and Intracultural Dyadic Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 20: 259–284. doi: 10.1177/0261927X01020003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdi, G. 2014. “Le monde économique parle-t-il vraiment anglais? Les pratiques langagières dans le domaine des entreprises.” In Repenser le rôle des pratiques langagières dans la constitution des espaces sociaux contemporains, edited by A.-C. Berthoud and M. Burger, 17–34. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Maalouf, A. 2008. A Rewarding Challenge. How the Multiplicity of Languages Could Strengthen Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/archive/doc/maalouf/report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meierkord, C. 2000. “Interpreting Successful Lingua Franca Interaction. An Analysis of Non-native/Non-native small Talk Conversations in English.” In Conversation Analysis: New Developments, edited by A. Fetzer, and K. Pittner. Linguistics Online, 5 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Murata, K. 1994. “Intrusive or Cooperative? A Cross-cultural Study of Interruption.” Journal of Pragmatics 21: 385–400. http://doi.org/bvm9jk. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel, C., M. Wlodarczak, A. Tarasov, N. Campbell, and P. Wagner. 2012. “Context Cues for Classification of Competitive and Collaborative Overlaps.” Speech Prosody conference. Conference papers. Dublin: Dublin Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Orban, L. 2008. The Contribution of Multilingualism/Language Learning to Intercultural Dialogue. Address to the Informal Conference of European Ministers of Education, Oslo, June 6.  http://www.europakommisjonen.no/commissioner/orban_oslo060608.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Postma, A. 1991. Stuttering and Self-correction: On the Role of Linguistic Repair Processes in Disfluencies of Normal Speakers and Stutterers. Nijmegen: Nici.
   Google Scholar
• Roulet, E., L. Filliettaz, and A. Grobet. 2001. Un Modèle et un Instrument d’analyse de l’Organisation du Discours. Berne: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50, 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 1997. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. doi: 10.1080/01638539709545001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 205–243. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.2.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, E., and H. Zhu. 2010. “Accommodating Towards the Audience. Do Native Speakers of English Know How to Accommodate Their Communication Strategies Towards Non-native Speakers of English?” Journal of Business Communication 47 (4): 477–504. doi: 10.1177/0021943610377308
   Google Scholar
• Uhmann, S. 2001. “Some Arguments for the Relevance of Syntax to Same-sentence Self-repair in Everyday German Conversation.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by E. Couper Kuhlen and M. Selting, 373–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, W. J., M. Krzyzanowski, and R. Wodak. 2014. Multilingual Encounters in Europe’s Institutional Spaces. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Varonis, E., and S. Gass. 1985. “Non-native/Non-native Conversation: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning.” Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 71–90. doi: 10.1093/applin/6.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinagre, M. 2005. El cambio de código en la conversación bilingüe: la alternancia de lenguas. Barcelona: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L. 2011. “Moment Analysis and Translanguaging Space: Discursive Construction of Identities by Multilingual Chinese Youth in Britain.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1222–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. 1st ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. 2002. “Framing Constructivism in Practice as Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers.” Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 131–175. doi: 10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. 2001. “Visualizing Spoken Discourse: Prosodic Form and Discourse Functions of Interruptions.” Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark, Vol. 16, 1–10.
   Google Scholar