Early and late responders to questionnaires: clues from psychological type

References

• Aday, L. A. (1996). Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baab, L. M. (1998). Personality type in congregations: How to work with others more effectively. Washington, DC: Alban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Backstrom, C. H., & Hirsh, G. D. (1963). Survey research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbuto, J. E., Fritz, S. M., Lim, J. C. S., & Xu, Y. (2008). Using the MBTI instrument and the Motivation Sources Inventory to test the relationship between Jung's psychological types and sources of work motivation. Journal of Psychological Type, 68, 139–147.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Wei, L., & Syme, P. D. (2003). Comparison of early and delayed respondents to a postal health survey: A questionnaire study of personality traits and neuropsychological symptoms. European Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 195–202. doi: 10.1023/A:1023393231234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L., Duncan, B., & Francis, L. J. (2006). Psychological type preferences of Roman Catholic priests in the United Kingdom. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 27, 157–164. doi:10.1080/13617670600849812
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L. Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2004). Psychological type and sex differences among church leaders in the United Kingdom. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 25, 3–13. doi:10.1080/13617670420000199004
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L. Horsfall, T., & Francis, L. J. (2005). Psychological types of male missionary personnel training in England: A role for thinking type men? Pastoral Psychology, 53, 475–482. doi: 10.1007/s11089-005-2588-8
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413–428. doi: 10.1086/318638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiRienzo, C., Kitts, J., Das, J., McGrath, K., & Synn, W. (2010). The relationship between MBTI and academic performance: A study across academic disciplines. Journal of Psychological Type, 70, 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. (1993). Pray your way: Your personality and God. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R., & Kwan, I. (2002). Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 324, 1183–1185. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowke, R. (1997). Personality and prayer: Finding and extending the prayer style that suits your personality. Guildford: Eagle.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Butler, A. (2007). Psychological types of male evangelical Anglican seminarians in England. Journal of Psychological Type, 67, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Whinney, M., Tilley, D., & Slater, P. (2007). Psychological profiling of Anglican clergy in England: Employing Jungian typology to interpret diversity, strengths, and potential weaknesses in ministry. International Journal of Practical Theology, 11, 266–284. doi: 10.1515/IJPT.2007.17
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Gubb, S., & Robbins, M. (2012). Work-related psychological health and psychological type among lead elders within the Newfrontiers network of churches in the United Kingdom. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 40, 233–245. doi:10.1080/10852352.2012.680422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Nash, P., Nash, S., & Craig, C. L. (2007). Psychology and youth ministry: Psychological type preferences of Christian youth workers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Youth Ministry, 5, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., & Jones, S. H. (2001). Psychological types of male Anglican clergy in Wales. Journal of Psychological Type, 56, 19–23. doi:10.1080/13674670123953
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Penson, A. W., & Jones, S. H. (2001). Psychological types of male and female Bible College students in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 4, 23–32. doi: 10.1080/13674670123953
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2002). Psychological types of male evangelical church leaders. Journal of Belief and Values, 23, 217–220. doi:10.1080/1361767022000010860
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2008). Psychological type and prayer preferences: A study among Anglican clergy in the United Kingdom. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11, 67–84. doi:10.1080/13674670701619445
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Whinney, M. (2011). Women priests in the Church of England: Psychological type profile. Religions, 2, 389–397. doi: 10.3390/rel2030389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2012). The psychological temperament of Anglican clergy in Ordained Local Ministry (OLM): The conserving, serving pastor? Journal of Empirical Theology, 25, 57–76. doi:10.1163/157092512X635743
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., Whinney, M., Burton, L., & Robbins, M. (2011). Psychological type preferences of male and female Free Church ministers in England. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., Krosnick, J., & Pfent, A. (2007). The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, N. C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, M. W. Link, R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 499–678). New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470173404.ch23
   Google Scholar
• Jarlstrom, M., & Valkealahti, K. (2010). Person-job fit related to psychological type of Finnish business students and managers: Implications for change in the management environment. Journal of Psychological Type, 70, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 440–453. doi: 10.2307/3151093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, W. K., Francis, L. J., & Craig, C. L. (2008). Psychological type preferences of male British Assemblies of God Bible College students: Tough minded or tender hearted? Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association, 28, 6–20. doi: 10.1179/jep.2008.28.1.002
   Google Scholar
• Keating, C. J. (1987). Who we are is how we pray: Matching personality and spirituality. Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third.
   Google Scholar
• Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a National RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 759–779. doi:10.1093/poq/nf1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
   Google Scholar
• Macdaid, G. P., McCaulley, M. H., & Kainz, R. I. (1986). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Atlas of type tables. Gainesville, FL: Centre for Application of Psychological Type.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, P. (2001). Prayer life: How your personality affects the way you pray. Carlisle: Paternoster.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, C. P., & Norrisey, M. C. (1984). Prayer and temperament: Different prayer forms for different personality types. Charlottesville, VA: The Open Door.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B. (2000). Introduction to type: A guide to understanding your results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Oxford: OPP.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, L., & Osborn, D. (1991). God’s diverse people. London: Daybreak.
   Google Scholar
• Paganini-Hill, A., Hsu, G., Chao, A., & Ross, R. K. (1993). Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire. Epidemiology, 4, 375–379. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199307000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1997). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, J. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). A comparison of early and late respondents in a twin-family survey study. Twin Research and Human Genetics: The Official Journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 11, 165–173. doi:10.1375/twin.11.2.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., Marquette, J., & Curtin, M. (1996). Mail surveys for election forecasting? An evaluation of the Colombia Dispatch Poll. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 181–227. doi:10.1086/297748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, G. J. S. (1970). Neurotische labiliteit gemeten volgens de vragenlijst methode [The questionnaire method as a means of measuring neurotic instability]. Amsterdam: van Rossen.
   Google Scholar