1,541
Views
87
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Who is Mturk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 934-944 | Received 31 May 2018, Accepted 05 Jun 2018, Published online: 19 Jul 2018

References

  • Berinsky, A., Huber, G., Lenz, G., & Alvarez, R. M. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
  • Bohannon, J. (2016). Mechanical Turk upends social science. Science, 352, 1263–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263
  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
  • Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112–130. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
  • Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2014). Is there a cost to convenience? An experimental comparison of data quality in laboratory and online studies. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1, 120–131. doi: 10.1017/xps.2014.5
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Crumbaugh, J. (1968). Purpose-in-Life Test. Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, 74–81. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263
  • Feitosa, J., Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2015). Crowdsourcing and personality measurement equivalence: A warning about countries whose primary language is not English. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.017
  • Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
  • Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2012). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1753
  • Guttmann, D. (1996). Logotherapy for the helping professional. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Horton, J., & Chilton, L. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0627.pdf
  • Ipeirotis, P. (2012). Demographics of Mechanical Turk. Retrieved from http://www.ipeirotis.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CeDER-10-01.pdf
  • Kam, C. D., Wilking, J. R., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2007). Beyond the ‘narrow data base’: Another convenience sample for experimental research. Political Behavior, 29, 415–440. doi: 10.1007/s11109-007-9037-6
  • Lewis, A. R., Djupe, P. A., Mockabee, S. T., & Su-Ya Wu, J. (2015). The (non) religion of Mechanical Turk workers. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54, 419–428. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12184
  • Lowenthal, M. F., Thurner, M., & Chiriboga, D. (1975). Four stages of life: A psychological study of men and women facing transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lugo, L., Stencel, S., Green, J., Smith, G., Cox, D., Pond, A., & Taylor, P. (2008). US religious landscape survey: Religious affiliation-diverse and dynamic. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/05/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf
  • Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2011). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
  • Michel, J. S., O’Neill, S. K., Hartman, P., & Lorys, A. (2017). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a viable source for organizational and occupational health research. Occupational Health Science, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s41542-017-0009-x
  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419. Retrieved from http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10630a/jdm10630a.pdf
  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Religious landscape study. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Piedmont, R. L. (2010). Assessment of spirituality and religious sentiments, technical manual (2nd ed.). Timonium, MD: Author.
  • Roberts, T. M., Jangha, A., Piedmont, R. L., Sherman, M. F., & Williams, J. E. G. (2015). Factor structure and personality disorder correlates of responses to the 50-item IPIP Big Five Marker Scale. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.