Disclosure as a tool in stakeholder relations management: a longitudinal study on the Port of Rotterdam

References

• AICPA. 1994. Improving Business Reporting (The Jenkins Report). New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., B. McInnes, and S. Fearnley. 2004. “A Methodology for Analyzing and Evaluating Narratives in Annual Reports: A Comprehensive Descriptive Profile and Metrics for Disclosure Quality Attributes.” Accounting Forum 28 (3): 205–236. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. 2009. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boesso, G., and K. Kumar. 2007. “Drivers of Corporate Voluntary Disclosure. A Framework and Empirical Evidence from Italy and the United States.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20: 269–296. doi: 10.1108/09513570710741028
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 1988. “Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sectors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line.” Public Administration Review 48: 672–674. doi: 10.2307/975772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R. 2007. “Port Devolution and Governance in Canada.” Research in Transportation Economics 17: 237–257. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17011-0
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., and A. A. Pallis. 2008. “Assessing Port Governance Models: Process and Performance Components.” Maritime Policy & Management 35: 411–432. doi: 10.1080/03088830802215060
   Google Scholar
• Caballini, C., L. Carpaneto, and F. Parola. 2009. “Italian Port Authorities Approaching the Post-reform: The Ligurian Case.” In Ports in Proximity: Competition and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports, edited by T. Notteboom, P. de Langen, and C. Ducruet, 191–208. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cahoon, S. 2007. “Marketing Communications for Seaports: A Matter of Survival and Growth.” Maritime Policy & Management 34: 151–168. doi: 10.1080/03088830701240342
   Google Scholar
• Chlomoudis, C. I., and A. A. Pallis. 2004. “Port Governance and the Smart Port Authority: Key Issues for the Reinforcement of Quality Services in European Ports.” Paper presented at the 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, July 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., and D.-W. Song. 2002. “Port Privatization Policy and Practice.” Transport Reviews 22: 55–75. doi: 10.1080/01441640110042138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrie, J., V. Lavaud-Letilleul, and F. Parola. 2013. “Shaping Port Governance: The Territorial Trajectories of Reform.” Journal of Transport Geography 27: 56–65 doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2007. “Stakeholders, Conflicting Interests and Governance in Port Clusters.” Research in Transportation Economics 17: 457–477. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17020-1
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P., M. Nijdam, and M. van der Horst. 2007. “New Indicators to Measure Port Performance.” Journal of Maritime Research 4: 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Denktas-Sakar, G., and C. Karatas-Cetin. 2012. “Port Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Supply Chains: A Framework on Resource Dependence Theory.” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 28: 301–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., L. van der Lugt, and P. W. de Langen. 2013. “International Strategies of Port Authorities: The Case of the Port of Rotterdam Authority.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., and A. Verbeke. 2007. “Stakeholder Management in Ports: A Conceptual Framework Integrating Insights from Research in Strategy, Corporate Social Responsibility and Port Management.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Society of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Athens, July 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., A. Verbeke, and E. Haezendonck. 2013. “Stakeholder Management and Path Dependence in Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Development: The Port of Antwerp Case (1960–2010).” Journal of Transport Geography 27: 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. R. 2004. A Stakeholder Theory of Modern Corporations. Ethical Theory and Business. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guasch, J. L. 2004. Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions: Doing it Right. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Haugstetter, H., and S. Cahoon. 2010. “Strategic Intent: Guiding Port Authorities to Their New World?” Research in Transportation Economics 27 (1): 30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Henesey, L., T. Notteboom, and P. Davidsson. 2004. “Agent-based Simulation of Stakeholders Relations: An Approach to Sustainable Port and Terminal Management.” In Enhancing Container Terminal Performance: A Multi-agent Systems Approach, edited by L. Henesey, 73–100. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, J., D. Coy, and H. Davis. 2002. “The Information Gap in Annual Reports.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 4: 501–522. doi: 10.1108/09513570210440577
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, W. 2007. Political Economy of Port Competition: Institutional Analysis of Rotterdam, Dubai and Southern California. Nijmegen: Academic Press Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. S. 2001. “Hybrid Organizations and the Alignment of Interests: The Case of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” Public Administration Review 61: 468–482. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. S. 2006. The politics of Quasi-Government. Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. 1997. “The Netherlands: A Net Exporter of Environmental Policy Concepts.” In European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers, edited by M. S. Andersen and D. Liefferink, 210–250. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. Campanella Bracken. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.” Human Communication Research 28: 587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, O., and T. Notteboom. 2013. “The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: the Case of Rotterdam, Amsterdam – the Netherlands.” OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013/02, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Angle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Towards a Theory of Stakeholders Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22: 853–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moglia, F., and M. Sanguineri. 2003. “Port Planning: The Need for a New Approach.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 5: 413–425. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100089
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. Content Analysis. Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2002. “Port Rivalry and the Distribution of Economic Rent in a Logistic-Restructured Environment.” In Current Issues in Port Logistics and Intermodality, edited by T. Notteboom, 7–22. Leuven: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., P. De Langen, and W. Jacobs. 2013. “Institutional Plasticity and Path Dependence in Seaports: Interactions between Institutions, Port Governance Reforms and Port Authority Routines.” Journal of Transport Geography 27: 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and W. Winkelmans. 2001. “Structural Changes in Logistics: How Will Port Authorities Face the Challenge.” Maritime Policy & Management 28: 71–89. doi: 10.1080/03088830119197
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and W. Winkelmans. 2002. “Stakeholder Relations Management in Ports: Dealing with the Interplay of Forces among Stakeholders in a Changing Competitive Environment.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Society of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Panama City, November 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and W. Winkelmans. 2003. “Dealing with Stakeholders in the Port Planning Process.” In Across the Border: Building Upon a Quarter of Century of Transport Research in the Benelux, edited by D. Wout, B. Jourquin, and J. Polak, 249–265. Antwerp: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. “ Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: A Case Study of the Port of Rotterdam.” ENV/EPOC/WPNEP/T(2009)6/FINAL. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Paixão Casaca, A. C. 2008. “Motorway of the Sea Port Requirements: The Viewpoint of Port Authorities.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 11 (4): 279–294. doi: 10.1080/13675560801912254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A. 2007. “Whither Port Strategy? Theory and Practice in Conflict.” Research in Transportation Economics 21: 343–382. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(07)21011-X
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., T. K. Vitsounis, P. W. De Langen, and T. E. Notteboom. 2011. “Port Economics, Policy and Management: Content Classification and Survey.” Transport Reviews 31: 445–471. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.530699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pando, J., A. Araujo, and F. J. Maqueda. 2005. “Marketing Management at the World's Major Ports.” Maritime Policy & Management 32: 67–87. doi: 10.1080/03088830500097414
   Google Scholar
• Parola, F., and S. Maugeri. 2013. “Origin and Taxonomy of Conflicts in Seaports: Towards a Research Agenda.” Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8: 114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Parola, F., G. Satta, L. Penco, and G. Profumo. 2013. “Emerging Port Authority Communication Strategies: Assessing the Determinants of Disclosure in the Annual Report.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 134–147. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Siemonsma, H., W. Van Nus, and P. Uyttendaele. 2012. “Awarding of Port PPP Contracts: The Added Value of a Competitive Dialogue Procedure.” Maritime Policy & Management 39: 63–78. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.642314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y., G.-S. Liang, C.-F. Liu, and T.-Y. Chou. 2003. “A Study of Integrated Port Performance Comparison Based on the Concept of Balanced Scorecard.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5: 609–624.
   Google Scholar
• Tilt, C. A. 1994. “The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure: Some Empirical Evidence.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7: 47–72. doi: 10.1108/09513579410069849
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., R. Hollen, H. W. Volberda, and M. G. Baaij. 2011. The Strategic Value of the Port of Rotterdam for the International Competitiveness of the Netherlands: A First Exploration. Rotterdam: INSCOPE/RSM Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, L., M. Dooms, and F. Parola. 2013. “Strategy Making by Hybrid Organizations: The Case of the Port Authority.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. 2010. “A Review of Port Authority Functions: Towards a Renaissance?” Maritime Policy & Management 37: 247–270. doi: 10.1080/03088831003700645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., A. K.-Y. Ng, and D. Olivier. 2004. “Port Governance in China: A Review of Policies in an Era of Internationalizing Port Management Practices.” Transport Policy 11: 237–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., and B. Slack. 2004. “Regional Governance of Port Development in China: A Case Study of Shanghai International Shipping Center.” Maritime Policy & Management 31 (4): 357–373. doi: 10.1080/0308883042000304467
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. 1985. Basic Content Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yarnell, P. 1999. “Port Administration and Integrated Coastal Management under the Canada Marine Act in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.” Coastal Management 27: 343–354. doi: 10.1080/089207599263758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar