Transferia: solving local pain or bringing global gain?

References

• Acciaro, Michele, and Alan McKinnon. 2013. “Efficient Hinterland Transport Infrastructure and Services for Large Container Ports.” 2013–2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosino, Daniela, Claudio Ferrari, Anna Sciomachen, and Alessio Tei. 2016. “Intermodal Nodes and External Costs: Re-thinking the Current Network Organization.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 19: 106–117. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCTN. 2015. “Transferium Rotterdam Oost.” http://rotterdam-oost.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchery, Y., and J. Fransoo. 2014. “Cost, Carbon Emissions and Modal Shift in Intermodal Network Design Decisions.” International Journal of Production Economics 164: 388–399. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, Martijn, and Panayotis Christidis. 2013. “External Cost Calculator for Marco Polo Freight Transport Project Proposals.” doi:10.2788/23790.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, Kevin, Rickard Bergqvist, and Gordon Wilmsmeier. 2012. “The Dry Port Concept – Theory and Practice.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 14 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1057/mel.2011.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Langen, Peter W. 2012. “Towards Efficient and Sustainable Transport Chains: The Case of the Port of Rotterdam.” In Les Corridors de Transport, edited by Yann Alix, 253–262. Cormelles-le-Royal, Les collec.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, Peter W., Roy Van den Berg, and Aernoud Willeumier. 2012. “A New Approach to Granting Terminal Concessions: The Case of the Rotterdam World Gateway Terminal.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (1): 79–90. doi:10.1080/03088839.2011.642311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vlieger, I., E. Cornelis, H. Joul, and L. Int Panis. 2004. “Milieuprestaties van de Binnenvaart in Vlaanderen.”
   Google Scholar
• Defares, Danitza. 2011. “Exploration of Future Container Transport to and from the Dutch Hinterland – Assessing the Need for Future Policies. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• den Boer, Eelco, Matthijs Otten, and Huib van Essen. 2011. “Comparison of Various Transport Modes on a EU Scale with the STREAM Database.” Delft.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “C(2011) 7286 Final Containertransferium Beverdonk.” Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, Stephanie, and Herbert Kotzab. 2017. “An Inland-Depots-for-Empty-Containers-Model for the Hinterland.” Maritime Business Review 2 (2): 126–141. doi:10.1108/MABR-10-2016-0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froeling, D. W. 2008. “Container Transferium Rotterdam - Onderzoek Naar de Logistieke Prestatie van Container Transport Tussen Zeeterminals En Een Transferium, Gelegen in Het Directe Achterland van de Rotterdamse Haven - Eindrapport.” Technische Universiteit Delft. doi:10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439632.
   Google Scholar
• Froeling, D. W., M. van Schuylenburg, R. Groenveld, and P. Taneja. 2008. “Container Transferium Rotterdam.” In International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future, INFRA 2008. doi:10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439632.
   Google Scholar
• Geerlings, Harry, and Ron van Duin. 2011. “A New Method for Assessing CO2-Emissions from Container Terminals: A Promising Approach Applied in Rotterdam.” Journal of Cleaner Production 19 (6–7): 657–666. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, G., A. Varma, A. Cox, V. (Ricardo-AEA) Korzhenevych, J. Dehnen, N. (DIW econ) Bröcker, M. Holtkamp, and H. (CAU) Meier. 2014. “Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport – Final Report.” London.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D. 2016. “Containertransferia: De Oplossing Voor Havencongestie?” Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Henttu, Ville, and Olli-Pekka Hilmola. 2011. “Financial and Environmental Impacts of Hypothetical Finnish Dry Port Structure.” Research in Transportation Economics 33 (1): 35–41. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, C., M. Ferguson, and P. Kanaroglou. 2012. “Varieties of Logistics Centers: Developing Standardized Typology and Hierarchy.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2288. doi:10.3141/2288-02.
   Google Scholar
• Janic, Milan. 2007. “Modelling the Full Costs of an Intermodal and Road Freight Transport Network.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzberger, Ekki, Cathy Macharis, L. Vereecken, and Johan Woxenius. 2003. “Is Intermodal Freight Transport More Environmentally Friendly Than All-Road Freight Transport? A Review.” In Presented at Nectar Conference No. 7, June 13–15. Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzberger, Ekki, and Rob Konings. 2013. “The Role of Inland Terminals in Intermodal Transport Development.” In The SAGE Handbook of Transport Studies, edited by Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Theo Notteboom, and Jon Shaw, 179–207. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leveque, P., and Violeta Roso. 2002. “Dry Port Concept for Seaport Inland Access with Intermodal Solutions. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, Cathy. 2000. Strategische Modellering Voor Intermodale Terminals, Socio-Economische Evaluatie van de Locatie van Binnenvaart/weg Terminals in Vlaanderen. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, Cathy, Dries Meers, and Tom van Lier. 2014. “Grensoverschrijdende Bundeling van Goederenstromen in de Extended Gateway Antwerpen/Rotterdam-Limburg (BE+NL), Met Een Focus Op Binnenvaart – Interreg IV-A Grensregio Vlaanderen–Nederland Grenzeloze – Rapport Desk Research.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, M., C. Schreyer, D. Sutter, H. P. van Essen, B. H. Boon, R. Smokers, A. Schroten, C. Doll, B. Pawlowska, and M. Bak. 2008. “Handbook on Estimation of External Costs in the Transport Sector Internalisation Measures and Policies for All External Cost of Transport (IMPACT) Version 1.1.” Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Market-up consortium. 2012a. “Maritime and Inland Waterway Transport Container Transferium Show Case.”
   Google Scholar
• Market-up consortium. 2012b. “Market-Up, Selected Case Studies on Transport Innovation: R&D Initiatives and Market Uptake of Results - Deliverable 3.1.”
   Google Scholar
• Meers, Dries, Cathy Macharis, and Tom van Lier. 2016a. “Leviers and Threats for Intermodal Transport - Evaluating Transferia, Longer and Heavier Trucks and User Preferences.” Antwerp, Belgium. https://www.uantwerpen.be/nl/steunpunten/mobilo/onderzoeksresultaten/beleidspapers/.
   Google Scholar
• Meers, Dries, Cathy Macharis, and Tom van Lier. 2016b. “Longer and Heavier Vehicles in Belgium: A Threat for the Intermodal Sector?” Transportation Research Part D. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Monios, Jason, and Bruce Lambert. 2013. “Intermodal Freight Corridor Development.” In Dry Ports – A Global Perspective – Challenges and Developments in Serving Hinterlands, edited by Rickard Bergqvist, Gordon Wilmsmeier, and Kevin Cullinane, 197–218. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, Theo. 2013. “Maritime Transportation and Seaports.” In The SAGE Handbook of Transport Studies, edited by Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Theo Notteboom, and Jon Shaw, 83–101. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, Theo, Francesco Parola, Giovanni Satta, and Marcello Risitano. 2017. “A Taxonomy of Logistics Centres: Overcoming Conceptual Ambiguity.” Transport Reviews 37 (3): 276–299. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1231234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, Theo, and Jean-Paul Rodrigue. 2005. “Port Regionalization: Towards a new Phase in Port Development.” Maritime Policy & Management: The Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 32 (3): 297–313. doi:10.1080/03088830500139885.
   Google Scholar
• Pekin, Ethem, Cathy Macharis, Dries Meers, and Piet Rietveld. 2013. “Location Analysis Model for Belgian Intermodal Terminals: Importance of the Value of Time in the Intermodal Transport Chain.” Computers in Industry 64: 113–120. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. 2017. “The Geography of Transport Systems – The Alameda Rail Corridor.” New York: Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Hofstra University. https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch3en/conc3en/alamedacorridor.html
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, Jean-Paul, and Theo Notteboom. 2010. “Comparative North American and European Gateway Logistics: The Regionalism of Freight Distribution.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (4): 497–507. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, Violeta. 2009. “The Emergence and Significance of Dry Ports: The Case of the Port of Gothenburg.” World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2 (4): 296–310. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2009.026209.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, Violeta. 2013. “Sustainable Intermodal Transport via Dry Ports – Importance of Directional Development.” World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 4 (2–3): 140–156. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2013.058976.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, Violeta, Johan Woxenius, and Kenth Lumsden. 2009. “The Dry Port Concept: Connecting Container Seaports with the Hinterland.” Journal of Transport Geography 17 (5): 338–345. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, Brian. 1999. “Satellite Terminals: A Local Solution to Hub Congestion?” Journal of Transport Geography 7 (4): 241–246. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00016-2.
   Google Scholar
• Theofanis, Sotirios, and Mario Boile. 2009. “Empty Marine Container Logistics: Facts, Issues and Management Strategies.” GeoJournal 74: 51. doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9214-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, L. Lei, and Richard L. Church. 2011. “Locating Short-Term Empty-Container Storage Facilities to Support Port Operations: A User Optimal Approach.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 47 (5): 738–754. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Steen, Biek. 2010. “Inlandstromen Gericht Op Limburg”, Innovatie Value Added Logistics Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• van Klink, H Arjen, and Geerke C van den Berg. 1998. “Gateways and Intermodalism.” Journal of Transport Geography 6 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00035-5.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, Tom, and Cathy Macharis. 2014. “Assessing the Environmental Impact of Inland Waterway Transport Using a Life-Cycle Assessment Approach: The Case of Flanders.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 12: 29–40. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, Tom, Cathy Macharis, and Dries Meers. 2015. “Applying Longer and Heavier Vehicles in a Congestion Avoiding Shuttle Concept.” In 94th annual meeting TRB, January 11–15. Washington.
   Google Scholar
• van Schuylenburg, Maurits, and Linda Borsodi. 2010. “Container Transferium Rotterdam : An Innovative Logistic Concept.” In Port Infrastructure Seminar 2010, June 22–23. Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, Albert, Rob Zuidwijk, and Eelco van Asperen. 2012. “The Extended Gate Concept for Container Terminals: Expanding the Notion of Dry Ports.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 14: 14–32. doi:10.1057/mel.2011.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warffemius, Pim, and Jan Francke. 2010. “Achterlandcongestie En de Rol van Vervoer over Water Voor Mainport Rotterdam.”, Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Den Haag, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar