The effect of Phase One training on young recruits' personal and professional development in the British army

References

• Barrett, F. J. 1996. “The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy.” Gender, Work and Organization 3 (3): 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.1996.tb00054.x.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V. 2009. “Effecting Discrimination: Operational Effectiveness and Harassment in the British Armed Forces.” Armed Forces & Society 35 (4): 728–744. doi:10.1177/0095327X08324762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. 1977. Sociological Work – Method and Substance. New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckman. 1976. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, G., and T. Rutherford. 2012. Defence Personnel Statistics. Commons Library Standard Note: SN/SG/02183. Accessed November 30, 2012. http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN02183.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1989. “Masculinity, Violence and War.” In Men’s Lives, edited by M. Kimmel and M. Messner, 194–200. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eighmey, J. 2006. “Why Do Youth Enlist? Identification of Underlying Themes.” Armed Forces & Society 32 (2): 307–328. doi:10.1177/0095327X05281017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, G. H. 1986. “Military Times and Turning Points in Men's Lives.” Developmental Psychology 22 (2): 233–245. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, G. H., and M. K. Johnson. 2002. “The Life Course and Aging: Challenges, Lessons, and New Directions.” In Invitation to the Life Course: Towards New Understandings of Later Life, edited by R. A. Settersten, 49–81. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. 1962. “Notes in Reply To the Staff Notes from 16 October 1962.” With a Few Additional Remarks on RB's Memorandum to the Problem of Sampling, University of Ghana, October 22, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Giele, J. Z., and G. H. Elder. 1998. “Life Course Research: Development of a Field.” In Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, edited by J. Z. Giele and G. H. Elder, 5–27. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, R. 2012. “Military, Masculinity and Mediated Representations: (Con)/fusing the Real and the Reel.” In. Organizations and Popular Culture: Information, Representation and Transformation, edited by C. Rhodes and S. Lilley, 50–67. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. 2007. “The Transition to Work and Adulthood: Becoming Adults via Communities of Practice.” In Communities of Practice, edited by J. Hughes, N. Jewson, and L. Unwin, 96–108. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., and O’Connor, H. 2007. “Researching 40 Years of Learning for Work: The Experiences of One Cohort of Workers.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 59 (3): 349–367. doi:10.1080/13636820701520393.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. 2008. “Institutional Motives for Serving in the U.S. Army National Guard: Implications for Recruitment, Retention, and Readiness.” Armed Forces & Society 34 (2): 230–258. doi:10.1177/0095327X06293864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. C. 2008. “The Development of British Military Masculinities through Symbolic Resources.” Culture & Psychology 14 (3): 305–332. doi:10.1177/1354067X08092636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. C. 2012. “The Role of Practice in the Development of Military Masculinities.” Gender, Work and Organization 19 (6): 699–722. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00542.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. 2012. “A Multi-faceted Power Analysis of Men's Violence to Known Women: From Hegemonic Masculinity to the Hegemony of Men.” The Sociological Review 60 (4): 589–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, C. 2002. War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. Oxford: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, W. R. 2009. “Structure and Agency in Transition Research. Journal of Education and Work. Special issue: Continuity and change in 40 years of school to work transitions 22: 391–404.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P., and J. Hopton. 2005. “War, Militarism and Masculinities.” In Handbook of Studies of Men & Masculinities, edited by M. Kimmel, J. Hearn, and R. W. Connell, 432–447. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P. R. 2003. “‘Soft Clerks’ and ‘Hard Civvies’: Pluralizing Military Masculinities.” In Military Masculinities: Identity and the State, edited by P. Higate, 27–41. Westport, CT: Praege.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1986. Squaddies: Portrait of a Subculture. Exeter: Exeter University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 2003. “No More Heroes: Masculinity and the Infantry.” In Military Masculinities: Identity and the State, edited by P. Higate, 15–25. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G., and K. Ballet. 2002. “The Micropolitics of Teacher Induction. A Narrative-biographical Study on Teacher Socialisation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (1): 105–120. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. 1996. Changing Men: New Directions in the Study of Men and Masculinity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 2007. “The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed Forces.” Armed Forces & Society 33 (4): 638–645. doi:10.1177/0095327X07301445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirke, C. 2009. “Group Cohesion, Culture, and Practice.” Armed Forces & Society 35 (4): 745–753. doi:10.1177/0095327X09332144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovitz, M. 2003. “The Roots of Military Masculinity.” In Military Masculinities: Identity and the State, edited by P. Higate, 1–13. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lahelma, E. 2005. “Finding Communalities, Making Differences, Performing Masculinities: Reflections of Young Men on Military Service.” Gender and Education 17 (3): 305–317. doi:10.1080/09540250500145080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande, B. 2007. “Breathing Like a Soldier: Culture Incarnate.” The Sociological Review 55 (1): 95–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00695.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, A., and G. H. Elder. 2007. “Military Service in the Life Course.” Annual Review of Sociology 33 (1): 175–196. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1992. Discovering Men. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1994. “Theater of War.” In Theorizing Masculinities, edited by H. Brod and M. Kaufman, 165–182. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. 1977. “From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization.” Armed Forces & Society 4 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1177/0095327X7700400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, C., and F. Wood, eds. 1988. (Introduction) The Military: More than Just a Job. New York: Pergamon-Brassey International Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. 2011. Census. Accessed April 7, 2014. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census/key-statistics-for-local-authorities-in-england-and-wales/stb-2011-census-key-statistics-for-england-and-wales.html#tab---Ethnic-group.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., L. Schatzman, D. Erlich, R. Bucher, and M. Sabshin 1963. “The Hospital and Its Negotiated Order.” In The Hospital in Modern Society, edited by E. Friedson, 147–169. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Translated by M. B. Visedom and G. L. Caffe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vorhaus, J., B. Creese, J. Swain, O. Cara, and J. Litster. 2012. Armed Forces Longitudinal Study: Basic Skills and Operational Effectiveness in the British Armed Forces [IOE Research Briefing N°61]. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1977. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, T., R. Kelly, and D. Segal. 2006. “Propensity to Serve and Motivation to Enlist among American Combat Soldiers.” Armed Forces & Society 32 (3): 353–366. doi:10.1177/0095327X05283040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. 1998. “‘It's a Man's Life: Soldiers, Masculinity and the Countryside.” Gender, Place & Culture 5 (3): 277–300. doi:10.1080/09663699825214.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. 2003. “Locating Military Masculinities: Space, Place, and the Formulation of Gender, Identity in the British Army.” In Military Masculinities: Identity and the State, edited by P. Higate, 43–55. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and K. N. Jenkings. 2011. “Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Military Personnel.” Sociology 45 (2): 252–268.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and N. K. Jenkings. 2012a. “Military Memoirs, Their Covers and the Reproduction of Public Narratives of War.” Journal of War and Culture Studies 5 (3): 349–369. Special issue, ‘Men at War’. doi:10.1386/jwcs.5.3.349_1.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and K. N. Jenkings. 2012b. “Soldiers’ Bodies and the Contemporary British Military Memoir.” In War and the Body: Militarisation, Practice and Experience, edited by K. McSorley, S. Maltby, and G. Schaffer, 152–164. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and P. Winter. 2004. “Discourses of Gender in the Contemporary British Army.” Armed Forces & Society 30 (2): 279–301. doi:10.1177/0095327X0403000207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., and J. Gore. 1990. “Teacher Socialisation.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by R. Houston, 329–348. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, T. 2006. Transitions. Development through Symbolic Resources. Al. Advances in Cultural Psychology: Constructing Development. Greenwich, CT. InfoAge.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, T. 2009. “Dynamics of Life-course Transitions – A Methodological Reflection.” In Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences, edited by J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, and N. Chaudhary, 405–430. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar