Gender differences in STEM expectations across countries: how perceived labor market structures shape adolescents’ preferences

References

• Alm, S. 2015. “Dreams Meeting Reality? A Gendered Perspective on the Relationship Between Occupational Preferences in Early Adolescence and Actual Occupation in Adulthood.” Journal of Youth Studies 18: 1077–1095. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1020928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2013. “‘Not Girly, Not Sexy, Not Glamorous’: Primary School Girls’ and Parents’ Constructions of Science Aspirations.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 21: 171–194. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
   Google Scholar
• Barone, C. 2011. “Some Things Never Change: Gender Segregation in Higher Education Across Eight Nations and Three Decades.” Sociology of Education 84: 157–176. doi: 10.1177/0038040711402099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, Z., A. Pokropek, and J. Sikora. 2018. “Science Career Plans of Adolescents: Patterns Trends and Gender Divide.” Science for Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Borgna, C., and D. Contini. 2014. “Migrant Achievement Penalties in Western Europe: Do Educational Systems Matter?” European Sociological Review 30: 670–683. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, M. L., and S. P. Jenkins. 2016. “Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale.” European Sociological Review 32: 3–22. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcv059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch-Heizmann, A. 2015. “Supply-Side Explanations for Occupational Gender Segregation: Adolescents’ Work Values and Gender-(A)Typical Occupational Aspirations.” European Sociological Review 31: 48–64. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. 2015. “Engineers and Engineeresses? Self-Conceptions and the Development of Gendered Professional Identities.” Sociological Perspectives 58: 56–77. doi: 10.1177/0731121414556543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E., B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C. Seron. 2011. “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering.” American Sociological Review 76: 641–666. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M. 2005. “National Skill Regimes, Postindustrialism, and Sex Segregation.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12: 289–316. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxi015
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M. 2017. “Venus, Mars, and Math: Gender, Societal Affluence, and Eighth Graders’ Aspirations for STEM.” Socius 3: 1–16. doi: 10.1177/2378023117697179
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M., and K. Bradley. 2009. “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114: 924–976. doi: 10.1086/595942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M., and D. B. Grusky. 2004. Occupational Ghettos. The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M., B. Harr, E. Cech, and A. Hendley. 2014. “Who Likes Math Where? Gender Differences in Eighth-Graders’ Attitudes Around the World.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 24: 85–112. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2014.895140
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. A. 2018. “Gendered Expectations of the Biographical and Social Future: Young Adults’ Approaches to Short and Long-Term Thinking.” Journal of Youth Studies 21: 1376–1391. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1468875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. 1994. “Understanding Women’s Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18: 585–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society 24: 149–166. doi: 10.1177/0891243210361475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., L. Archer, J. Moote, J. de Witt, and L. Yeomans. 2017. “Femininity, Science, and the Denigration of the Girly Girl.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38: 1097–1110. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1253455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay-Egozi, L., Y. Shavit, and M. Yaish. 2015. “Gender Differences in Fields of Study: The Role of Significant Others and Rational Choice Motivations.” European Sociological Review 31: 284–297. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J. L., S. Sassler, Y. Levitte, and K. M. Michelmore. 2013. “What’s So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women’s Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations.” Social Forces 92: 723–756. doi: 10.1093/sf/sot092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S., and R. T. Lapan. 1997. “Assessing Gender-Based Circumscription of Occupational Aspirations.” Journal of Career Assessment 5: 419–441. doi: 10.1177/106907279700500404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., H. W. Marsh, A. J. S. Morin, P. D. Parker, and G. Kaur. 2015. “Directionality of the Associations of High School Expectancy-Value, Aspirations, and Attainment: A Longitudinal Study.” American Educational Research Journal 52: 371–402. doi: 10.3102/0002831214565786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. W. 2015. “Curriculum Standardization, Stratification, and Students’ STEM-Related Occupational Expectations: Evidence from PISA 2006.” International Journal of Educational Research 72: 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., and M. Schaeffer. 2019. “Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction.” European Sociological Review 35: 258–279. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcy053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., M. Schaeffer, and J. Giesecke. 2017. “The Costs of Simplicity: Why Multilevel Models May Benefit from Accounting for Cross-Cluster Differences in the Effects of Controls.” American Sociological Review 82: 796–827. doi: 10.1177/0003122417717901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillmert, S. 2015. “Gender Segregation in Occupational Expectations and in the Labour Market: International Variation and the Role of Education and Training Systems.” In Gender Segregation in Vocational Education (Comparative Social Research), edited by C. Imdorf, K. Hegna, and L. Reisel, 123–148. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, J. O. 1999. “Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice an Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model.” European Sociological Review 15: 391–404. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., C. R. Tamborini, and A. Sakamoto. 2015. “Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States.” Sociology of Education 88: 320–339. doi: 10.1177/0038040715602132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuha, J., and C. Mills. 2020. “On Group Comparisons with Logistic Regression Models.” Sociological Methods & Research 49: 498–525. 0049124117747306. doi: 10.1177/0049124117747306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauermann, F., Y.-M. Tsai, and J. S. Eccles. 2017. “Math-Related Career Aspirations and Choices Within Eccles et al.’s Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement-Related Behaviors.” Developmental Psychology 53: 1540–1559. doi: 10.1037/dev0000367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., and T. A. DiPrete. 2014a. “The High School Environment and the Gender Gap in Science and Engineering.” Sociology of Education 87: 259–280. doi: 10.1177/0038040714547770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., and T. A. DiPrete. 2014b. “Pathways to Science and Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees for Men and Women.” Sociological Science 1: 41–48. doi: 10.15195/v1.a4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, JB, and DA Linzer. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13: 345–364. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lörz, M., S. Schindler, and J. G. Walter. 2011. “Gender Inequalities in Higher Education: Extent, Development and Mechanisms of Gender Differences in Enrolment and Field of Study Choice.” Irish Educational Studies 30: 179–198. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2011.569139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C. 2013. “More Women, Lower Pay? Occupational Sex Composition, Wages and Wage Growth.” Acta Sociologica 56: 227–245. doi: 10.1177/0001699313484480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C., and M. Nermo. 2018. “From Childhood to Young Adulthood: The Importance of Self-Esteem During Childhood for Occupational Achievements among Young Men and Women.” Journal of Youth Studies 21: 1392–1410. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1468876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, A., and T. A. DiPrete. 2013. “Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors.” Social Science Research 42: 1519–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, A., and T. A. DiPrete. 2016. “The Consequences of the National Math and Science Performance Environment for Gender Differences in STEM Aspirations.” Sociological Science 3: 568–603. doi: 10.15195/v3.a25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, A. 2016. “The Role of Cultural Contexts in Explaining Cross-National Gender Gaps in STEM Expectations.” European Sociological Review 32: 122–133. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcv078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L. 2006. “Expectations and Aspriations.” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by G. Ritzer, 1528–1531. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., D. Gelbgiser, and K. A. Weeden. 2013. “Feeding the Pipeline: Gender, Occupational Plans, and College Major Selection.” Social Science Research 42: 989–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsenfeld, F. 2014. “Why Do Women’s Fields of Study Pay Less? A Test of Devaluation, Human Capital, and Gender Role Theory.” European Sociological Review 30: 536–548. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsenfeld, F. 2016. “Preferences, Constraints, and the Process of Sex Segregation in College Majors: A Choice Analysis.” Social Science Research 56: 117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. PISA Data Analysis Manual SPSS. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015. Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. In OECD (Ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017a. Education at a Glance 2016. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017b. PISA 2015. Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olitsky, N. H. 2014. “How Do Academic Achievement and Gender Affect the Earnings of STEM Majors? A Propensity Score Matching Approach.” Research in Higher Education 55: 245–271. doi: 10.1007/s11162-013-9310-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polavieja, J. G., and L. Platt. 2014. “Nurse or Mechanic? The Role of Parental Socialization and Children’s Personality in the Formation of Sex-Typed Occupational Aspirations.” Social Forces 93: 31–61. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe, I. J., Z. Boda, and C. Stadtfeld. 2019. “The Social Pipeline: How Friend Influence and Peer Exposure Widen the STEM Gender Gap.” Sociology of Education 92: 105–123. doi: 10.1177/0038040718824095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., B. King, E. Grodsky, and C. Muller. 2012. “The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry Into STEM College Majors Over Time.” American Educational Research Journal 49: 1048–1073. doi: 10.3102/0002831211435229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, I., and E. Polek. 2011. “Teenage Career Aspirations and Adult Career Attainment: The Role of Gender, Social Background and General Cognitive Ability.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 35: 210–217. doi: 10.1177/0165025411398183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E. 1995. “The Loss of Women from Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors: An Explanatory Account.” Science Education 79: 437–473. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730790406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikora, J., and A. Pokropek. 2011. “Gendered Career Expectations of Students: Perspectives from PISA 2006.” OECD Education Working Papers No. 57. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora, J., and A. Pokropek. 2012. “Gender Segregation of Adolescent Science Career Plans in 50 Countries.” Science Education 96: 234–264. doi: 10.1002/sce.20479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, M., S. Steinmetz, and H. van de Werfhorst. 2018. “Gender Norms and STEM: the Importance of Friends for Stopping Leakage from the STEM Pipeline.” Educational Research and Evaluation 24: 417–436. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2019.1589525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1997. “Modeling the Sex-Typing of Occupational Choice: Influences of Occupational Structure.” Sociological Methods & Research 26: 233–261. doi: 10.1177/0049124197026002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar