References
- Araujo, K., and D. Martuccelli. 2012. Desafíos comunes. Retrato de la sociedad chilena y sus individuos. Tomo ll. Santiago: LOM.
- Araujo, K., and D. Martuccelli. 2013. “Individu et néoliberalisme: Reflexions a partir de l’experience chilienne.” Problèmes d’Amériques latine 88 (1): 125–143. doi:10.3917/pal.088.0123.
- Attwood, F., J. Hakim, and A. Winch. 2017. “Mediated Intimacies: Bodies, Technologies and Relationships.” Journal of Gender Studies 26 (3): 249–253. doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1297888.
- Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
- Beck, U., and E. Beck- Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446218693.n12.
- Bergström, M. 2012. “Nouveaux scénarios et pratiques sexuels chez les jeunes utilisateurs de sites de rencontres.” Agora débats/jeunesses 60: 107–119. https://www.cairn.info/revue-agora-debats-jeunesses-2012-1-page-107.htm. doi: 10.3917/agora.060.0107
- Bernasconi, O. 2010. “Being Decent, Being Authentic. The Moral Self in Shifting Discourses of Sexuality Across Three Generations of Chilean Women.” Sociology 44 (5): 860–875. doi:10.1177/0038038510375741.
- Besoain, C., D. Sharim, M. Carmona, D. Bravo, and J. Barrientos. 2017. “Sin conflicto y sin deseo: Las tensiones de la individualización en la experiencia de pareja de jóvenes chilenos.” CES Psicología 10 (1): 109–128. doi:10.21615/cesp.10.1.9 doi: 10.21615/cesp.10.1.10
- boyd, d. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Kindle ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- boyd, d., and N. Ellison. 2008. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
- Bozon, M. 2013. Sociologie de la sexualité. Paris: Armand Colin.
- Cardon, D., and S. Zbigniew. 2014. “Réseaux et les mutations de la sociabilité.” Réseaux 2: 161–185. doi:10.3917/res.184.0161.
- Chambers, D. 2013. Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. Kindle ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Chambers, D. 2017. “Networked Intimacy: Algorithmic Friendship and Scalable Sociality.” European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 26–36. doi:10.1177/0267323116682792.
- Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Kindle ed. London: SAGE.
- Couch, D., and P. Liamputtong. 2008. “Online Dating and Mating: The Use of the Internet to Meet Sexual Partners.” Qualitative Health Research 18 (2): 268–279. doi:10.1177/1049732307312832.
- Curran, M., B. McDaniel, A. Pollitt, and C. Totenhagen. 2015. “Gender, Emotion Work and Relationship Quality: A Daily Diary Study.” Sex Roles 73 (3–4): 157–173. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0495-8.
- Demonceaux, S. 2014. “II. Révolutions Technologiques, Imaginaires Urbains.” Sociologie et Sociétés 46 (1): 125–114. doi:10.7202/1024681ar.
- Feixa, C., A. Fernández-Planells, and M. Figueras-Maz. 2016. “Generación Hashtag. Los movimientos juveniles en la era de la web social.” Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud 14 (1): 107–120. doi:10.11600/1692715x.1416301115.
- Finfgeld-Connett, D. 2018. A Guide to Qualitative Meta-synthesis. New York: Routledge.
- Flichy, P. 2001. L’imaginaire d`Internet. Paris: La Découverte.
- Gómez-Urrutia, V., P. Royo, and M. Cruz. 2017. “Imagining Families: Gender, Youth, and Diversity in Chile.” Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work 32 (4): 491–503. doi:10.1177/0886109917718232.
- Heilborn, M., and C. da Silva Cabral. 2013. “Youth, Gender and Sexual Practices in Brazil.” Psicologia &Sociedade 25: 33–43. doi: 10.1590/S0102-71822013000500005
- Hobbs, M., S. Owen, and L. Gerber. 2017. “Liquid Love? Dating Apps, Sex, Relationship and the Digital Transformation of Intimacy.” Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 271–284. doi:10.1177/1440783316662718.
- Holmes, M. 2015. “Men’s Emotions.” Men and Masculinities 18 (2): 176–192. doi:10.1177/1097184(14557494 doi: 10.1177/1097184X14557494
- Horne, R., and M. Johnson. 2019. “A Labor of Love? Emotion Work in Intimate Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36 (4): 1190–1209. doi:10.1177/0265407518756779.
- Kaufmann, J. 2011. Sexamour. Les nouvelles clés des recontres amoureuses. Paris: Armand Colin.
- Lara, L., and V. Gómez-Urrutia. 2019. “Development and Validation of the Romantic Love Myths Questionnaire.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, online first. doi:10.1177/0886260519892958.
- Lardellier, P. 2012. Les réseaux du coeur. Sexe, amour et séduction sur Internet. Paris: Francois Bourin Editeur.
- Lasén, A., and E. Casado. 2012. “Mobile Telephony and the Remediation of Couple Intimacy.” Feminist Media Studies 12 (4): 550–559. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741871.
- León, R., and S. Meza. 2018. Brecha en el uso de Internet: una expresión de la exclusión social. Santiago de Chile: Fundación País Digital. http://www.paisdigital.org/PD/portfolio-item/brecha-en-el-uso-de-internet-una-expresion-de-la-exclusion-social/.
- Linke, C. 2011. “Being a Couple in a Media World: The Mediatization of Everyday Communication in Couple Relationships.” Communications 36 (1): 91–111. doi:10.1515/comm.2011.005.
- Martin, O., and F. De Singly. 2002. “Le telephone portable dans la vie conjugale: Retrouver un territoire personnel ou maintenir le lien conjugal?” Réseaux 112–113 (2): 212–248. https://www.cairn.info/revue-reseaux1-2002-2-page-212.htm.
- Meenagh, J. 2015. “Flirting, Dating, and Breaking Up within New Media Environments.” Sex Education 15 (5): 458–471. doi:10.1080/14681811.2015.1033516.
- Miguel, C. 2016. “Visual Intimacy on Social Media: From Selfies to the Co-construction of Intimacies Through Shared Pictures.” Social Media and Society 2 (2). doi:10.1177/2056305116641705.
- Miguel, C. 2018. Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Kindle ed. London: Palgrave Pivot.
- Nash, J. 2008. “Re-thinking Intersectionality.” Feminist Review 89: 1–15. doi: 10.1057/fr.2008.4
- Newett, L., B. Churchill, and B. Robards. 2018. “Forming Connections in the Digital Era: Tinder, a New Tool in Young Australian Intimate Life.” Journal of Sociology 54 (3): 346–361. doi:10.1177/1440783317728584.
- Oxford Committee for Famine Relief (OXFAM). 2018. “Rompiendo moldes: transformar imaginarios y normas sociales para eliminar la violencia contra las mujeres.” http://209.177.156.169/libreria_cm/archivos/pdf_1679.pdf.
- Pinsky, D. 2019. “Doing Gender Online Through Flirtation.” RESET [Online], 8. http://journals.openedition.org/reset/1303.
- Reed, L., L. M. Ward, R. M. Tolman, J. R. Lippman, and R. C. Seabrook. 2018. “The Association between Stereotypical Gender and Dating Beliefs and Digital Dating Abuse Perpetration in Adolescent Dating Relationships.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi:10.1177/0886260518801933.
- Robards, B., and S. Lincoln. 2016. “Making it “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use.” Social Media and Society 2 (4). doi:10.1177/2056305116672890.
- Rodriguez, T., and Z. Rodriguez. 2016. “El amor y las nuevas tecnologías: experiencias de comunicación y conflicto.” Comunicación y sociedad 25: 15–41. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-252X2016000100002. doi: 10.32870/cys.v0i25.4420
- Saldaña, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
- Staab, S. 2017. Gender and the Politics of Gradual Change. London: Palgrave.
- Universidad Católica-Adimark. 2013. “Encuesta Nacional Bicentenario.” http://encuestabicentenario.uc.cl/resultados/2013-3/familia-y-trabajo/.
- Van Ouytsel, J., E. Van Gool, M. Walrave, K. Ponnet, and E. Peeters. 2016. “Exploring the Role of Social Networking Sites within Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Dating Experiences.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 76–86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.042.
- Wengraf, T. 2004. Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE.
- Yopo, M. 2017. “Revisiting Individualization: The Transitions to Marriage and Motherhood in Chile.” Current Sociology 66 (5): 748–768. doi:10.1177/0011392117737819.